College Entrance Examination Board. A description of the college board scholastic aptitude test.Princeton, N. J.: The Board, 1964.
2.
FloydJ. R.Jr., & LumsdenD. B.Effects of frame size in teaching vocabulary development with programmed instruction. Improving Human Performance: A Research Quarterly, 1973, 4, 267-272.
3.
FreyP. W.Student ratings of teaching: Validity of several rating factors. Science, 1973, 182, 83-85.
4.
HarariO., & ZedeckS.Development of behaviorally anchored scales for the evaluation of faculty teaching. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973, 58, 261-265.
5.
KellerF. S.“Goodbye, teacher…”Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1968, 1, 78-89.
6.
KlementJ. J., LumsdenD. B., & ShearonR. W.Learning of redundant materials presented through one versus two sensory modalities. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 1973, 10, 65-68.
7.
LumsdenD. B., & VollumM. A.The effectiveness of computer assisted instruction in relation to levels of student self-esteem. Journal of Adult Education, 1974, 2, 21-26.
8.
McGuiganF. J.The G statistic: An index of amount learned. National Society for Programmed Instruction Journal, 1967, 6, 14-16.
9.
McGuiganF. J., DanielR. W., VannorsdallE. K., & BerteraJ. H.A national field-test of selected programmed reading materials for undereducated adults. Center Research Monograph Number 3, Adult Learning Center, November, 1972.
10.
McGuiganF. J., & PetersR. J.Jr.Assessing the effectiveness of programmed texts - methodology and some findings. Journal of Programmed Instruction, 1065, 3, 23-24.
11.
RodewaldH. K., & CarrollJ. L., Problems in use of student ratings of faculty. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1974, 38, 574.
12.
RodinM., & RodinB.Student evaluations of teachers. Science, 1972, 177, 1164-1166.