The statistical package chosen to aid in teaching quantitative methods is at the instructor’s discretion, but little research has investigated student attitude toward these different packages. This study compared Google Sheets, a spreadsheet package similar to Microsoft Excel, and a traditional package, SPSS, to determine which of the two programs students preferred to use. One hundred and thirty-nine students enrolled in a quantitative methods course completed surveys at the middle and end of the semester during Spring 2016 and Fall 2016. The results suggested Google Sheets was preferred to SPSS at both time points, and attitudes toward Google Sheets improved over time. Further research could investigate the perspectives of students in other levels of experience with statistics and other statistical packages.
AikenL. S.WestS. G.MillsapR. E. (2008). Doctoral training in statistics, measurement, and methodology in psychology: Replication and extension of Aiken, West, Sechrest, and Reno’s (1990) survey of PhD programs in North America. American Psychologist, 63(1), 32–50. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.1.32
2.
AikenL. S.WestS. G.SechrestL.RenoR. R. (1990). Graduate training in statistics, methodology, and measurement in psychology: A survey of PhD programs in North America. American Psychologist, 45(6), 721–734. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.45.6.721
3.
BaloğluM. (2003). Individual differences in statistics anxiety among college students. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(5), 855–865. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00076-4
4.
ConnersF. A.McCownS. M.Roskos-EwoldsonB. (1998). Unique challenges in teaching undergraduate statistics. Teaching of Psychology, 25(1), 40–42. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top2501_12
5.
CounsellA.CribbieR. A.HarlowL. L. (2016). Increasing literacy in quantitative methods: The key to the future of Canadian psychology. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 57(3), 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000056
6.
DahlmanK. A.GeisingerK. F. (2015). The prevalence of measurement in undergraduate psychology curricula across the United States. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1(3), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000030
7.
DavidsonH.JabbariY.PattonH.O’HaganF.PetersK.CribbieR. (2019). Statistical software use in Canadian universities: Current trends and future directions. Teaching of Psychology, 46(3), 246–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628319853940
8.
DierkerL.CooperJ.AlexanderJ.SelyaA.RoseJ. (2015). Evaluating access: A comparison of demographic and disciplinary characteristics of students enrolled in a traditional introductory statistics course vs. a multidisciplinary, project-based course. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 4(1), 22.
9.
DierkerL.KaparakisE.RoseJ.SelyaA.BeveridgeD. (2012). Strength in numbers: A multidisciplinary, project-based course in introductory statistics. Journal of Effective Teaching, 12(2), 4–14.
10.
DunnD. S. (2000). Letter exchanges on statistics and research methods: Writing, responding, and learning. Teaching of Psychology, 27(2), 128–130.
11.
DunnT. J.BaguleyT.BrunsdenV. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105(3), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12046
12.
EversonM.ZiefflerA.GarfieldJ. (2008). Implementing new reform guidelines in teaching introductory college statistics courses. Teaching Statistics, 30(3), 66–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9639.2008.00331.x
13.
GolinskiC.CribbieR. A. (2009). The expanding role of quantitative methodologists in advancing psychology. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 50(2), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015180
14.
Google. Released2017. Google sheets. Google, LLC.
15.
GravetterF. J.WallnauL. B.ForzanoL-A. B. (2018). Essentials of statistics for the behavioral sciences (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.
16.
GundersonE. A.RamirezG.LevineS. C.BeilockS. L. (2012). The role of parents and teachers in the development of gender-related math attitudes. Sex Roles, 66(3–4), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9996-2
17.
HackbarthG.GroverV.YiM. Y. (2003). Computer playfulness and anxiety: Positive and negative mediators of the system experience effect on perceived ease of use. Information & Management, 40(3), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00006-X
18.
HamakerE. L.KuiperR. M.GrasmanR. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038889
19.
HarlowL. L. (2013). Teaching quantitative psychology. In LittleT. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of quantitative methods (pp. 105–117). Oxford University Press.
20.
HarlowL. L. (2014). The essence of multivariate thinking: Basic themes and methods (2nd ed.). Routledge.
21.
HarlowL. L.BurkholderG. J.MorrowJ. A. (2002). Evaluating attitudes, skill, and performance in a learning-enhanced quantitative methods course: A structural modeling approach. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(3), 413–430. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0903_6
22.
HelmanS.HorswillM. S. (2002). Does the introduction of non-traditional teaching techniques improve psychology undergraduates’ performance in statistics?Psychology Learning & Teaching, 2(1), 12–16. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2002.2.1.12
23.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
24.
HulsizerM. R.WoolfL. M. (2009). A guide to teaching statistics: Innovations and best practices (Vol. 10). John Wiley & Sons.
KavanaghM. H.DrennanL. (2008). What skills and attributes does an accounting graduate need? Evidence from student perceptions and employer expectations. Accounting & Finance, 48(2), 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2007.00245.x
28.
KunickiZ. J.ZambrottaN. S.TateM. C.SurruscoA. R.RisiM. M.HarlowL. L. (2019). Keep your stats in the cloud! Evaluating the use of Google Sheets to teach quantitative methods. Journal of Statistics Education, 27(3), 188–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2019.1665485
29.
LomaxR. G.MoosaviS. A. (2002). Using humor to teach statistics: Must they be orthogonal?Understanding Statistics: Statistical Issues in Psychology, Education, and the Social Sciences, 1(2), 113–130. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328031US0102_04
30.
NeumannD. L.HoodM.NeumannM. M. (2009). Statistics? You must be joking: The application and evaluation of humor when teaching statistics. Journal of Statistics Education, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2009.11889525
31.
NieY.LauS. (2010). Differential relations of constructivist and didactic instruction to students’ cognition, motivation, and achievement. Learning and Instruction, 20(5), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.04.002
32.
OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2004). Academic procrastination and statistics anxiety. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042000160384
33.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.WilsonV. A. (2003). Statistics anxiety: Nature, etiology, antecedents, effects, and treatments—A comprehensive review of the literature. Teaching in Higher Education, 8(2), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356251032000052447
34.
OrdA. S.RipleyJ. S.HookJ.ErspamerT. (2016). Teaching statistics in APA-accredited doctoral programs in clinical and counseling psychology: A syllabi review. Teaching of Psychology, 43(3), 221–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628316649478
RosseelY. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
41.
RuggeriK. (2011). The impact of misunderstanding the nature of statistics. Psychology Teaching Review, 17(1), 35–40.
42.
SchachtS.StewartB. J. (1990). What’s funny about statistics? A technique for reducing student anxiety. Teaching Sociology, 18(1), 52–56.
43.
SchneiderK. N.BeckerL. L.BergG. G. (2017). Beyond the mechanics of spreadsheets: Using design instruction to address spreadsheet errors. Accounting Education, 26(2), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2016.1274912
44.
SchutzP. A.DrogoszL. M.WhiteV. E.DistefanoC. (1998). Prior knowledge, attitude, and strategy use in an introduction to statistics course. Learning and Individual Differences, 10(4), 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(99)80124-1
45.
SosaG. W.BergerD. E.SawA. T.MaryJ. C. (2011). Effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction in statistics: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 97–128. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310378174
46.
SteigerJ. H.LindJ. C. (1980). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, Iowa, United States.
47.
WarnerC. B.MeehanA. M. (2001). Microsoft Excel™ as a tool for teaching basic statistics. Teaching of Psychology, 28(4), 295–298. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328023TOP2804_11
48.
ZeedykM. S. (2006). Detective work on Statistics Street: Teaching statistics through humorous analogy. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 5(2), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2005.5.2.97
