Multi-Tiered System of Supports: An Ecological Approach to School Psychology Service Delivery

Abstract

Introduction:

School psychologists work to support the academic, behavioral, and social-emotional well-being of students in schools. Their roles have become increasingly diverse in recent years due to the implementation of Multi-tiered System of Supports (MTSS) frameworks in schools throughout the United States.

Statement of the Problem:

Despite a national shortage of school psychologists, psychology students are often unaware of the profession or may have an outdated understanding of the role of school psychologists. Psychology students may also be unfamiliar with the MTSS framework, which promotes research-based, data-driven, equitable, and culturally responsive practices through a systemic, ecological approach to service delivery in schools.

Literature Review:

We review the main components of a typical MTSS prevention and intervention framework and describe the various roles of school psychologists and other key stakeholders within this model.

Teaching Implications:

This review and supporting resources can be used to introduce the field of school psychology to students. Additionally, it can be used to generate discussions regarding the provision of evidence-based and equitable academic and psychological services to students in the school through an ecological model.

Conclusion:

This article will help students gain an understanding of school psychologists’ roles within a current MTSS educational service delivery model.

Keywords

career issues for students prevention and intervention multi-tiered system of supports school psychology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berkeley

S. B.

Scanlon

Bailey

T. R.

Sutton

J. C.

Sacco

D. M.

(2020). A snapshot of RTI implementation a decade later: New picture, same story. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(5), 332–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420915867

Bocanegra

J. O.

Gubi

A. A.

Callan

G. L.

Grapin

S. L.

McCall

(2019). A lack of exposure to school psychology within undergraduate psychology coursework. Teaching of Psychology, 46(3), 208–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628319848876

Bocanegra

J. O.

Gubi

A. A.

Fan

C.-H.

Hansmann

P. R.

(2015). Undergraduate psychology students’ knowledge and exposure to school psychology: Suggestions for diversifying the field. Contemporary School Psychology, 19, 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-015-0046-x

Brown-Chidsey

Bickford

(2016). Practical handbook of multi-tiered systems of support: Building academic and behavioral success in schools. Guilford.

Brown-Chidsey

Bronaugh

McGraw

(2009). RTI in the classroom: Guidelines and recipes for success. Guilford.

Brown-Chidsey

Steege

M W.

(2010). Response to intervention: Principles and strategies for effective practice (2nd ed.). Guilford.

Burns

M. K.

Gibbons

(2012). Implementing response-to-intervention in elementary and secondary schools: Procedures to assure scientific-based practices (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Burns

M. K.

VanDerHeyden

A. M.

Boice

C. H.

(2008). Best practices in intensive academic interventions. In Thomas

Grimes

(Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (5th ed.) (pp. 1151–1162). National Association of School Psychologists.

Cook

B. G.

Tankersley

Landrum

T. J.

(2009). Determining evidence-based practices in special education. Exceptional Children, 75(3), 365–383. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F001440290907500306

10.

Deno

S. L.

(2016). Data-based decision making. In Jimerson

Burns

M. K.

VanDerHeyden

A. M.

, (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention (2nd ed., pp. 9–28). Springer.

11.

Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 6301. (1965). https://www2.ed.gov/documents/essa-act-of-1965.pdf

12.

Every Student Succeeds Act, 20 U.S.C. § 6301. (2015). https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/1177

13.

Fernandez

Inserra

(2013). Disproportionate classification of ESL students in U.S. Special education. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, 17(2), 1–22.

14.

Fletcher

J. M.

Vaughn

(2009). Response to intervention: Preventing and remediating academic difficulties. Child Development Perspectives, 3(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00072.x

15.

Fuchs

L. S.

(2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.41.1.4

16.

Garbacz

A. S.

(2020). Establishing family-school partnerships in school psychology: Critical skills. Routledge.

17.

Gersten

Compton

Connor

C. M.

Dimino

Santoro

Linan-Thompson

Tilly

W. D.

(2008). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to Intervention and multi-tier intervention for reading in the primary grades. A practice guide (NCEE 2009-4045). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/PracticeGuide/rti_reading_pg_021809.pdf

18.

Harlacher

Nelson Walker

Sanford

(2010). The “I” in RTI: Research-based factors for intensifying instruction. Teaching Exceptional Children, 42, 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F004005991004200604

19.

Hosp

M. K.

Hosp

J. L.

Howell

K. W.

(2016). The ABC’s of CBM: A practical guide to curriculum-based measurement (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.

20.

Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act. (2004). Public Law 108-446 (20 U.S.C. 1400 *et seq*.).

21.

Jimerson

S. R.

Burns

M. K.

VanDerHeyden

A. M.

(2016). Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of multi-tiered systems of support (2nd ed.). Springer.

22.

Jones

R. E.

Yssel

Grant

(2012). Reading instruction in tier 1: Bridging the gaps by nesting evidence-based interventions within differentiated instruction. Psychology in the Schools, 49(3), 210–218. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21591

23.

Keller-Margulis

M. A.

(2012). Fidelity of implementation framework: A critical need for response to intervention models. Psychology in the Schools, 49(4), 342–352. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21602

24.

Marchand-Martella

N. E.

Ruby

S. F.

Martella

R. C.

(2007). Intensifying reading instruction for students within a three-tier model: Standard-protocol and problem solving approaches within a Response-to-Intervention (RTI) system. TEACHING Exceptional Children Plus, 3, Article 2.

25.

McIntosh

Goodman

(2016). Integrated multi-tiered systems of support: Blending RTI and PBIS. Guilford Press.

26.

Mellard

McKnight

Jordan

(2010). RTI tier structures and instructional intensity. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25(4), 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2010.00319.x

27.

Merrell

K. W.

Buchanan

(2006). Intervention selection in school-based practice: Using public health models to enhance systems capacity of schools. School Psychology Review, 35(2), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2006.12087985

28.

National Association of School Psychologists. (2013). Racial and ethnic disproportionality in education [Position statement]. https://www.nasponline.org/research-and-policy/policy-priorities/position-statements

29.

National Association of School Psychologists. (2014). Prevention and wellness promotion [Position Statement]. https://www.nasponline.org/research-and-policy/policy-priorities/position-statements

30.

National Association of School Psychologists. (2016a). Ensuring high quality, comprehensive, and integrated specialized instructional support services [Position statement]. https://www.nasponline.org/research-and-policy/policy-priorities/position-statements

31.

National Association of School Psychologists. (2016b). School psychologists’ involvement in assessment [Position statement]. https://www.nasponline.org/research-and-policy/policy-priorities/position-statements

32.

National Association of School Psychologists. (2017a). Shortages in school psychology: Challenges to meeting the growing needs of U.S. students and schools [Research summary]. https://www.nasponline.org/research-and-policy/nasp-research-center/research-summaries

33.

National Association of School Psychologists. (2017b). Leveraging essential school practices, ESSA, MTSS, and the NASP practice model: A crosswalk to help every school and student succeed [Policy brief]. https://www.nasponline.org/research-and-policy/policy-priorities/relevant-law/the-every-student-succeeds-act/essa-crosswalk

34.

National Association of School Psychologists. (2017c). Safe and supportive schools for LGBTQ+ youth [Position statement]. https://www.nasponline.org/research-and-policy/policy-priorities/position-statements

35.

National Association of School Psychologists. (2019). School–family partnering to enhance learning: Essential elements and responsibilities [Position Statement]. https://www.nasponline.org/research-and-policy/policy-priorities/position-statements

36.

National Association of School Psychologists. (2020). The professional standards of the national association of school psychologists. https://www.nasponline.org/standards-and-certification/nasp-2020-professional-standards-adopted

37.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2020a). Reading performance. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cnb.asp

38.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2020b). Mathematics performance. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cnc.asp

39.

National Center on Intensive Intervention. (2020a). Academic screening tools chart. https://charts.intensiveintervention.org/bscreening

40.

National Center on Intensive Intervention. (2020b). Behavior screening tools chart. https://charts.intensiveintervention.org/ascreening

41.

National Center on Intensive Intervention. (2020c). Academic intervention tools chart. https://charts.intensiveintervention.org/aintervention

42.

National Center on Intensive Intervention. (2020d). Behavioral intervention tools chart. https://charts.intensiveintervention.org/bintervention

43.

No Child Left Behind Act, 20 U.S.C. § 6301. (2001). https://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/107-110.pdf

44.

Rattan

S. M.

Furey

(2021). Multi-tiered system of supports: An ecological approach to school psychology service delivery (Supplemental Instructional Materials and Resources). https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5348345.v1

45.

Riley-Tillman

T. C.

Burns

M. K.

Gibbons

(2013). RTI applications, Volume 2: Assessment, analysis, and decision making. Guilford.

46.

Stoiber

K. C.

(2014). A comprehensive framework for multitiered systems of support in school psychology. In Harrison

P. L.

Thomas

(Eds.), Best practices in school psychology: Data-based and collaborative decision making (pp. 41–70). National Association of School Psychologists.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB

0.01 MB

0.02 MB

0.01 MB