Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

Research on the experiences of tenured faculty employed at teaching-intensive institutions is lacking.

Objective

We gathered data regarding how tenured psychology faculty allocate time. We identify variables that predict time allocation and report associations between time allocation and job satisfaction.

Method

We surveyed 386 tenured psychology professors at regional, public universities in the United States. We measured (1) the percentage of time respondents typically allocated and would prefer to allocate to four activities: teaching, research, service, and administration, and (2) job satisfaction and intentions to seek another position.

Results

Time typically allocated to teaching, research, service, and administrative activities was unrelated to job satisfaction. Time allocated to research was associated with intentions to seek another position. Associate professors allocated more time to teaching than did full professors. The discrepancy between typical and preferred time allocation was associated with occupational dissatisfaction.

Conclusion

In contrast to previous studies, we found that allocating a large percentage of work time to teaching activities did not predict lower job satisfaction.

Teaching Implications

Tenured psychology faculty allocated time to teaching activities in ways consistent with their preferences.

Keywords

faculty development interdisplinary issues teacher training

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baker

V. L.

Vo Phan

C. M.

(2019). Faculty development in the United States: Past and present. In Baker

V. L.

Lunsford

L. G.

Neisler

Meghan

Pifer

M. J.

Terosky

A. L.

(Eds.), Success after tenure: Supporting mid-career faculty (pp. 12–28). Stylus.

Baldwin

DeZure

Shaw

Moretto

(2008). Mapping the terrain of mid-career faculty at a research university: Implications for faculty and academic leaders. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 40(5), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.3200/CHNG.40.5.46-55

Barr

C. D.

Spitzmüller

Stuebing

K. K.

(2008). Too stressed out to participate? Examining the relation between stressors and survey response behavior. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13(3), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.13.3.232

Bellas

M. L.

Toutkoushian

R. K.

(1999). Faculty time allocations and research productivity: Gender, race, and family effects. Review of Higher Education, 22(4), 367–390. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.1999.0014

Bichsel

McChesney

Schmidt

(2019). Focus on psychology faculty: Salaries, pay equity, minority representation, and the growth of non-tenure track faculty. College and University Professional Association for Human Resources. https://www.cupahr.org/wp-content/uploads/CUPA-HR-Brief-Focus-on-Faculty-Psychology.pdf

Biernat

Carnes

Filut

Kaatz

(2020). Gender, race, and grant reviews: Translating and responding to research feedback. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(1), 140–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219845921

Blain

K. N.

(2020, May 22). From associate to full professor. Inside Higher Education. https://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2020/05/22/guidance-how-move-associate-full-professor-opinion.

Boyer

E. L.

(1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Bozeman

Gaughan

(2011). Job satisfaction among university faculty: Individual, work, and institutional determinants. Journal of Higher Education, 82(2), 154–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2011.11779090

10.

Cataldi

E. F.

Bradburn

E. M.

Fahimi

Zimbler

(2005). 2004 National Study of Postsecondary Faculty (NSOPF:04): Background Characteristics, Work Activities, and Compensation of Instructional Faculty and Staff: Fall 2003 (NCES 2006-176). National Center for Educational Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/2006176.pdf.

11.

Ceci

S. J.

Ginther

D. K.

Kahn

Williams

W. M.

(2014). Women in academic science: A changing landscape. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 15(3), 75–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100614541236

12.

Colby

Fowler

(2020, December). Data snapshot: IPEDS data on full-time women faculty and faculty of color. American Association of University Professors. https://www.aaup.org/sites/default/files/Dec-2020_Data_Snapshot_Women_and_Faculty_of_Color.pdf

13.

Dahm

P. C.

Glomb

T. M.

Manchester

C. F.

Leroy

(2015). Work–family conflict and self-discrepant time allocation at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 767–792. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038542

14.

Davis

T. E.

Levitt

D. H.

McGlothlin

J. M.

Hill

N. R.

(2006). Perceived expectations related to promotion and tenure: A national survey of CACREP program liaisons. Counselor Education and Supervision, 46(2), 146–156. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.2006.tb00019.x

15.

Dunn

D. S.

Halonen

J. S.

(2022, February 22). The path to full professor: Timing is everything. Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/the-path-to-full-professor-timing-is-everything

16.

Emmert

Rollman

S. A.

(1997). A national survey of tenure and promotion standards in communication departments. Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, (1), 10–23.

17.

French

K. A.

Allen

T. D.

Miller

M. H.

Kim

E. S.

Centeno

(2020). Faculty time allocation in relation to work-family balance, job satisfaction, commitment, and turnover intentions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 120, 103443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103443

18.

Gardner

S. K.

Blackstone

(2013). Putting in your time”: Faculty experiences in the process of promotion to professor. Innovative Higher Education, 38(5), 411–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-012-9252-x

19.

Goyder

(2019). The silent minority: Non-respondents in sample surveys. Routledge.

20.

Guarino

Borden

(2017). Faculty service loads and gender: Are women taking care of the academic family? Research in Higher Education, 58(6), 672–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9454-2

21.

Gurung

R. A. R.

Richmond

Drouin

Landrum

R. E.

Christopher

A. N.

(2019). The past, present, and future of scholarship of teaching and learning in psychology. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 5(2), 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000143

22.

Hagedorn

L. S.

(2000). Conceptualizing faculty job satisfaction: Components, theories, and outcomes. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2000(105), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.10501

23.

Hatchett

G. T.

(2020). Perceived tenure standards, scholarly productivity, and workloads of counselor educators at comprehensive universities. Journal of Counselor Preparation and Supervision, 13(4), 1–24. https://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/jcps/vol13/iss4/9

24.

Hatchett

G. T.

Fuegen

Ripley

(2022). Occupational experiences of associate and full professors of counselor education. Journal of Counselor Preparation and Supervision, 15(4), 1–28. https://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/jcps/vol15/iss4/2

25.

Huang

Gates

A. J.

Sinatra

Barabási

(2020). Historical comparisons of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(9), 4609–4616. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1914221117

26.

Joy

(2006). What should I be doing, and where are they doing it? Scholarly productivity of academic psychologists. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(4), 346–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00020.x

27.

Kulp

A. M.

Wolf-Wendel

L. E.

Smith

D. G.

(2019). The possibility of promotion: How race and gender predict promotion clarity for associate professors. Teachers College Record, 121(5), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811912100507

28.

Lennartz

O’Meara

(2019). Navigating a foggy climate: Women associate professors’ sense of agency and work environment experiences. In Baker

V. L.

Lunsford

L. G.

Neisler

Meghan

Pifer

M. J.

Terosky

A. L.

(Eds.), Success after tenure: Supporting mid-career faculty (pp. 285–310). Stylus.

29.

Link

A. N.

Swann

C. A.

Bozeman

(2008). A time allocation study of university faculty. Economics of Education Review, 27(4), 363–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.04.002

30.

Milem

J. F.

Berger

J. B.

Dey

E. L.

(2000). Faculty time allocation: A study of change over twenty years. Journal of Higher Education, 71(4), 454–475. https://doi.org/10.2307/2649148

31.

Misra

Lundquist

J. H.

Templer

(2012). Gender, work time, and care responsibilities among faculty. Sociological Forum, 27(2), 300–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1573-7861.2012.01319.x

32.

Mitchell

Hesli

(2013). Women don't ask? Women don't say no? Bargaining and service in the political science profession. PS: Political Science & Politics, 46(2), 355–369. httpsss://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513000073 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513000073

33.

National Center for Educational Statistics. (2021). Employees and instructional staff: How many full-time instructional staff not in medical schools, are employed by degree-granting postsecondary institutions? U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/TrendGenerator/app/trend-table/5/12?trending=column&rid=58

34.

Nietzel

M. T.

(2019, April 8). New evidence for the success of comprehensive universities. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaeltnietzel/2019/04/08/new-evidence-for-the-success-of-comprehensive-universities/?sh=291d343f1e56

35.

Odic

Wojcik

E. H.

(2020). The publication gender gap in psychology. American Psychologist, 75(1), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000480

36.

O’Meara

Kuvaeva

Nyunt

(2017). Constrained choices: A view of campus service inequality from annual faculty reports. The Journal of Higher Education, 88(5), 672–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.1257312

37.

Porter

S. R.

(2007). A closer look at faculty service: What affects participation on committees? The Journal of Higher Education, 78(5), 523–541. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4501227 https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2007.0027

38.

Ramsey

Cavallaro

Kiselica

Zila

(2002). Scholarly productivity redefined in counselor education. Counselor Education and Supervision, 42(1), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.2002.tb01302.x

39.

Sabharwal

Corley

E. A.

(2009). Faculty job satisfaction across gender and discipline. Social Science Journal, 46(3), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2009.04.015

40.

Véliz

Gardner

S. K.

(2019). Generational perceptions of promotion and tenure expectations by faculty in a striving university: A quest for legitimacy? Higher Education Quarterly, 73(3), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12195

41.

Wang

Liu

Rao

(2018). The relationship between psychological detachment and employee well-being: The mediating effect of self-discrepant time allocation at work. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2426. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02426

42.

Winslow

(2010). Gender inequality and time allocations among academic faculty. Gender & Society, 24(6), 769–793. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124321038672

43.

Youn

T. I. K.

Price

T. M.

(2009). Learning from the experience of others: The evolution of faculty tenure and promotion rules in comprehensive institutions. Journal of Higher Education, 80, 204– 237. 10.1080/00221546.2009.11772139

Time Allocation and Satisfaction Among Tenured Psychology Faculty at Public,Regional Universities

Abstract

Background

Objective

Method

Results

Conclusion

Teaching Implications

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References