What do university students understand about faculty work? Undergraduate (mostly first-year) students (N = 317) at a research university gave definitions of tenure, estimated how much time faculty spend teaching, and rated fictional faculty members. Most students could define tenure but could not describe how it is earned or its role in academic freedom. Students overestimated the time faculty spend on teaching and underestimated time spent on research. Finally, students who assumed that fictional faculty taught more courses also assumed they had higher status. By comparison, faculty respondents (N = 645) who read the same fictional descriptions assumed higher teaching loads went with lower status markers. As they acculturate to life at a research university, first-year students could benefit from learning about faculty research roles and the value of academic freedom.
BarefootB. O. (2005). Current institutional practices in the first college year. In UpcraftM. L.GardnerJ. N.BarefootB. O. (Eds.), Challenging and supporting the first-year student: A handbook for improving the first year of college (pp. 47–66). Indianapolis, IN: Jossey-Bass.
3.
BrckaLorenzA.LairdT. N.YuhasB.StricklandJ.FassettK. (2018). Faculty types and effective teaching: A cautionary exploration of how faculty spend their time. Paper presented at the 2018 annual meeting of American Educational Research Association (AERA), New York, NY.
4.
The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education (n.d.). About Carnegie classification. Retrieved fromhttp://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/
5.
GrossmanP. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
6.
JASP Team (2017). JASP (Version 0.8.4) [Computer software]. Retrieved fromhttps://jasp-stats.org
KezarA.MaxeyD. (2016). Recognizing the need for a new faculty model. In KezarA.MaxeyD. (Eds.), Envisioning the faculty for the 21st century: Moving to a mission-oriented and learner-centered model (pp. 23–41). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
9.
LandrumR. E.NelsenL. R. (2002). The undergraduate research assistantship: An analysis of the benefits. Teaching of Psychology, 29, 15–19. doi:10.1207/S15328023TOP2901_04
10.
MonksJ. (2004). The relative earnings of contingent faculty in higher education(CHERI Working Paper #59). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, ILR school site. Retrieved fromhttp://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cheri/22/
11.
MorlingB.LeeJ. M. (2020). Are associate professors better than associate teaching professors? Student and faculty perceptions of faculty titles. Teaching of Psychology, 47, 50–57.
12.
National Survey of Student Engagement. (2017). Engagement insights: Survey findings on the quality of undergraduate education. NSSE Annual results 2017. Bloomington: Indiana University. Retrieved fromhttp://nsse.indiana.edu/html/annual_results.cfm
SadlerP. M.SonnertG.CoyleH. P.Cook-SmithN.MillerJ. L. (2013). The influence of teachers’ knowledge on student learning in middle school science classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 50, 1020–1049. doi:10.3102/0002831213477680
15.
ShulmanL. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/1175860
16.
TeichlerU.ArimotoA.CummingsW. K. (2013). The changing academic profession: Major findings of a comparative survey. Philadelphia, PA: Springer.
17.
TurnerR.MorrisonD.CottonD.ChildS.StevensS.NashP.KnealeP. (2017). Easing the transition of first year undergraduates through an immersive induction module. Teaching in Higher Education, 27, 805–821. doi:10.1080/13562517.2017.1301906
18.
UpcraftM. L.GardnerJ. N.BarefootB. O. (Eds.). (2005). Challenging and supporting the first-year student: A handbook for improving the first year of college. Indianapolis, IN: Jossey-Bass.
19.
WaymentH. A.DicksonK. L. (2008). Increasing student participation in undergraduate research benefits students, faculty, and department. Teaching of Psychology, 35, 194–197. doi:10.1080/00986280802189213
20.
WhillansA. V.HopeS. E.WylieL. J.ZhaoB.SouzaM. J. (2018). A program to improve student engagement at research-focused universities. Teaching of Psychology, 45, 172–178. doi:10.1177/0098628318762905
