Fostering Coping Skills and Resilience in Home Enteral Nutrition (HEN) Consumers

Abstract

Background: Home enteral nutrition (HEN) is a lifesaving therapy that provides benefits along with countless challenges. This qualitative study examined how HEN consumers learned to cope successfully with HEN-related challenges and uncovered how healthcare providers could help foster the process of coping in other HEN consumers. Methods: Twelve adult HEN consumers who perceived that they were coping successfully and overcoming the adversity associated with HEN, and met the criteria for resilience using the Resilience Scale, self-selected for the study. Participants engaged in a series of 2 in-depth interviews. Data were coded and analyzed using grounded theory methodology. Results: One overarching theme and 5 main categories emerged from the data, revealing that these individuals coped successfully with HEN by developing an attitude of personal responsibility to accept new life conditions, take charge of their own well-being, seek and accept support, maximize independence and normality, and focus on the positive. In addition, these participants used a variety of problem- and emotion-focused coping strategies and shared resilient characteristics such as self-efficacy and perseverance. Conclusions: Implications for clinical practice and HEN education, along with suggestions for healthcare providers to foster coping with HEN are provided. An educational manual with self-help suggestions for adult HEN consumers is also available at http://www.copingwell.com.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Padilla GV, Grant MM. Psychosocial aspects of artificial feeding. Cancer. 1985 ;55(suppl 1):S301– S304.

Srp F, Steiger E, Gulledge AD, et al. Psychosocial issues of nutrition support. A multidisciplinary interpretation. Nurs Clin North Am. 1989;24:447– 459.

Hoffman KC. Psychosocial concerns of home nutrition therapy consumers. Nutr Clin Pract. 1989 ;4:51– 56.

Gulledge AD, Srp F, Sharp JW, Matarese LE, O'Neill M, Steiger E. Psychosocial issues of home parenteral and enteral nutrition. Nutr Clin Pract. 1987;2:183– 194.

Oley Foundation. Living with enteral feeds: an exploration of the physical and psychosocial issues. Lifeline Lett. 1997 ; 1–3.

Schneider SM, Pouget I, Staccini P, Rampal P, Hebuterne S. Quality of life in long-term home enteral nutrition patients. Clin Nutr. 2000;19:23– 28.

Roberge C, Tran M, Massound C, et al. Quality of life and home enteral tube feeding: a French prospective study in patients with head and neck or oesophageal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2000 ;82:263– 269.

Bannerman E, Pendlebury J, Phillips F, Ghosh S. A crosssectional and longitudinal study of health-related quality of life after percutaneous gastrostomy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000 ;12:1101– 1109.

Liley AJ, Manthorpe J. The impact of home enteral tube feeding in everyday life: a qualitative study. Health Soc Care Community. 2003;11:415– 422.

10.

Saleebey D. The strengths perspective in social work practice: extensions and cautions. Soc Work. 1996 ;41:296– 305.

11.

Seligman MEP. Positive psychology, positive prevention, and positive therapy. In: Snyder CR, Lopez SJ, eds. Handbook of Positive Psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press;2002 : 3–9.

12.

Marshall C, Rossman GB. Designing Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications;1999 .

13.

Ungar M. Qualitative contributions to resilience research. Qualitative Social Work. 2003 ;2:85– 102.

14.

Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company;1984 .

15.

Richardson GE. The metatheory of resilience and resiliency. J Clin Psychol. 2002 ;58:307– 321.

16.

Wagnild GM, Young HM. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Resilience Scale. J Nurs Meas. 1993 ;1:165– 178.

17.

Strauss A, Corbin C. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1998.

18.

Paterson B, Kieloch B, Gmiterek J. “They never told us anything”: postdischarge instruction for families of persons with brain injuries. Rehabil Nurs. 2001 ;26:48– 53.

19.

Lukoschek P, Fazzari M, Marantz P. Patient and physician factors predict patients' comprehension of health information. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;50:201– 210.

20.

Smith CE, Curtas S, Kleinbeck SVM, et al. Clinical trial of interactive and videotaped educational interventions reduce infection, reactive depression, and rehospitalizations for sepsis in patients on home parenteral nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2003 ;27:137– 145.

21.

Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H, Grumbach K. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA. 2002;288:2469– 2475.

22.

Bulsara C, Ward A, Joske D. Hematological cancer patients: achieving a sense of empowerment by use of strategies to control illness. J Clin Nurs. 2004 ;13:251– 258.

23.

Funnell MM. Patient-centered care: helping patients take charge of their chronic illnesses. Fam Pract Manag. 2000 ;7:47– 51.

24.

Rogers A, Kennedy A, Nelson E, Robinson A. Uncovering the limits of patient-centeredness: implementing a self-management trial for chronic illness. Qual Health Res. 2005 ;15:224– 239.

25.

Thompson SC. The role of personal control in adaptive functioning. In: Lopez CR, Lopez SJ, eds. Handbook of Positive Psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press;2002 : 202–213.

26.

Cvengros JA, Christensen AJ, Lawton WJ. The role of perceived control and preference for control in adherence to a chronic medical regimen. Ann Behav Med. 2004 ;27:155– 161.

27.

Bayliss EA, Steiner JF, Fernald DH, Crane LA, Main DS. Descriptions of barriers to self-care by persons with comorbid chronic diseases. Ann Fam Med. 2003 ;1:15– 21.

28.

Jerant AF, von Friederichs-Fitzwater MM, Moore M. Patients' perceived barriers to active self-management of chronic conditions. Patient Educ Couns. 2005 ;57:300– 307.

29.

Stanton AL, Parsa A, Austenfeld JL. The adaptive potential of coping through emotional approach. In: Lopez CR, Lopez SJ, eds. Handbook of Positive Psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2002:148– 158.

30.

Wenzel L, Glanz K, Lerman C. Stress, coping, and health behavior. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education. 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass;2002 : 210–239.

31.

de Haes H, Koedoot N. Patient-centered decision making in palliative cancer treatment: a world of paradoxes. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;50:43– 49.

32.

Coulter A. Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision making. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1997 ;2:112– 121.

33.

van der Molen B. Relating information needs to the cancer experience, 1: information as a key coping strategy. Eur J Cancer Care. 1999;8:238– 244.

34.

Friis LS, Elverdam B, Schmidt KG. The patient's perspective: a qualitative study of acute myeloid leukaemia patients' need for information and their information-seeking behavior. Support Care Cancer. 2003;11:162– 170.

35.

Langford CP, Bowsher J, Maloney JP, Lillis PP. Social support: a conceptual analysis. J Adv Nurs. 1997 ;25:95– 100.

36.

Kornblith AB, Herndon JE, Zuckerman E, et al. Social support as a buffer to psychological impact of stressful life events in women with breast cancer. Cancer. 2001 ;91:443– 454.

37.

Silver HJ. The lived experience of home total parenteral nutrition: an online qualitative inquiry with adults, children, and mothers. Nutr Clin Pract. 2004 ;19:297– 304.