The use of vascular access devices in hospitalized and home care patients has expanded rapidly in the past decade. New designs, materials, insertion techniques, and protocols for care related to vascular access devices have emerged. Complications associated with them, however, have remained a persistent problem. Septicemia, thrombosis, and occlusion are three of the more serious complications that can lead to the need for removal of the device. These complications are reviewed and areas for future research are identified.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Scott WLComplications associated with central venous catheters. Chest1988;94:1221-4.
2.
Maki DG, Ringer M.Evaluation of dressing regimen for prevention of infection with peripheral intravenous catheters; gauze, a transparent polyurethane dressing and an iodophor-transparent dressing. JAMA1987;258:2396-403.
3.
Curtas S., Tramposch K.Culture methods to evaluate central venous catheter sepsis. NCP1991;6:43-8.
4.
Sitges-Serra A., Puig P., Linares J., et al. Hub colonization as the initial step in an outbreak of catheter-related sepsis due to coagulase negative staphylococci during parenteral nutrition. JPEN1984;8:668-72.
5.
Sitges-Serra A., Linares J., Perez L., et al. A randomized trial on the effect of tubing changes on hub contamination and catheter sepsis during parenteral nutrition. JPEN1985;9:322-5.
6.
Stotter AT, Ward H., Waterfiend H., et al. Junctional care: the key to prevention of catheter sepsis in intravenous feeding. JPEN1987;11:159-62.
7.
Bjornson HS, Colley R., Bower RH, et al. Association between microorganism growth at the catheter insertion site and colonization of the catheter in patients receiving total parenteral nutrition. Surgery1982;92:720-7.
8.
Armstrong CW , Mayhall G., Miller KB, et al. Clinical predictors of infection of central venous catheters used for total parenteral nutrition . Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol1990;11:71-8.
9.
Maki DG, Cobb L., Garman JK, et al. An attachable silver-impregnated cuff for prevention of infection with central venous catheters: a prospective randomized multicenter trial . Am J Med1988;85:307-14.
10.
Norwood SH, Hajjar G., Jenkins L.The influence of an attachable subcutaneous cuffin preventing triple lumen catheter infections in critically ill surgical and trauma patients. Surg Gynecol Obstet1992;175:33-40.
11.
Trooskin SZ , Donetz AP, Harvey RA, et al. Prevention of catheter sepsis by antibiotic bonding. Surgery1985;97:547-51.
12.
Kamal GD, Pfaller MA, Rempe LE, et al. Reduced intravascular catheter infection by antibiotic bonding: a prospective randomized controlled trial. JAMA1991;265:2364-8.
13.
Maki DG, Wheeler SJ, Stoltz SM, et al. Clinical trial of a novel antiseptic-coated central venous catheter [Abstract]. 31st Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, American Society for Microbiology , September 29-October 2, 1991.
14.
Maki DG, Ringer M., Alvarado CJProspective randomized trial of povidone-iodine, alcohol, and chlorhexidine for prevention of infection associated with central venous and arterial catheters . Lancet1991;338:339-43.
15.
Larson E.APIC guidelines for infection control practice: guideline for use of topical antimicrobial agents. Am J Infect Control1988;16:253-66.
16.
Conly JM, Grieves K., Peters B.A prospective randomized study comparing transparent and dry gauze dressing for central venous catheters. J Infect Dis1989;159:310-9.
17.
Hoffmann KK , Weber DJ, Samsa GP, et al. Transparent polyurethane film as an intravenous catheter dressing: a meta-analysis of the infection risks. JAMA1992;267:2072-6.
18.
Richet H., Hubert B., Nitemberg G., et al. Prospective multicenter study of vascular-catheter-related complications and risk factors for positive central catheters in intensive care unit patients . J Clin Microbiol1990;28:2520-5.
19.
Farkas JC, Liu N., Bleriot JPSingle-versus triple-lumen central venous catheter-related sepsis: a prospective randomized study in a critically ill population. Am J Med1992;93:277-82.
20.
Horowitz HW , Dworkin BM, Savino JA, et al. Central catheter-related infections: comparisons of pulmonary artery catheters and triple lumen catheters for the delivery of hyperalimentation in a critical care setting. JPEN1990;14:588-92.
21.
Johnson BH, Rypins EBSingle-lumen vs double-lumen catheters for total parenteral nutrition . Arch Surg1990;125:990-2.
22.
Gil RT, Kruse JA, Thill-Baharizian MC, et al. Triple vs single-lumen central venous catheters: a prospective study in a critically ill population. Arch Intern Med1989;149:1139-43.
23.
Clark-Christoff N., Watters VA, Sparks W., et al. Use of triple-lumen subclavian catheters for administration of total parenteral nutrition. JPEN1992;16:403-7.
24.
Lee RB, Buckner M., Sharp K.Do multi-lumen catheters increase central venous catheter sepsis compared to single-lumen catheters? J Trauma1988;28:1472-5.
25.
McCarthy MC , Shives JK, Robison RJ, et al. Prospective evaluation of single and triple lumen catheters in total parenteral nutrition . JPEN1987;11:259-62.
26.
Pemberton LB , Lyman B., Lander V., et al. Sepsis from triple- vs single-lumen catheters during total parenteral nutrition in surgical or critically ill patients. Arch Surg1986 ;121:591-4.
27.
Maki DGPathogenesis, prevention, and management of infections due to intravascular devices used for infusion therapy. In: Brisno AL, Waldvogel FA, eds. Infections associated with indwelling medical devices. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology, 1989:171.
28.
Michel LA, Bradpiece HA, Randour P., et al. Safety of central venous catheter change over guidewire for suspected catheter-related sepsis. A prospective randomized trial. Int Surg1988;73:180-6.
29.
Armstrong CW , Mayhall GC, Miller KB, et al. Prospective study of catheter replacement and other risk factors for infection of hyperalimentation catheters. J Infect Dis1986;154:808-16.
30.
Newsome HH, Armstrong CW, Mayhall GC, et al. Mechanical complication from insertion of subclavian venous feeding catheters: comparison of de novo percutaneous venipuncture to change of catheter over guidewire. JPEN1984;5:560-2.
31.
Lewis JA, LaFrance R., Bower RHTreatment of an infected silicone right atrial catheter with combined fibrinolytic and antibiotic therapy: care report and review of the literature . JPEN1989;13:92-8.
32.
Curnow A., Idowu J., Behrens E., et al. Urokinase therapy for Silastic catheter-induced intravascular thrombi in infants and children. Arch Surg1985;120:1237-40.
33.
Gaillard JL , Merlino R., Pajot N., et al. Conventional and nonconventional modes of vancomycin administration to decontaminate the internal surface of catheters colonized with coagulase-negative staphylococci . JPEN1990;14:593-7.
34.
Borow M., Crowley JGEvaluation of central venous catheter thrombogenicity. Acta Anaesth Scand1985;81(suppl):59-64.
35.
DiConstanzo JD, Sastre B., Choux R., et al. Mechanism of thrombogenesis during total parenteral nutrition: role of catheter composition . JPEN1988;12:190-4.
36.
Linder LE, Curelaru I., Gustavsson B., et al. Material thrombogenicity in central venous catheters: a comparison between soft, antebrachial catheters of silicone elastomer and polyurethane . JPEN1984;8:399-406.
37.
Bozzetti F. , Scarpa D., Terno G., et al. Subclavianvenous thrombosis due to indwelling catheters: a prospective study on 52 patients . JPEN1983;7:560-2.
38.
Welch GW, McKeel DW, Silverstein P., et al. The role of catheter composition in the development ofthrombophlebitis . Surg Gynecol Obstet1974;138:421-4.
39.
McKee JM , Shell JA, Warren TA, et al. Complications of intravenous therapy: a randomized prospective study...Vialon vs Teflon. J Intravenous Nur1981;12:288-95.
40.
Davis CLUpper extremity venous thrombosis and central venous catheters. Crit Care Nurse1991;11:16-22.
41.
Lowell JA, Bothe A.Venous access: preoperative, operative, and postoperative dilemmas . Surg Clin North Am1991;71:1232-46.
42.
Bern MM, Lokich JJ, Wallach SR, et al. Very low doses of warfarin can prevent thrombosis in central venous catheters: a randomized prospective trial. Ann Intern Med1990;112: 423-8.
43.
Hurtubise MR , Bottino JC, Lawson M., et al. Restoring patency of central venous catheters. Arch Surg1980;115:212-3.
44.
Lawson M., Bottino JC, Hurtubise MR, et al. The use of urokinase to restore patency of occluded central venous catheters. Am J Intraven Ther Clin Nutr1982;9:29-32.
45.
Bjeletich J.Declotting central venous catheters with urokinase in the home by nurse clinicians. Natl Intravenous Ther Assoc1987;6:428-30.
46.
Atkinson JB , Bagnall HA, Gomperts E.Investigational use of tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) for occluded central venous catheters . JPEN1990;14:310-11.
47.
Bagnall HA, Gompertz E., Atkinson JBContinuous infusion of low-dose urokinase in the treatment of central venous catheter thrombosis in infants and children. Pediatrics1989;83:963-6.
48.
Monturo CA, Dickerson RN, Mullen JLEfficacy of thrombolytic therapy for occlusion of long-term catheters . JPEN1990; 14:312-4.
49.
Shulman RJ, Reed T., Pitre D., et al. Use of hydrochloric acid to clear obstructed central venous catheters. JPEN1988;12: 509-10.
50.
Pennington CR, Pithie ADEthanol lock in the management of catheter occlusion. JPEN1987;11:507-8.
51.
Goodwin ML, Carlson I.The peripherally inserted central catheter. A retrospective look at three years of insertions. J Intravenous Nur1993 ;16:92-103.
52.
Hadaway LCAn overview of vascular access devices inserted via the antecubital area. J Intravenous Nur1990;13:297-306.
53.
Ryder M., Viall C.Total parenteral nutrition. In: Boggs RL, Wooldridge-King M, eds. AACN procedure manual for critical care. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders , 1993;771-812.
54.
Abi-Nader J.Peripherally inserted central venous catheters in critical care. (in press)
