Background: Limited research has compared relationships among student characteristics, study guide format, and academic performance.
Objective: This study investigated relations among student characteristics (motivation, self-efficacy) and academic performance, examined the efficacy of study guide format on performance, and aggregated student recommendations for improving study guides.
Method: Data was collected from three sections of a Child Psychology course (93 students) via a pre-survey, post-survey, and four exams. Students were assigned one study guide for each exam: instructor-created, student-created, class-created, or small group.
Results: Students’ self-efficacy predicted exam and final course performance. Most exam performance did not vary by guide format. However, students who used the small group and student-created guides performed better on Exam 2. Students reported wanting more instructor support on study guide creation.
Conclusion: Student characteristics such as self-efficacy can predict academic performance, but additional research is needed to disentangle relationships between study guide format and performance.
Teaching Implications: Educators should intentionally support students’ self-efficacy throughout the semester. Given that students may prefer less effective study formats, lessons on effective study habits should be integrated into coursework.
BartschR. A.CaseK. A.MeermanH. (2012). Increasing academic self-efficacy in statistics with a live vicarious experience presentation. Teaching of Psychology, 39(2), 133–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628312437699
3.
CetinB. (2015). Academic motivation and self-regulated learning in predicting academic achievement in college. Journal of International Education Research, 11(2), 95–106 https://doi.org/10.19030/jier.v11i2.9190.
4.
ContrerasB. P.DovganK.JohnsonK.KahngS. (2020). Comparing student-created to teacher-created study guides within an interteaching framework. Teaching of Psychology, 48(4), 287–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628320979864
5.
CushenP. J.HackathornJ.Vázquez BrownM. D.RifeS. C.JoyceA. W.SmithE. D.BordieriM. J.AndersonP. W.KarlssonM. E.DanielsJ. (2019). “What’s on the test?”: The impact of giving students a concept-list study guide. Teaching of Psychology, 46(2), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628319834171
6.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G* power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
7.
GlynnS. M.TaasoobshiraziG.BrickmanP. (2009). Science motivation questionnaire: Construct validation with nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20267
HarackiewiczJ. M.BarronK. E.ElliotA. J. (1998). Rethinking achievement goals: When are they adaptive for college students and why?Educational Psychologist, 33(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3301_1
11.
HartwigM. K.DunloskyJ. (2012). Study strategies of college students: Are self-testing and scheduling related to achievement?Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(1), 126–134. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0181-y
12.
HeoJ.HanS. (2018). Effects of motivation, academic stress and age in predicting self-directed learning readiness (SDLR): Focused on online college students. Education and Information Technologies, 23(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9585-2
13.
HollingseadC. C.OstranderR. J.SchillingJ. (2004). Study guides: Teacher tips: A review of literature with practical implications. Language Arts Journal of Michigan, 20(2), 13. https://doi.org/10.9707/2168-149X.1234
14.
HortonS. V.LovittT. C. (1989). Using study guides with three classifications of secondary students. The Journal of Special Education, 22(4), 447–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246698902200406
15.
HoytL. T.CohenA. K.DullB.CastroE. M.YazdaniN. (2021). Constant stress has become the new normal”: Stress and anxiety inequalities among US college students in the time of COVID-19. Journal of Adolescent Health, 68(2), 270–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.10.030
16.
HudsonF.OrmsbeeC. K.MylesB. S. (1994). Study guides: An instructional tool for equalizing student achievement. Intervention in School and Clinic, 30(2), 99–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/105345129403000206
17.
IzuchiM. N.OnyekuruB. U. (2017). Relationships among academic self-concept, academic motivation and academic achievement among college students. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences, 5(2), 93–102.
18.
KaufmanJ. C.AgarsM. D.Lopez-WagnerM. C. (2008). The role of personality and motivation in predicting early college academic success in non-traditional students at a Hispanic-serving institution. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(4), 492–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2007.11.004
19.
KitsantasA.ZimmermanB. J. (2008). College students’ homework and academic achievement: The mediating role of self-regulatory beliefs. Metacognition and Learning, 4(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9028-y
20.
LloydE. P.WalkerR. J.MetzM. A.DiekmanA. B. (2018). Comparing review strategies in the classroom: Self-testing yields more favorable student outcomes relative to question generation. Teaching of Psychology, 45(2), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628318762871
21.
MafinejadM. K.AghiliR.EmamiZ.MalekM.BaradaranH.TaghaviniaM.KhamsehM. E. (2014). Study guides: Effective tools to improve self-directed learning skills of medical students. Acta Medica Iranica, 1(52), 781–785.
22.
MegaC.RonconiL.De BeniR. (2014). What makes a good student? How emotions, self-regulated learning, and motivation contribute to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 121. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033546
23.
PanaderoE.Alonso-TapiaJ.HuertasJ. A. (2012). Rubrics and self-assessment scripts effects on self-regulation, learning and self-efficacy in secondary education. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 806–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.04.007
24.
PintrichP. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667–686. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667
25.
RyderR., & GravesM. F. (2003). Reading and Learning in the Content Areas (2nd ed.). Wiley.
26.
StantonJ. D.SebestaA. J.DunloskyJ. (2021). Fostering metacognition to support student learning and performance. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 20(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-12-0289
27.
ThomasD. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
28.
TrevinoN. N.DeFreitasS. C. (2014). The relationship between intrinsic motivation and academic achievement for first generation Latino college students. Social Psychology of Education, 17(2), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-013-9245-3
29.
WeinsteinY.McDermottK. B.RoedigerH. L. III. (2010). A comparison of study strategies for passages: Rereading, answering questions, and generating questions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16(3), 308–316. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020992
