Conducting nutrition research projects does not require a large, well-funded laboratory and a team of assistants. The main requirement is an inquisitive, creative, and critical mind face to face with an unsolved problem. Nevertheless, the actual process of getting started in clinical nutrition research can present obstacles for the novice clinician that can impede successful implementation and completion of the project. This article reviews the initial steps involved in generating a hypothesis, study design, and preliminary data analysis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
2.
Feinstein A.Clinical biostatistics;-XLI. Hard science, soft data, and the challenges of choosing clinical variables in research. Clin Pharmacol Ther1977;22:485-98.
3.
Brown B.Statistical controversies in the design of clinical trials-some personal views . Controlled Clin Trials1980;1:13-27.
4.
Zelen M.The randomization and stratification of patients to clinical trials . J Chronic Dis1974;27:365-75.
5.
Cassilth B.Informed consent-why are its goals imperfectly realized?N Engl J Med1980;302:896-900.
6.
Grundner T.On the readability of surgical consent forms. N Engl J Med1980;302:900-2.
7.
Habicht J.Some characteristics of indicators of nutritional status for use in screening and surveillance. Am J Clin Nutr1980;33:531-5.
8.
Ransohoff D. , Feinstein A.Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests. N Engl J Med1978;299:926-30.
9.
Galen R., Gambino S.Beyond normality: the predictive value and efficiency of medical diagnoses . New York: John Wiley and Sons , 1975.
10.
Swinscow T.Statistics at Square One. London, British Medical Association, 1977.
11.
Langley R.Practical Statistics Simply Explained. New York , Dover Publications Inc., 1970 .
12.
Freiman J., Chalmers T., Smith H., et al. The importance of beta, the type II error, and sample size in the design and interpretation of the randomized control trial. N Engl J Med1978;299:690-4.
13.
Detsky A., Sackett D.When was a "negative" clinical trial big enough?Arch Intern Med1985;145:709-12.
14.
Gardner M., Altman D.Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. Br Med J1986;292:746-50.
Feinstein A.Clinical Biostatistics-XXXIV. The other side of "statistical significance": alpha, beta, delta, and the calculation of sample size. Clin Pharmacol Ther1975;18:491-505.
17.
Schneiderman M.The proper size of a clinical trial: "Grandma's strudel" method. J New Drugs1964;4:3-11.
18.
Young M., Bresnitz E., Strom B.Sample size nomograms for interpreting negative clinical studies. Ann Intern Med1983;99:248-51.
19.
Ellenberg S. : Determining sample sizes for clinical trials . Oncology1989;3:39-51.
20.
Matthews DE, Farewell VTUsing and understanding medical statistics. New York, Karger, 1988.
21.
Godfrey K.Comparing the means of several groups. New Engl J Med1985;313:1450-56.
22.
McPherson K.Statistics: the problem of examining accumulating data more than once. New Engl J Med1974;290:501-2.
23.
Tukey J.Exploratory Data Analysis. Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1977.
