Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

Graduate admissions in psychology continue to be a popular and competitive venture, with the demand for new graduate student opportunities exceeding the annual supply.

Objective

Our present work was a partial replication and extension of Appleby and Appleby (2006). We added closed- and open-ended questions regarding social media to gauge how graduate admissions committees utilize social media to evaluate applicants.

Method

We asked U.S. graduate admissions directors to answer six open-ended questions and then rate the frequency and fatality/harmfulness of 17 potential applicant errors. From the population of 467 graduate admissions directors, 56 provided complete responses (12.0% response rate).

Results

We examine the closed-ended quantitative results presenting descriptive data and combining the frequency and fatality scales into a scatterplot; outcomes from the open-ended qualitative results provide rich and nuanced advice about graduate admissions errors.

Conclusion

Poorly written application materials are to be avoided (obviously), but the evidence-informed advice offered here is much more nuanced and complex.

Teaching Implications

Mentors and faculty advisors can use information from this study to provide data-informed advice to students interested in improving their chances for admission to graduate programs in psychology, offering specific tips on the most harmful/fatal mistakes to avoid.

Keywords

graduate admissions applicant errors frequency fatality/harmfulness kisses of death

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Psychological Association (2007). Getting in: A step-by-step plan for gaining admission to graduate school in psychology (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association.

American Psychological Association . (2020). Graduate study in psychology: Find a psychology graduate program. https://gradstudy.apa.org/

Appleby

D. C.

Appleby

K. M.

(2006). Kisses of death in the graduate school application process. Teaching of Psychology, 33(1), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top3301_5

Clark

J. R.

Miller

C. A.

Garwood

E. L.

(2020). Rethinking the admissions interview: Piloting multiple mini-interviews in a graduate psychology program. Psychological Reports, 123(35), 1869–1886. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294119896062

Davis

K. M.

Doll

J. F.

Sterner

W. R.

(2018). The importance of personal statements in counselor education and psychology doctoral program applications. Teaching of Psychology, 45(3), 256–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628318779273

Devendorf

A. R.

(2020). Is ‘me-search’ a kiss of death in mental health research? Psychological Services. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000507

Karazsia

B. T.

Smith

(2016). Preparing for graduate-level training in professional psychology: Comparisons across clinical PhD, counseling PhD, and clinical PsyD programs. Teaching of Psychology, 43(4), 305–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628316662760

Karazsia

B. T.

Stavnezer

A. J.

Reeves

J. W.

(2013). Graduate admissions in clinical neuropsychology: The importance of undergraduate training. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 28(7), 711–720. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/act056

Kracen

A. C.

Wallace

J. J.

(2008). Applying to graduate school in psychology: Advice from successful students and prominent psychologists. American Psychological Association.

10.

Michalski

D. S.

Cope

Fowler

G. A.

(2019, March). Graduate study in psychology summary report: Admissions, applications, and acceptances. Office of Graduate and Postgraduate Education and Training, Education Directorate, American Psychological Association. https://www.apa.org/education/grad/survey-data/2019-admissions-applications.pdf

11.

Neimeyer

G. J.

Stevenson

(2008). The virtual advisor: Successful strategies for getting into graduate school in psychology. SAGE.

12.

Prinstein

M. J.

(2013). The portable mentor: Expert guide to a successful career in psychology (2nd ed.). Springer Science + Business Media.

13.

Roberts

M. C.

Ostreko

(2018). GREs, public posting, and holistic admissions for diversity in professional psychology: Commentary on Callahan et al. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 12(4), 286–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000219

14.

Sanders

C. E.

Landrum

R. E.

(2012). The graduate school application: What our students report they know. Teaching of Psychology, 39(2), 128–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628312437697

15.

Schatz

R. T.

Ansburg

P. I.

(2020). Advising psychology majors about graduate school in psychology: Current practices and challenges. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 6(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000165

16.

Strapp

C. M.

Bredimus

Wright

Cochrane

Fields

(2020). Entering the workforce or going to graduate school: Themes in psychology alumni decision making. Teaching of Psychology, 48(2), 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628320977770

17.

Strunk

K. K.

Bailey

L. E.

(2015). The difference one word makes: Imagining sexual orientation in graduate school application essays. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 2(4), 456–462. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000136

18.

Wester

S. R.

Danforth

Olle

(2013). Social networking sites and the evaluation of applicants and students in applied training programs in psychology. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 7(3), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032376

Graduate Admissions in Psychology: Using Quantitative and Qualitative Measures to Understand the Frequency and Fatality of Applicant Errors