Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

Introduction to psychology disproportionately enrolls beginning college students with significant variability in study skills. Study guides are tools that may help students more effectively prepare for exams.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to compare exam performance for students who completed required versus optional study guides.

Method

Students (n = 169) in asynchronous online Introduction to Psychology completed required study guides for three exams, while 86 students in a comparison section completed a required study guide only for the final exam, though study guides were available for all exams. To control for student motivation, regression analyses incorporated Learning Management System (LMS) engagement metrics, including participation rates, page views, and on-time assignment completion.

Results

Students in the required-guide group significantly outperformed those with optional guides. Regression analyses indicated that study guide completion contributed significantly to exam success even after accounting for the influence of Exam 1 and engagement.

Conclusion

Requiring study guides was associated with improved exam performance, even when controlling for motivation and prior exam scores. These findings suggest that completing a structured study guide may support student success in online courses.

Teaching Implications

Integrating required study guides into courses may improve exams independent of student motivation.

Keywords

study skills unprepared students online learning learning science action research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abdullahi

Gannon

(2012). Improving college students’ success in gateway science courses: Lessons learned from an anatomy and physiology workshop. American Journal of Health Sciences, 3(3), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.19030/ajhs.v3i3.7134

Aguilera-Hermida

A. P.

(2020). College students’ use and acceptance of emergency online learning due to COVID-19. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, Article100011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100011

Bowen

R. W.

Wingo

J. M.

(2012). Predicting success in introductory psychology from early testing: High consistency and low trajectory in multiple-choice test performance. North American Journal of Psychology, 14(3), 419–434.

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Contreras

B. P.

Dovgan

Johnson

Kahng

(2020). Comparing student-created to teacher-created study guides within an interteaching framework. Teaching of Psychology, 48(4), 287–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628320979864

Dickson

K. L.

Miller

M. D.

Devoley

M. S.

(2005). Effect of textbook study guides on student performance in introductory psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 32(1), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top3201_8

Dunlosky

Rawson

K. A.

Marsh

E. J.

Nathan

M. J.

Willingham

D. T.

(2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266

Fiorella

Mayer

R. E.

(2016). Eight ways to promote generative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 717–741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9348-9

Flora

S. R.

Logan

R. E.

(1996). Using computerized study guides to increase performance on general psychology examinations: An experimental analysis. Psychological Reports, 79(1), 235–241. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1996.79.1.235

10.

Hard

B. M.

Lovett

J. M.

Brady

S. T.

(2019). What do students remember about introductory psychology, years later? Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 5(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000136

11.

Henrie

C. R.

Bodily

Larsen

Graham

C. R.

(2018). Exploring the potential of LMS log data as a proxy measure of student engagement. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30, 344–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9161-1

12.

Hickey

D. T.

Robinson

Fiorini

Feng

(2020). Internet-based alternatives for equitable preparation, access, and success in gateway courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 44, Article 100693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100693

13.

Hollingsead

C. C.

Ostrander

R. J.

Schilling

(2004). Study guides: Teacher tips: A review of literature with practical implications. Language Arts Journal of Michigan, 20(2), Article13. https://doi.org/10.9707/2168-149X.1234

14.

Kim

A. S. N.

Shakory

(2017). Early, but not intermediate, evaluative feedback predicts cumulative exam scores in large lecture-style post-secondary education classrooms. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 3(2), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000086

15.

Lawrence

N. K.

(2013). Cumulative exams in the introductory psychology course. Teaching of Psychology, 40(1), 15–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628312465858

16.

Macfadyen

L. P.

Dawson

(2010). Mining LMS data to develop an “early warning system” for educators: A proof of concept. Computers & Education, 54(2), 588–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.008

17.

Motz

Quick

Schroeder

Zook

Gunkel

(2019). The validity and utility of activity logs as a measure of student engagement. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, 300–309. https://doi.org/10.1145/3303772.3303789

18.

Munoz-Organero

Munoz-Merino

P. J.

Kloos

C. D.

(2009). Student behavior and interaction patterns with an LMS as motivation predictors in e-learning settings. IEEE Transactions on Education, 53(3), 463–470. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2009.2027433

19.

Shane-Simpson

Desens

Kleutsch

Obeid

(2022). Relationships among study guide format, academic motivation, self-efficacy, and student grades. Teaching of Psychology, 52(1), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/00986283221134594

20.

Usher

E. L.

Golding

J. M.

Han

Griffiths

C. S.

McGavran

M. B.

Brown

C. S.

Sheehan

E. A.

(2024). Psychology students’ motivation and learning in response to the shift to remote instruction during COVID-19. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 10(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000256

21.

Williamson

(2024). Appendices for requiring study guide completion to remediate exam scores in introduction to psychology. https://osf.io/4zqew/?view_only=73dc850c412d4553b9d7e3f5009e3ed5.

Required vs. Optional Study Guides: Exam Performance in Online Introduction to Psychology

Abstract

Background

Objective

Method

Results

Conclusion

Teaching Implications

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References