Research on multimedia instruction suggests that illustrations aid learning over straight text. Providing students with illustrated instructions may increase comprehension and retention of material.
Objective
We tested if students would remember the material better if it was presented as an infographic where the content was supplemented with illustrations versus reading the same content without illustrations.
Method
We randomly assigned students (N = 114) to either a text-based or an illustrated instruction condition where they learned about three types of study techniques (retrieval practice, spaced practice, and interleaving). After a brief distraction task, all students took a quiz on the material presented.
Results
A multivariate analysis of variance showed a significant main effect for the condition. Students in the illustrated instruction condition scored higher on the quiz than those who were assigned to the text-based condition.
Conclusion
Presenting complex material as an infographic with illustrations may aid learning.
Teaching Implications
Teachers and textbook authors should consider the use of illustrated instructions to convey difficult material, especially bottleneck concepts.
BartoszewskiB. L.GurungR. A. R. (2015). Comparing the relationship of learning techniques and exam score. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1(3), 219–228. https://doi-org/10.1037/stl0000036
2.
BlasimanR. N.DunloskyJ.RawsonK. A. (2017). The what, how much, and when of study strategies: Comparing intended versus actual study behavior. Memory, 25(6), 784–792. https://doi-org/10.1080/09658211.2016.1221974
3.
BolingE.EccariusM. A.SmithK. M.FrickT. (2004). Instructional illustrations: Intended meanings and learner interpretations. Journal of Visual Literacy, 24(2), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/23796529.2004.11674612.
4.
BuiD. C.McDanielM. A. (2015). Enhancing learning during lecture note-taking using outlines and illustrative diagrams. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.03.002
5.
ClarkJ. J.PaivioA. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01320076
6.
CowanN. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(1), 87–114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01003922
DangurV.AvargilS.PeskinU.YehuditJ. (2014). Learning quantum chemistry via a visual-conceptual approach: Students’ bidirectional textual and visual understanding. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(3), 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00025K
9.
DunloskyJ.RawsonK. A.MarshE. J.NathanM. J.WillinghamD. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. https://doi-org/10.1177/1529100612453266
Elena GallagherS.O’DulainM.O’MahonyN.KehoeC.McCarthyF.MorganG. (2017). Instructor-provided summary infographics to support online learning. Educational Media International, 54(2), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2017.1362795
12.
FieldA. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage.
13.
FrickP.SchülerA. (2023). Extending the theoretical foundations of multimedia learning: Activation, integration, and validation occur when processing illustrated text. Learning and Instruction, 87, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101800
14.
GagnierK. M.AtitK.OrmandC. J.ShipleyT. F. (2017). Comprehending 3D diagrams: Sketching to support spatial reasoning. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9(4), 1264–1279. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12233
15.
GurungR. A. R.LandrumR. E. (2013). Bottleneck concepts in psychology: Exploratory first steps. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 12(3), 236–245. https://doi-org/10.2304/plat.2013.12.3.236
16.
GurungR. A. R.DunloskyJ. (2023). Study like a champ: The psychology-based guide to ‘grade A’ study habits. American Psychological Association.
17.
GurungR. A. R.MartinR. C. (2011). Predicting textbook reading: The textbook assessment and usage scale. Teaching of Psychology, 38(1), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628310390913
18.
HarringtonC. M.Gabert-QuillenC. A. (2015). Syllabus length and use of images: An empirical investigation of student perceptions. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1(3), 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000040
19.
HoutsP. S.DoakC. C.DoakL. G.LoscalzoM. J. (2006). The role of pictures in improving health communication: A review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Education and Counseling, 61(2), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2005.05.004
KühlT.MünzerS. (2023). When pictures are not beneficial in multimedia learning: The case of threat-related pictures. Educational Psychology, 43(2–3), 155–172. https://doi-org/10.1080/01443410.2023.2185205
22.
LambA.JohnsonL. (2014). Infographics part 1: Invitations to inquiry. Teacher Librarian, 41(4), 54–58. http://hdl.handle.net/1805/8589
23.
LehmannJ.SeufertT. (2020). The interaction between text modality and the learner’s modality preference influences comprehension and cognitive load. Frontiers of Psychology, 10, Article 2820. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02820
24.
LevieW. H.LentzR. (1982). Effects of text illustrations: A review of research. Educational Communication & Technology Journal, 30(4), 195–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765184
25.
MayerR. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
26.
MayerR. E.GalliniJ. K. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words?Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 715–726. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.715
27.
MocekE. A. (2017). The effects of syllabus design on information retention by at-risk first semester college students. Syllabus, 6(2), 1–15.
28.
NusbaumA. T.SwindellS.PlemonsA. (2021). Kindness at first sight: The role of syllabi in impression formation. Teaching of Psychology, 48(2), 130–143. https://doi-org./10.1177/0098628320959953
29.
OvermanA. A.XuQ.LittleD. (2020). What do students actually pay attention to and remember from a syllabus? An eye tracking study of visually rich and text-based syllabi. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 6(4), 285–300. https://doi.org/https://doi-org./10.1037/stl0000157
30.
PashlerH.McDanielM.RohrerD.BjorkR. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x
31.
RogowskyB. A.CalhounB. M.TallalP. (2015). Matching learning style to instructional method: Effects on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037478
32.
SahitiQ.StampJ. A. (2022). The use of visuals in undergraduate neuroscience education: Recommendations for educators. Teaching of Psychology, 49(3), 276–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/00986283211000326
33.
ScheiterK.EitelA. (2015). Signals foster multimedia learning by supporting integration of highlighted text and diagram elements. Learning and Instruction, 36, 11–26. https://doi-org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.11.002
34.
SchnotzW.BannertM. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning and Instruction, 13, 141–156. https://doi-org10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00017-8
35.
SchnotzW.LudewigU.UlrichM.HorzH.McElvanyN.BaumertJ. (2014). Strategy shifts during learning from texts and picture. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106 (4), 974–989. https://doi.org/https://doi-org/10.1037/a0037054
StoaR.ChuTL(A)GurungR. A. R. (2022). Potential potholes: Predicting challenges and learning outcomes in research methods in psychology courses. Teaching of Psychology, 49(1), 21–29. https://doi-org/10.1177/0098628320979881
38.
SumerackiM.NeibelC.Kuepper-TetzelC.Need KaminskiA. (2023). Ace that test: A student’s guide to learning better. Routledge.
39.
TwengeJ. M. (2023). Generations: The real difference between gen Z, millinnials, gen X, boomers, and silent – and what they mean for America’s future. Atria Books.
40.
WeitenW.HouskaJ. A. (2015). Introductory psychology: Unique challenges and opportunities. In DunnD. S. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of undergraduate psychology education (pp. 289–321). Oxford University Press.
41.
WillinghamD. (2023). How to outsmart your brain: Why learning is hard and how you can make it easy. Gallery Books.
42.
YoungJ. Q.Van MerrienboerJ.DurningS.Ten CateO. (2014). Cognitive load theory: Implications for medical education: AMEE Guide No. 86. Medical Teaching, 36(5), 371–384. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.889290
43.
YozampE. J.SeetoD.GurungR. A. R. (2023). Recommendations for improving university students’ learning from reading. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000354
