Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

Open Educational Resources (OER) may have the potential to enhance student success, yet OER quality and effectiveness vary, and confounding variables have influenced research.

Objective

This study investigated the impact of OER on student performance, perceptions, and textbook usage in general psychology, while controlling for the instructor and student variability that has affected prior research.

Method

Two sections of general psychology used OER textbooks, while two sections used commercial textbooks (CT). Lecture content and exams were redesigned for the present study, drawing equally from both source materials. Students were assessed based on exam performance and surveyed about their perceptions and usage of textbooks.

Results

The OER and CT groups performed similarly. The OER did not negatively affect student performance; students had favorable views of the OER and reported no significant differences in usage.

Conclusion

Given small effect sizes in favor of OER, cost-savings for students, and favorable student perceptions of OER, this study encourages the use of OER.

Teaching Implications

There is growing evidence that OER can improve student success, especially for those who may not purchase course materials. Teachers of general psychology should consider adopting OER and assess how many students are not purchasing textbook materials.

Keywords

Open Educational Resources (OER)general psychology student performance student perceptions textbook usage cost-savings

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abramovich

McBride

(2018). Open education resources and perceptions of financial value. The Internet and Higher Education, 39, 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.06.002

Beile

de Noyelles

Raible

(2020). Analysis of an open textbook adoption in an American history course: Impact on student academic outcomes and behaviors. College & Research Libraries, 81(4), 721. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.81.4.721

Bliss

T. J.

Robinson

T. J.

Hilton

Wiley

D. A.

(2013). An OER COUP: College teacher and student perceptions of open educational resources. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2013(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.5334/2013-04

Bliss

T. J.

Smith

(2017). A brief history of open educational resources. In Jhangiani

R. S.

Biswas-Diener

(Eds.), Open: The philosophy and practices that are revolutionizing education and science (pp. 9–27). Ubiquity Press. https://doi.org/10.5334/bbc.b

Bol

Esqueda

M. C.

Ryan

Kimmel

S. C.

(2021). A comparison of academic outcomes in courses taught with open educational resources and publisher content. Sage Journals, 51(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211052563

Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2016, August 30). College tuition and fees increase 63 percent since January 2006. The Economics Daily. https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2016/college-tuition-and-fees-increase-63-percent-since-january-2006.htm

California Student Aid Commission. (2019, November 7). 2018–19 student expenses and resources survey: Initial insights an initial look at the obstacles students face affording higher education. https://www.csac.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/2018-19_student_expenses_and_resources_survey_web.pdf

Chiorescu

(2017). Exploring open educational resources for college algebra. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(4), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i4.3003

Cho

K. W.

Permzadian

(2024). The impact of open educational resources on student achievement: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 126(8), 102365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102365

10.

Choi

Y. M.

Carpenter

(2017). Evaluating the impact of open educational resources: A case study. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 17(4), 685–693. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2017.0041

11.

Clinton

(2018). Savings without sacrifice: A case report on open-source textbook adoption. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 33(3), 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2018.1486184

12.

Clinton

(2019). Cost, outcomes, use, and perceptions of open educational resources in psychology: A narrative review of the literature. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 18(1), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725718799511

13.

Clinton

Khan

(2019). Efficacy of open textbook adoption on learning performance and course withdrawal rates: A meta-analysis. AERA Open, 5(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419872212

14.

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587

15.

Colvard

N. B.

Watson

C. E.

Park

(2018). The impact of open educational resources on various student success metrics. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 30(2), 262–276. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1184998

16.

Cooney

(2017). What impacts do OER have on students? Students share their experiences with a health psychology OER at New York City College of Technology. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(4), 155–178. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i4.3111

17.

de los Arcos

Farrow

Perryman

L. -A.

Pitt

Weller

(2014). OER evidence report 2013-2014. OER Research Hub. https://www.oerknowledgecloud.org/record839

18.

Dennen

V. P.

Bagdy

L. M.

(2019). From proprietary textbook to custom OER solution: Using learner feedback to guide design and development. Online Learning, 23(3), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i3.2068

19.

Diener

Biswas-Diener

(2017). Open-source for educational materials making textbooks cheaper and better. In Jhangiani

R. S.

Biswas-Diener

(Eds.), Open: The philosophy and practices that are revolutionizing education and science (pp. 209–217). Ubiquity Press. https://doi.org/10.5334/bbc.p

20.

Faul

Erdfelder

Lang

A.-G.

Buchner

(2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146

21.

Finlayson

(2020). Writing and implementing an open textbook in world regional geography: A case study. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(4), 245–254. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i4.4756

22.

Fischer

Hilton

Robinson

T. J.

Wiley

D. A.

(2015). A multi-institutional study of the impact of open textbook adoption on the learning outcomes of post-secondary students. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 27(3), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-015-9101-x

23.

Florida Virtual Campus. (2019). 2018 student textbook and course materials survey: Results and findings. https://www.oerknowledgecloud.org/record2630

24.

Freeman

(2025, February). Student generative AI survey 2025 (HEPI Policy Note No. 61). Higher Education Policy Institute. https://www.hepi.ac.uk/reports/student-generative-ai-survey-2025/

25.

Grewe

Davis

W. P.

(2017). The impact of enrollment in an OER course on student learning outcomes. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(4), 231–238. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i4.2986

26.

Griggs

R. A.

Jackson

S. L.

(2017a). Open introductory psychology textbooks: Prose and qualms. Teaching of Psychology, 44(3), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628317711283

27.

Griggs

R. A.

Jackson

S. L.

(2017b). Studying open versus traditional textbook effects on students’ course performance: Confounds abound. Teaching of Psychology, 44(4), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628317727641

28.

Grimaldi

P. J.

Basu Mallick

Waters

A. E.

Baraniuk

R. G.

(2019). Do open educational resources improve student learning? Implications of the access hypothesis. PLoS One, 14(3), Article e0212508. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212508

29.

Grissett

J. O.

Huffman

(2019). An open versus traditional psychology textbook: Student performance, perceptions, and use. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 18(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725718810181

30.

Gurung

R. A.

(2017a). Are OE resources high quality? In Jhangiani

R. S.

Biswas-Diener

(Eds.), Open: The philosophy and practices that are revolutionizing education and science (pp. 79–86). Ubiquity Press. https://doi.org/10.5334/bbc

31.

Gurung

R. A. R

. (2017b). Predicting learning: Comparing an open educational resource and standard textbooks. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 3(3), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000092

32.

Gurung

R. A. R.

Martin

R. C.

(2011). Predicting textbook reading: The Textbook Assessment and Usage Scale. Teaching of Psychology, 38(1), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628310390913

33.

Hilton

(2016). Open educational resources and college textbook choices: A review of research on efficacy and perceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 573–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9434-9

34.

Hilton

(2020). Open educational resources, student efficacy, and user perceptions: A synthesis of research published between 2015 and 2018. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 853–876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09700-4

35.

Hilton

Fischer

Wiley

Williams

(2016). Maintaining momentum toward graduation: OER and the course throughput rate. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 17(6), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i6.2686

36.

Hilton

Laman

(2012). One college’s use of an open psychology textbook. Open Learning, 27(3), 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2012.716657

37.

Hilton

Larsen

Wiley

Fischer

(2020). Substituting open educational resources for commercial curriculum materials: Effects on student mathematics achievement in elementary schools. Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 60–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2019.1573150

38.

Hoskins

Gruber

(2025). Why are we still asking students to buy textbooks for general education? Journal of Open Educational Resources in Higher Education 3(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.31274/joerhe.17789

39.

Howard

V. J.

Whitmore

C. B.

(2020). Evaluating student perceptions of open and commercial psychology textbooks. Frontiers in Education, 5, Article 139. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00139

40.

Jhangiani

R. S.

Dastur

F. N.

Le Grand

Penner

(2018). As good or better than commercial textbooks: Students’ perceptions and outcomes from using open digital and open print textbooks. Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2018.1.5

41.

Junasova

Rzeplinksi

Alards-Tomalin

(2025). Open in higher education: Student experiences and perceptions of OER. Journal of Open Educational Resources in Higher Education, 3(1), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.31274/joerhe.17955

42.

Landrum

R. E.

Gurung

R. A.

Spann

(2012). Assessments of textbook usage and the relationship to student course performance. College Teaching, 60(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2011.609573

43.

Magro

Tabaei

S. V.

(2020). Results from a psychology OER pilot program: Faculty and student perceptions, cost savings, and academic outcomes. Open Praxis, 12(1), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.12.1.1007

44.

Nusbaum

A. T.

Cuttler

(2020). Hidden impacts of OER: Effects of OER on instructor ratings and course selection. Frontiers in Education, 5, Article 72. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00072

45.

Orr

Guthrie

(2005). Anchoring, information, expertise, and negotiation: New insights from meta-analysis. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 21(3), 597. https://ssrn.com/abstract=900152

46.

Read

Tang

Dhamija

Bodily

(2020). Understanding the impact of OER courses in relation to student socioeconomic status and employment. International Journal of Open Educational Resources, 3(1), 47–72. https://doi.org/10.18278/ijoer.3.1.5

47.

Reed

Turner

(2018). Experiential learning and open education: Partnering with students to evaluate OER accessibility. In Wesolek

Lashley

Langley

(Eds.), OER: A field guide for academic librarians (pp. 93–113). Pacific University Press. https://commons.pacificu.edu/pup/3

48.

Ross

H. M.

Hendricks

Mowat

(2018). Open textbooks in an introductory sociology course in Canada: Student views and completion rates. Open Praxis, 10(4), 393–403. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.10.4.892

49.

Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition. (2018). Save students $1 billion. Sparcopen.org. https://sparcopen.org/save-1-billion/

50.

Seaman

J. E.

Seaman

(2021). Digital texts in the time of COVID: Educational resources in US Higher Education, 2020. Bay View Analytics. https://www.bayviewanalytics.com/reports/digitaltextsinthetimeofcovid.pdf

51.

Seaman

J. E.

Seaman

(2023). Digitally established: Educational resources in US Higher Education, 2023. Bay View Analytics. https://www.bayviewanalytics.com/reports/digitallyestablished-2023.pdf

52.

Seaman

J. E.

Seaman

(2025). Deeply digital: Educational resources in U.S. Higher Education, 2025. Bay View Analytics. https://www.bayviewanalytics.com/reports/deeplydigital2025.pdf

53.

Stovall

J. P.

Laird

S. G.

Welford

Williams

(2019). Student and instructor generated open educational resources compare favorably to a traditional textbook. Journal of Forestry, 117(4), 370–378. https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvz035

54.

Tila

Levy

(2022). Open educational resources adoption reduces textbook costs without sacrificing student performance in business and economics courses at a community college. Social Education Research, 4(1), 122–130. https://doi.org/10.37256/ser.4120231842

55.

Tlili

Garzón

Salha

Huang

Burgos

Denden

Farrell

Farrow

Bozkurt

Amiel

McGreal

López-Serrano

Wiley

(2023). Are open educational resources (OER) and practices (OEP) effective in improving learning achievement? A meta-analysis and research synthesis. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(54), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00424-3

56.

Watson

C. E.

Domizi

D. P.

Clouser

S. A.

(2017). Student and faculty perceptions of OpenStax in high enrollment courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5), 287–304. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.2462

57.

Winitzky-Stephens

J. R.

Pickavance

(2017). Open educational resources and student course outcomes: A multilevel analysis. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(4), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i4.3118

Open Educational Resources in General Psychology: Benefits and Strong Student Acceptance

Abstract

Background

Objective

Method

Results

Conclusion

Teaching Implications

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References