College students frequently identify social media sites (SMSs) as in-class distractions, although students continue to use these sites during class. In a technology-driven world, students’ fear of missing out (FOMO) may drive SMS behaviors, whereby classes and study time serve as obstacles to fulfilling one’s social desires.
Objective
The current study investigated whether students’ use of SMSs during class and study time was predicted by demographic characteristics and students’ FOMO.
Method
Participants (N = 198) completed an online survey assessing their media use during class and study time, FOMO, and their perceived advantages/disadvantages of media use.
Results
In-class Twitter and Instagram use were predicted by students’ FOMO, whereas Snapchat and Facebook use were only predicted by age. Age also predicted Snapchat use during study time. Most participants indicated that media was a distraction, while also reporting a range of benefits from media multitasking.
Conclusion
Given that students recognize both benefits and drawbacks of media multitasking, they may trade-off between their desire to engage with learning materials and their desire to stay socially connected with others.
Teaching Implications
Educators can begin to address the socio-emotional needs of students through modifications made to course design and student-centered learning materials.
AltD. (2015). College students' academic motivation, media engagement and fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 49(2015), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.057.
2.
AltD. (2018). Students' wellbeing, fear of missing out, and social media engagement for leisure in higher education learning environments. Current Psychology, 37(1), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9496-1.
3.
BaileyB. P.KonstanJ. A. (2005). On the need for attention-aware systems: Measuring effects of interruption on task performance, error rate, and affective state. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(4), 685–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.12.009.
4.
BellurS.NowakK. L.HullK. S. (2015). Make it our time: In class multitaskers have lower academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 53(2015), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.027.
5.
Brown-KramerC. R. (2020). Improving students' study habits and course performance with a "learning how to learn" assignment. Teaching of Psychology, 48(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628320959926.
6.
CalderwoodC.AckermanP. L.ConklinE. M. (2014). What else do college students “do” while studying? An investigation of multitasking. Computers & Education, 75(2014), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.004.
7.
CarrN. (2010). The shallows: What the internet is doing to our brains. W. W. Norton.
8.
CarrierL. M.CheeverN. A.RosenL. D.BenitezS.ChangJ. (2009). Multitasking across generations: Multitasking choices and difficulty ratings in three generations of Americans. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 483–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.10.012.
9.
CassidyG.MacDonaldR. A. R. (2007). The effect of background music and background noise on the task performance of introverts and extraverts. Psychology of Music, 35(3), 517–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735607076444.
10.
DemirbilekM.TalanT. (2018). The effect of social media multitasking on classroom performance. Active Learning in Higher Education, 19(2), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417721382.
11.
DontreA. J. (2020). The influence of technology on academic distraction: a review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3(3), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.229.
12.
DownsE.TranA.McMenemyR.AbegazeN. (2015). Exam performance and attitudes toward multitasking in six, multimedia-multitasking classroom environments. Computers & Education, 86(2015), 250–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.008.
13.
ElhaiJ. D.LevineJ. C.AlghraibehA. M.AlafnanA. A.AldraiweeshA. A.HallB. J. (2018). Fear of missing out: Testing relationships with negative affectivity, online social engagement, and problematic smartphone use. Computers in Human Behavior, 89(2018), 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.020.
14.
ElhaiJ. D.LevineJ. C.DvorakR. D.HallB. J. (2016). Fear of missing out, need for touch, anxiety and depression are related to problematic smartphone use. Computers in Human Behavior, 63(2016), 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.079.
15.
EllisonN. B.SteinfieldC.LampeC. (2007). The benefits of facebook "friends:" Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x.
16.
EriksonE. (1968). Identity: Youth in crisis. W. W. Norton.
17.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.
18.
FewkesA. M.McCabeM. (2012). Facebook. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28(3), 92–98.
19.
FlaniganA. E.BabchukW. A. (2015). Social media as academic quicksand: A phenomenological study of student experiences in and out of the classroom. Learning and Individual Differences, 44(2015), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.11.003.
20.
FlaniganA. E.BabchukW. A. (2020). Digital distraction in the classroom: Exploring instructor perceptions and reactions. Teaching in Higher Education, 2020(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1724937.
21.
FoehrU. G. (2006). Media multitasking among American youth: Prevalence, predictors, and pairings (No 7592). Kaiser Family Foundation. https://www.kff.org/entmedia/upload/7592.pdf.
22.
FoxA. B.RosenJ.CrawfordM. (2009). Distractions, distractions: Does instant messaging affect college students' performance on a concurrent reading comprehension task?CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(1), 51–53. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2008.0107.
23.
GangadharbatlaH. (2008). FacebookMe. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 8(2), 5–15.
24.
GikasJ.GrantM. M. (2013). Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones & social media. The Internet and Higher Education, 19(1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.06.002.
25.
GuptaN.IrwinJ. D. (2016). In-class distractions: The role of Facebook and the primary learning task. Computers in Human Behavior, 55(2016), 1165–1178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.022.
26.
HandleyG.LebedA.MorlingB. (2021). Self-graded homework helps students learn and promotes accurate metacognition. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000287.
27.
HansonT. L.DrumhellerK.MallardJ.McKeeC.SchlegelP. (2010). Cell phones, text messaging, and Facebook: Competing time demands of today's college students. College Teaching, 59(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2010.489078.
28.
HetlandL. (2000). Listening to music enhances spatial-temporal reasoning: Evidence for the "Mozart Effect". Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34(3/4), 105–148.
HuY.ManikondaL.KambhampatiS. (2014). What we Instagram: a first analysis of Instagram photo content and user types. AAAI Press.Proceedings from the Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media
31.
HwangY.JeongS.-H. (2018). Multitasking and task performance: Roles of task hierarchy, sensory interference, and behavioral response. Computers in Human Behavior, 81(2018), 161–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.008.
32.
JacobsenW. C.ForsteR. (2011). The wired generation: Academic and social outcomes of electronic media use among university students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 14(5), 275–280. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0135.
33.
JongB.-S.LaiC.-H.HsiaY.-T.LinT.-W.LiaoY.-S. (2014). An exploration of the potential educational value of Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 32(2014), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.007.
JuncoR. (2012b). Too much face and not enough books: The relationship between multiple indices of Facebook use and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.026.
36.
JuncoR. (2015). Student class standing, Facebook use, and academic performance. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 36(2015), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.11.001.
37.
KimY.WangY.OhJ. (2016). Digital media use and social engagement: How social media and smartphone use influence social activities of college students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 19(4), 264–269. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0408.
38.
LauW. W. F. (2017). Effects of social media usage and social media multitasking on the academic performance of university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 68(2017), 286–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.043.
39.
LeeE.LeeJ.-A.MoonJ. H.SungY. (2015). Pictures speak louder than words: Motivations for using Instagram. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 18(9), 552–556. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0157.
LevineL. E.WaiteB. M.BowmanL. L. (2007). Electronic media use, reading, and academic distractibility in college youth. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(4), 560–566. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.9990.
42.
MayerR. E.MorenoR. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6.
43.
MbatiL. (2013). Online social media applications for constructivism and observational learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(5), 166–185. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i5.1579.
44.
MilyavskayaM.SaffranM.HopeN.KoestnerR. (2018). Fear of missing out: prevalence, dynamics, and consequences of experiencing FOMO. Motivation and Emotion, 42(5), 725–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9683-5.
45.
PattersonM. C. (2017). A naturalistic investigation of media multitasking while studying and the effects on exam performance. Teaching of Psychology, 44(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628316677913.
PrzybylskiA. K.MurayamaK.DeHaanC. R.GladwellV. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1841–1848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.014.
50.
RalphB. C. W.ThomsonD. R.CheyneJ. A.SmilekD. (2014). Media multitasking and failures of attention in everyday life. Psychological Research, 78(5), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-013-0523-7.
51.
RauscherF. H.ShawG. L.KyC. N. (1993). Music and spatial task performance. Nature, 365(6447), 611.
52.
SanaF.WestonT.CepedaN. J. (2013). Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers. Computers & Education, 62(2013), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.003.
53.
SeoH.HoustonJ. B.KnightL. A. T.KennedyE. J.InglishA. B. (2014). Teens' social media use and collective action. New Media & Society, 16(6), 883–902. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813495162.
54.
Shane-SimpsonC.ManagoA.GaggiN.Gillespie-LynchK. (2018). Why do college students prefer Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram? Site affordances, tensions between privacy and self-expression, and implications for social capital. Computers in Human Behavior, 86(2018), 276–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.041.
ThompsonW. F.SchellenbergE. G.HusainG. (2001). Arousal, mood, and the Mozart effect. Psychological Science, 12(3), 248–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00345.
57.
Van Den BeemtA.ThurlingsM.WillemsM. (2020). Towards an understanding of social media use in the classroom: a literature review. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 29(1), 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1695657.
58.
WangY.NiiyaM.MarkG.ReichS. M.WarschauerM. (2015, February). Coming of age (Digitally) an ecological view of social media use among college students. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing (pp. 571–582).
59.
WangZ.TchernevJ. M. (2012). The “myth” of media multitasking: Reciprocal dynamics of media multitasking, personal needs, and gratifications. Journal of Communication, 62(3), 493–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01641.x.
60.
XuS.WangZ.DavidP. (2016). Media multitasking and well-being of university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 55(2016), 242–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.040.
61.
YangC.-c.BrownB. B. (2015). Factors involved in associations between Facebook use and college adjustment: Social competence, perceived usefulness, and use patterns. Computers in Human Behavior, 46(2015), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.015.
62.
YangC.LeeY. (2018). Interactants and activities on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter: Associations between social media use and social adjustment to college. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2018). https://doi/org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1440233.
