Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The traditional practice of gastric residual volumes (GRVs) is flawed in its design and conception, is poorly standardized in its technique, is an inaccurate measure of gastric emptying, and serves as an insensitive marker for regurgitation and aspiration. The refractive index of a solution (like an enteral formula) is a physical property of that solution, which is remarkably constant and reproducible under varying conditions of concentration, pH, and temperature. Refractometry may be performed quickly and easily at the bedside, requires only a small representative sample of aspirated solution, and provides valuable measurements that can be used to calculate both the true total volume of contents and the specific volume of formula remaining in the stomach. Refractometry complements the use of GRVs as a monitor for patients receiving enteral feeding and should improve the accuracy with which patients at risk for aspiration may be identified.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Metheny N, Reed L, Worseck M, Clark J. How to aspirate fluid from small-bore feeding tubes. Am J Nurs. 1993 ;93:86– 88.

McClave SA, Sexton LK, Spain DA, et al. Enteral tube feeding in the intensive care unit: factors impending adequate delivery. Crit Care Med. 1999;27:1252– 1256.

Lukan JK, McClave SA, Stefater AJ, et al. Poor validity of residual volumes as a marker for risk of aspiration. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;75:417S– 418S.

Lin HC, Van Citters GW. Stopping enteral feeding for arbitrary gastric residual volume may not be physiologically sound: results of a computer simulation model. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1997;21:286– 289.

McClave SA, Snider HL, Lowen CC, et al. Use of residual volume as a marker for enteral feeding intolerance: prospective blinded comparison with physical examination and radiological findings. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1992;16:99– 105.

Meyer GE, Novielli KA, Smith JE. Use of refractive index measurement for quality assurance of pediatric parenteral nutrition solutions. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1987 ;44:1617– 1620.

Cheung JF, Chong S, Kitrenos JG, Ho-Leung F. Use of refractometer to detect controlled substance tampering. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1991;48:1488– 1492.

Frankenfield DL, Johnson RE. Refractometry of controlled substances. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1991 ;48:2129– 2130.

Pomeranz Y, Meloan CE. Refractometry and polarimetry. In: Pomeranz Y, Meloan CE, eds. Food Analysis. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall; 1994:430– 448.

10.

Bradley RL. Moisture and total solids analysis. In: Nielsen SS, ed. Introduction to the Chemical Analysis of Foods. Boston, MA: Jones & Bartlett; 1994:95– 111.

11.

Chang WK, Chen MZ, Chao YC. Use of the refractometer as a tool to monitor dietary formula concentration in gastric juice. Clin Nutr. 2002;21:521– 525.

12.

Chang WK, McClave SA, Lee MS, Chao YC. Monitoring bolus nasogastric tube feeding by the Brix value determination and residual volume measurement of gastric contents. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2004 ;28:105– 112.

13.

Chang WK, McClave SA, Chao YC. Continuous nasogastric tube feeding: monitoring by combined use of refractometry and traditional gastric residual volumes. Clin Nutr. 2004 ;23:105– 112.

Enhancing Interpretation of Gastric Residual Volume by Refractometry

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References