Deception detection is a topic covered in many psychology and communication courses. We designed and implemented an engaging class activity to facilitate the students’ learning of several key concepts related to sender and receiver variability in lie detection. The pedagogical effectiveness of the activity was measured. In line with previous research, the students had difficulty acknowledging and correcting their own biases. However, the teaching activity was successful in correcting their general beliefs and facilitating learning.
EkmanP. (2009). Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
9.
Global Deception Research Team. (2006). A world of lies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 60–74. doi:10.1177/0022022105282295
10.
LevineT. R. (2010). A few transparent liars. Explaining 54% accuracy in deception detection experiments. In SalmonC. (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 34, pp. 41–61). New York, NY: Routledge.
11.
LevineT. R. (2014). Truth-default theory (TDT): A theory of human deception and deception detection. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33, 378–392. doi:10.1177/0261927X14535916
12.
LevineT. R. (2016). Examining sender and judge variability in honesty assessments and deception detection accuracy: Evidence for a transparent liar but no evidence of deception general ability. Communication Research Reports, 33, 188–194. doi:10.1080/08824096.2016.1186629
13.
LevineT. R.ParkH. S.McCornackS. A. (1999). Accuracy in detecting truths and lies: Documenting the “veracity effect.”Communication Monographs, 66, 125–144. doi:10.1080/03637759909376468
14.
LevineT. R.SerotaK. B.ShulmanH.ClareD. D.ParkH. S.ShawA. S.…LeeJ. H. (2011). Sender demeanor: Individual differences in sender believability have a powerful impact on deception detection judgments. Human Communication Research, 37, 377–403. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2011.01407.x
15.
MasipJ. (2017). Deception detection: State of the art and future prospects. Psicothema, 29, 149–159. doi:10.7334/psicothema2017.34
16.
MeyerP. (2010). Liespotting: Proven techniques to detect deception. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
17.
O’SullivanM.EkmanP. (2004). The wizards of deception detection. In GranhagP. A.StrömwallL. A. (Eds.), The detection of deception in forensic contexts (pp. 269–286). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
18.
ProninE. (2007). Perception and misperception of bias in human judgment. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 37–43. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.001
19.
ProninE.LinD. Y.RossL. (2002). The bias blind spot: Perceptions of bias in self versus others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 369–381. doi:10.1177/0146167202286008
20.
SimmonsJ. P.NelsonL. D.SimonsohnU. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366. doi:10.1177/0956797611417632
