Just as Long as It’s Not an Essay: The Unessay as a Tool for Engagement in a Cognitive Psychology Course

Abstract

Introduction

Cognitive psychology courses are rich in content that can be useful to broad audiences. Much of the foundational research presented in course texts is conducted in highly constrained laboratory settings, making the concepts difficult to apply or use in the real world.

Statement of the Problem

Students in cognitive psychology classes may not readily notice practical applications for the content. Standard assessments (e.g. written research papers) fail to capture the real-world applications of cognitive phenomena.

Literature Review

Using an applied framework can motivate engagement in cognition. The use of an Unessay project in undergraduate cognitive psychology courses requires students to present a key construct in any format except an essay. Unessay projects originated in the humanities, and are an excellent fit for psychology.

Teaching Implications

The Unessay is a useful vehicle for identifying and presenting the application of a cognitive construct in the real world. Students are required to convey that information in a creative, non-essay format. Instructions, a rubric and examples are provided.

Conclusion

The Unessay is a novel approach to a course project in cognitive psychology that can motivate student interest while aligning with several APA outcomes for psychology majors.

Keywords

creativity applied learning authentic assessment Universal Design for Learning

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Psychological Association (2013). APA guidelines for the undergraduate psychology major 2.0. Author. Retrieved from www.apa.org/ed/resources.html

Aycock

Wright

Hildebrandt

Kenny

Lefebvre

Lin

Mamaclay

Sayson

Stewart

Yuen

(2019). Adapting the “Unessay” for use in computer science Proceedings of the western Canadian conference on computing education (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.1145/3314994.3325073

Beckman

Apps

Bennett

Dalgarno

Kennedy

Lockyer

(2021). Self-regulation in open-ended online assignment tasks: The importance of initial task interpretation and goal setting. Studies in Higher Education, 46(4), 821–835. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1654450

Brauner

Carey

Henriksson

Sunnerhagen

Ehrenborg

(2007). Open‐ended assignments and student responsibility. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 35(3), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.49

Chapman

Gilliam

(1974). Monty Python and the holy Grail.

Conner

D. B.

(1996). From Monty Python to Total Recall: A feature film activity for the cognitive psychology course. Teaching of Psychology, 23(1), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top2301_6

Goodman

S. G.

(2021a). Unessay project overview for cognitive psychology. Figshare Online Resource. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.16918762.v1

Goodman

S. G.

(2021b). Unessay project rubric for cognitive psychology. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.16918765.v1

Green

Bowser

(2006). Observations from the field: Sharing a literature review rubric. Journal of Library Administration, 45(1-2), 185–202. https://doi.org/10.1300/J111v45n01_10

10.

Gronlund

S. D.

Lewandowsky

(1992). Making TV commercials as a teaching aid for cognitive psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 19(3), 158–160. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top1903_7

11.

Hager

L. D.

(2011). Tools for teaching cognitive psychology: Using public service announcements for education on environmental sustainability. Teaching of Psychology, 38(3), 162–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628311411784

12.

Higgenson

(2006). Hey there Delilah [recorded by Plain White T’s]. On All That We Needed [CD]. Hollywood: Fearless Records.

13.

Jakopak

R. P.

Monteith

K. L.

Merkle

B. G.

(2019). Writing science: Improving understanding and communication skills with the “Unessay”. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 100(4), e01610. https://doi.org/10.1002/bes2.1610

14.

Nave

(2021). Universal design for learning UDL in online environments: The HOW of learning. Journal of Developmental Education, 44(3), 34–35.

15.

O’Donnell

D. P.

(2012). The Unessay.

16.

Petkov

Petkova

(2006). Development of scoring rubrics for IS projects as an assessment tool. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 3, 499–510. https://doi.org/10.28945/910

17.

Reddy

Y. M.

Andrade

(2010). A review of rubric use in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(4), 435–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930902862859

18.

Rose

D. H.

Meyer

(2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

19.

Sternberg

R. J.

Dennis

M. J.

(1997). Elaborating cognitive psychology through linkages to psychology as a helping profession. Teaching of Psychology, 24(4), 246–249. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top2404_3

20.

Wiggins

(1990). The case for authentic assessment. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 2(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.7275/ffb1-mm19

21.

Winkelmes

M. A.

Bernacki

Butler

Zochowski

Golanics

Weavil

K. H.

(2016). A teaching intervention that increases underserved college students’ success. Peer Review, 18(1/2), 31–36.

22.

Wood

J. L.

Stringham

(2022). The UnEssay project as an enriching alternative to practical exams in pre-professional and graduate education. Journal of Biological Education, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2022.2047098