Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background:

Students with marginalized identities report a lack of cultural competence among faculty in higher education classrooms. Identity safety cues (ISCs) signal to minority group members that their identities are valued and respected.

Objective:

The purpose of this study was to test for differences in students’ perceptions of their professor, sense of belonging, and academic outcomes when comparing an ISC course with a control course.

Method:

We randomly assigned one of two sections of a large social psychology course to receive ISCs while the other section was taught in a control format. The same professor taught both sections.

Results:

Participants in the ISC class believed their professor was trying to create an inclusive classroom and disapproved of social inequalities more than participants in the control course. These students also reported a higher sense of belonging and fewer absences.

Conclusion:

ISCs were associated with favorable impressions of faculty, a sense of belonging in the classroom, and fewer absences.

Teaching Implications:

Professors can make small adjustments to signal identity safety in their classrooms. These ISCs may foster a sense of belonging and motivation to attend the class for learners with diverse identities.

Keywords

identity safety cues sense of belonging engagement SDO inclusion

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alvarez

S. D.

Schneider

(2008). One college campus’s need for a safe zone: A case study. Journal of Gender Studies, 17(1), 71–74.

Bonet

Walters

B. R.

(2016). High impact practices: Student engagement and retention. College Student Journal, 50(2), 224–235.

Booker

(2016). Connection and commitment: How sense of belonging and classroom community influence degree persistence for African American undergraduate women. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 28(2), 218–229.

Branch

Stein

Huynh

Lazzara

(2018, October). Assessing the value of diversity statements in course syllabi: Annual conference on teaching (ACT). Talk presented at the Society for the Teaching of Psychology ACT, Phoenix, AZ, United States.

Chaney

K. E.

Sanchez

D. T.

(2018). Gender-inclusive bathrooms signal fairness across identity dimensions. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(2), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617737601

Chaney

K. E.

Sanchez

D. T.

Remedios

J. D.

(2016). Organizational identity safety cue transfers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(11), 1564–1576. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216665096

Chaney

K. E.

Sanchez

D. T.

Remedios

J. D.

(2018). We are in this together: How the presence of similarly stereotyped Allies buffer against identity threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79(September), 410–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.09.005

Chemers

M. M.

L. T.

Garcia

B. F.

(2001). Academic self-efficacy and first-year college student performance and adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.55

Cheryan

Meltzoff

A. N.

Kim

(2011). Classrooms matter: The design of virtual classrooms influences gender disparities in computer science classes. Computers and Education, 57(2), 1825–1835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.004

10.

Cheryan

Plaut

V. C.

Davies

P. G.

Steele

C. M.

(2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1045–1060. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016239

11.

Daugherty

(2018). Professor sues university for being ‘punished’ after calling female transgender student ‘sir’. The Hill. https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/416297-professor-sues-university-for-being-punished-after-calling

12.

Dugan

J. P.

Kusel

M. L.

Simounet

D. M.

(2012). Transgender college students: An exploratory study of perceptions, engagement, and educational outcomes. Journal of College Student Development, 53(5), 719–736. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2012.0067

13.

Faul

Erdfelder

Lang

A. G.

Buchner

(2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146

14.

Fuentes

M. A.

Zelaya

D. G.

Madsen

J. W.

(2020). Rethinking the course syllabus: Considerations for promoting equity, diversity, and inclusion. Teaching of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628320959979

15.

Gurin

Dey

E. L.

Hurtado

Gurin

(2002). Diversity and higher education: Theory and impact on educational outcomes. Harvard Educational Review, 72(3), 330–366. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.72.3.01151786u134n051

16.

Hermann

A. D.

Foster

D. A.

Hardin

E. E.

(2010). Does the first week of class matter? A quasi-experimental investigation of student satisfaction. Teaching of Psychology, 37(2), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986281003609314

17.

A. K.

Sidanius

Pratto

Levin

Thomsen

Kteily

Sheehy-Skeffington

(2012). Social dominance orientation: Revisiting the structure and function of a variable predicting social and political attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(5), 583–606. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211432765

18.

Johnson

D. R.

Soldner

Leonard

J. B.

Alvarez

Inkelas

K. K.

Rowan-Kenyon

H. T.

Longerbeam

S. D.

(2007). Examining sense of belonging among first-year undergraduates from different racial/ethnic groups. Journal of College Student Development, 48(5), 525–542. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2007.0054

19.

Johnson

I. R.

Pietri

E. S.

Fullilove

Mowrer

(2019). Exploring identity-safety cues and allyship among Black women students in STEM environments. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684319830926

20.

Kaiser

C. R.

Major

Jurcevic

Dover

T. L.

Brady

L. M.

Shapiro

J. R.

(2013). Presumed fair: Ironic effects of organizational diversity structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(3), 504–519. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030838

21.

Kizilcec

R. F.

Saltarelli

A. J.

(2019). Psychologically inclusive design cues impact women’s participation in STEM education. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300704

22.

Krause

K. L.

Coates

(2008). Students’ engagement in first-year university. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 493–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701698892

23.

Lewis

K. L.

Stout

J. G.

Pollock

S. J.

Finkelstein

N. D.

Ito

T. A.

(2016). Fitting in or opting out: A review of key social-psychological factors influencing a sense of belonging for women in physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020110

24.

Linley

J. L.

Nguyen

Brazelton

G. B.

Becker

Renn

Woodford

(2016). Faculty as sources of support for LGBTQ college students. College Teaching, 64(2), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2015.1078275

25.

McGinley

J. J.

Jones

B. D.

(2014). A brief instructional intervention to increase students’ motivation on the first day of class. Teaching of Psychology, 41(2), 158–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628314530350

26.

McKinney

J. S.

(2005). On the margins: A study of the experiences of transgender college students. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Issues in Education, 3(1), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1300/J367v03n01

27.

Murphy

M. C.

Steele

C. M.

Gross

J. J.

(2007). Signaling threat: How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychological Science, 18(10), 879–885. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01995.x

28.

Petriglieri

J. L.

(2011). Under threat: Responses to and the consequences of threats to individuals’ identities. Academy of Management Review, 36(4), 641–662. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0087

29.

Pietri

E. S.

Hennes

E. P.

Dovidio

J. F.

Brescoll

V. L.

Bailey

A. H.

Moss-Racusin

C. A.

Handelsman

(2019). Addressing unintended consequences of gender diversity interventions on women’s sense of belonging in STEM. Sex Roles, 80(9–10), 527–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0952-2

30.

Pietri

E. S.

Johnson

I. R.

Ozgumus

(2018). One size may not fit all: Exploring how the intersection of race and gender and stigma consciousness predict effective identity-safe cues for Black women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74(June 2017), 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.06.021

31.

Seelman

K. L.

(2014). Recommendations of transgender students, staff, and faculty in the USA for improving college campuses. Gender and Education, 26(6), 618–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2014.935300

32.

Seelman

K. L.

Walls

N. E.

Costello

Steffens

Inselman

Montague-Asp, & Colorado Trans on Campus. (2012). Invisibilities, uncertainties, and unexpected surprises: The experiences of transgender and gender non-conforming students, staff, and faculty at colleges and universities in Colorado. Colorado Trans on Campus.

33.

Sharma

(2012). Adjustments and emotional maturity among first year college students. Pakistan Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 10(2), 32–37.

34.

Sidanius

Pratto

(2001). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741

35.

Steele

C. M.

(1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52(6), 613–629.

36.

Subbaraman

(2020). How #BlackInTheIvory put a spotlight on racism in academia. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01741-7

37.

van Laar

Derks

Ellemers

(2013). Motivation for education and work in young Muslim women: The importance of value for ingroup domains. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 35(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2012.746609

38.

Walton

G. M.

Logel

Peach

J. M.

Spencer

S. J.

Zanna

M. P.

(2015). Two brief interventions to mitigate a “chilly climate” transform women’s experience, relationships, and achievement in engineering. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 468–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037461

39.

Watkins

D. C.

Green

B. L.

Goodson

Guidry

Stanley

(2007). Using focus groups to explore the stressful life events of Black college men. Journal of College Student Development, 48(1), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2007.0009

40.

Wilton

L. S.

Bell

A. N.

Vahradyan

Kaiser

C. R.

(2020). Show don’t tell: Diversity dishonesty harms racial/ethnic minorities at work. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219897149

41.

Woodford

M. R.

Kulick

(2015). Academic and social integration on campus among sexual minority students: The impacts of psychological and experiential campus climate. American Journal of Community Psychology, 55(1–2), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-014-9683-x

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.18 MB

Identity Safety Cues Predict Instructor Impressions,Belonging,and Absences in the Psychology Classroom

Abstract

Background:

Objective:

Method:

Results:

Conclusion:

Teaching Implications:

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material