AxelssonK.NorbergA. och AsplundK.: Omvårdnadsdiagnos tillämpd på ätproblem hos patient med cerebrovaskuär sjukdom. Värd i Norden, vären 1986, sid 306–10
3.
BircherA.: Where does the Conceptual Framework fit?Classification of Nursing Diagnosis: Proceeding of the Sixth Conference, North American Association, Ed.: HurleyM, C.V. Mosby, St Louis, 1986 (a), pp 66–99
4.
BulechekG. and Mc CloskeyJ.Nursing Intervention: Treatment for Nursing DiagnosisW.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia. USA. 1985
5.
CarlsonJ.H.CraftC.A. and Mc GurieA.D.: Nursing Diagnosis. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, USA, 1982.
6.
CarnevaliD.L.MiltchellP.H.WoodsN.F. and TannerC.A.: Diagnostic Reasoning in Nursing. J.B. Lippincott Company. Philadelphia, USA, 1984
7.
CarnevaliD.L. and MaxineP.: Nursing Management for the Ederly. J.B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia, USA, 1986
8.
CarnevaliD.L.: Private Communication, 1987
9.
GebbieK.M. and LavinM.A. (Eds): Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceeding of the first national conferenceC.V. Mosby Co, St Louis, 1975
10.
GordonM.: Nursing Diagnosis: Process and application. Mc Graw Hill Book Company, New York, 1982
11.
GordonM.: The Diagnostic Process. In KimM.J. and MoritzD.A. editors: Classification of Nursing Diagnoses -Proceedings of the Third and Fourth National Conference. McGraw-Hill Book Co, New York, 1982
12.
GriffithJ. and ChristensenP.: Nursing Process. Application of Theories, Frameworks and Models. C.V. Mosby Co, St Louis, USA, 1982
13.
HeidenborgI. och Rönér-DouhanG.: Omvårdnadsdiagnos. Att bestämma patientens behov — det förstas steget i omvårdnadsprocessen Institutet för Medicinsk Rätt AB. 1985, sid 109–28
14.
IyerP.W.TaptichB.J. and Bernocchi-LoseyD.: Nursing Process and Nursing Diagnoses. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, USA, 1986
15.
KirkL.W.: Framework. Classification of Nursing Diagnoses: Proceedings of the Sixth Conference, North American Association, Ed.: HurleyM., C.V. Mosby, St Louis, 1986 pp 50–65
16.
KritekP.: The Generation and Classification of Nursing Diagnoses: Toward a Theory of Nursing. Image, Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 10:2, 1978, pp 33–40;.
17.
KritekP.: Report of the Group Work on Taxonomi. Classification of Nursing Diagnoses: Proceedings of the Fifth National Conference, C.V. Mosby, St Louis, 1985 (a), pp 46–58
18.
KritekP.: Current Nomenclature and Classification System: Pertinent Issues. Classification of Nursing Diagnoses: Proceedings of the Fifth National Conference, C.V. Mosby, St Louis, 1984 (b), pp 73–99
19.
KritekP.: Conceptual Conciderations, Decision Criteria and Guidelines Appropriate to the Development of Nursing Minimum Data Set: From a Practice Perspective. University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee School of Nursing, USA, 1985 (a)
KritekP.: Nursing Diagnosis in Perspective: Response to a Critique. The Journal of Nursing Scholarship17:1, 1985 (c), pp 3–8
22.
KritekP.: Development of Taxonomic Structure for Nursing Diagnosis: A Review and an Update in Classification of Nursing. Classification of Nursing Diagnoses: Proceedings of the Sixth Conference, North American Association, Ed.: HurleyM, C.V. Mosby, St Louis, 1986 (a), pp 23–38
23.
KritekP.: Diagnostics — The struggle to Classify our Diagnoses. American Journal of Nursing, 1986 (b)
24.
KritekP.: Impact of Nursing Theory on the Diagnostic Process. Theoretical Pluralism: Direction for a Practice Discipline Nursing Theory Congress, Toronto, Canada, August, 1986
25.
KritekP.: Impact of Nursing Theory on Diagnostic Process. Private Comunication, 1986
26.
LawsonK. and LackeyN.: Development of an Instrument to Measure altered levels of awerness in significant others who have experienced psychological impact. Classification of Nursing Diagnoses: Proceedings of the Sixth Conference, North American Association, Ed.: HurleyM, C.V. Mosby, St Louis, 1986, pp 349–59
27.
LumneyM.: Process — the PES System: A Time for Change. Classification of Nursing Diagnoses: Proceedings of the Sixth Conference, North American Association, Ed.: HurleyM, C.V. Mosby, St Louis, 1986, pp 215–25
28.
MeleisA.: Theoretical Nursing: Development and ProgressJ.B. Lippincott Co, Philadelphia, 1985North American Nursing Association. Classification of Nursing Diagnosis: Proceedings of the Sixth Conference. North American Association, Ed.: HurleyM, C.V. Mosby, St Louis, 1986
29.
PorterE.J.: Critical Analysis of NAN DA Nursing Diagnosis Toxonomi. Image. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 18:4, 1986, pp 136–9
30.
RoyC.: Framework for Classification system development: Progress and Issues. Classification of Nursing Diagnoses: Proceedings of the Fifth National Conference, C.V. Mosby, St Louis, 1984
31.
SPRI rapport. Arne och Rut-Försök med individuell vårdplanering inom akutsjukvården. SPRI, Stockholm, 1986, rapport 212.