Teachers of courses in the history of psychology sometimes assign term papers requiring the treatment of a single major figure in the discipline. One instructive conceptual framework for writing such “great person” essays is to interpret a psychobgist's life and work according to the typical profile of an eminent scientist. This profile is provided by empirical research in the metasciences, especially the psychology of science. A sample handout suggests some of the questions that students can address when evaluating whether an eminent psychologist fits the generic pattern.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FischR. (1977). Psychology of science. In Spiegel-RösingI., & PriceD. (Eds.), Science, technology, and society: A cross-disciplinary perspective (pp. 277–318). London: Sage.
2.
GaltonF. (1874). English men of science: Their nature and nurture.London: Macmillan.
3.
GholsonB., ShadishW. R.Jr., NeimeyerR. A., & HoutsA. C. (Eds.). (1988). The psychology of science: Contributions to metascience.New York: Cambridge University Press.
4.
HelmreichR. L., SpenceJ. T., BeaneW. E., LuckerG. W., & MatthewsK. A. (1980). Making it in academic psychology: Demographic and personality correlates of attainment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 896–908.
5.
A history of psychology in autobiography. (1930–1989). New York: Russell & Russell.
6.
JacksonD. N., & RushtonJ. P. (Eds.). (1987). Scientific excellence: Origins and assessment.Beverly Hills: Sage.
7.
MansfieldR. S., & BusseT. V. (1981). The psychology of creativity and discovery: Scientists and their work.Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
8.
RoeA. (1952). The making of a scientistNew York: Dodd, Mead.
9.
ScarboroughE., & FurumotoL. (1987). Untold lives: The first generation of American women psychologists.New York: Columbia University Press.
10.
SimontonD. K. (1988). Scientific genius: A psychology of science.New York: Cambridge University Press.
11.
SimontonD. K. (1992). Leaders of American psychology, 1879–1967: Career development, creative output, and professional achievement.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 5–17.
12.
TaylorC. W., & BarronF. X. (Eds.). (1963). Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development.New York: Wiley.
13.
WatsonR. I. (Ed.). (1974–1976). Eminent contributors to psychology (Vols. 1 & 2). New York: Springer.
14.
WispéL. G. (1965). Some social and psychological correlates of eminence in psychology.Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 7, 88–98.
15.
ZusneL. (1987). Contributions to the history of psychology: XLIV. Coverage of contributors in histories of psychology.Psychological Reports, 61, 343–350.
