Skill in statistical analysis and interpretation are key areas of expertise for psychology majors seeking graduate school admittance and future employment. However, students can be reluctant to engage in their statistics course and may struggle to find success. One possible way to increase engagement and student learning is to teach in a way that taps multiple areas of cognitive ability through organizing instruction according to Robert Sternberg’s theory of triarchic intelligence. This approach to instruction has been shown to be successful in the author’s courses and resulted in a pattern of achievement on the psychology subtest of the Area Concentration Achievement Test (ACAT) that is above what would be predicted by the students’ general aptitude scores.
BoyleE. A.MacArthurE. W.ConnollyT. M.HaineyT.ManeaM.KärkiA.van RosmalenP. (2014) A narrative literature review of games, animations, and simulations to teach research methods and statistics. Computers & Education, 54, 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.004
2.
BrightonC.HertbergH.MoonT.TomlinsonC.CallahanC. (2005). The feasibility of high-end learning in a diverse middle school[Research Monograph RM05210]. Charlottesville: The University of Virginia, National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
3.
BrodyN. (2003a). Construct validation of the Sternberg triarchic abilities test: Comment and reanalysis. Intelligence, 31, 319–329. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(1)00087-3
4.
BrodyN. (2003b). What Sternberg should have concluded. Intelligence, 31, 339–342. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(02)00190-3
5.
BrunerJ. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
ChewP. K. H.DillonD. B. (2014). Statistics anxiety update: Refining the construct and recommendations for a new research agenda. Psychological Science, 9, 196–208. doi:10.1177/1745691613518077
7.
ChewP. K. H.SwinbourneA.DillonD. B. (2017). An absence of attentional bias: Statistics anxiety is unique among anxieties. Journal of Articles in Support of the Null Hypothesis, 13, 91–111.
8.
CorcoranM. (2016, February). Illustrating the central limit theorem. The Mathematics Teacher, 109, 456–462.
9.
CraikF. I. M.TulvingE. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268–294.
10.
DavisA.MirickR. G. (2015). MSW students’ perceptions of relevance and application of statistics: Implications for field education. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 35, 317–336. doi:10.1080/08841233.2015.1040531
11.
DykemanB. F. (2011). Statistics anxiety: Antecedents and instructional interventions. Education, 132, 441–446.
GarfieldJ.Ben-ZviD. (2007). How students learn statistics revisited: A current review of research on teaching and learning statistics. International Statistical Review, 75, 372–396. doi:10.1111/j.1751-5823.2007.00029.x
14.
GarfieldJ.Ben-ZviD. (2009). Helping students develop statistical reasoning: Implementing a statistical reasoning learning environment. Teaching Statistics, 31, 72—77. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9639.2009.00363.x.
15.
GottfredsonL. S. (2003). Dissecting practical intelligence theory: Its claims and evidence. Intelligence, 31, 343–397. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(02)00085-2
16.
GrigorenkoE. L.JarvinL.SternbergR. J. (2002). School-based tests of the triarchic theory of intelligence: Three settings, three samples, three syllabi. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 167–208. doi:10.1006/ceps.2001.1087
17.
GrothR. E. (2014). Using the five practices model to promote statistical discourse. Teaching Statistics, 37, 13–17. doi:10.1111/test.12052
18.
HelmanS.HorswillM. S. (2002). Does the introduction of non-traditional teaching techniques improve psychology undergraduates’ performance in statistics?Psychology of Learning and Teaching, 2, 12–16.
19.
HimmelbergerK. S.SchwartzD. L. (2007). It’s a home run! Using mathematical discourse to support learning of statistics. Mathematics Teacher, 101, 250–256.
20.
HindlsR.HronováS. (2015). Are we able to pass the mission of statistics to students?Teaching Statistics, 37, 61–65. doi:10.1111/test.12076
21.
HolmesJ. D. (2014). Undergraduate psychology’s scientific identity dilemma: Student and instructor interests and attitudes. Teaching of Psychology, 41, 104–109. doi:0.1177/0098628314530339
22.
HolmesK. Y.DoddB. A. (2012). Teaching statistics using classic psychology research: An activities based approach. Teaching Statistics, 34, 13–17. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9639.2011.00499
23.
Howard-JonesP. A. (2014). Neuroscience and education: Myths and messages. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15, 817–823. doi:10.1038/nrn3817
24.
KarpickeJ. D.SmithM. A. (2012). Separate mnemonic effects of retrieval practice and elaborate encoding. Journal of Memory and Language, 67, 17–29. doi:10.1.1.721.9916
25.
KirschnerP. A. (2017). Stop propagating the learning styles myth. Computers & Education, 106, 166–171. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.006
26.
MarkantD. B.RuggertA.GureckisT. M.XuF. (2016). Enhance memory as a common effect of active learning. Mind, Brain, and Education, 10, 142–152. doi:10.1111/mbe.12117
27.
MarrsH.BarbM. R.RuggieroJ. C. (2007). Self-reported influences of psychology major choice and personality. Individual Differences Research, 5, 289–299.
28.
MarsonS. M. (2007). Three empirical strategies for teaching statistics. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 27, 199–213. doi:10.1300/J067v27n03_13
29.
McCrickerdJ. (2012). Understanding and reducing faculty reluctance to improve teaching. College Teaching, 60, 56–64. doi:10.1080/87567555.2011.633287
30.
McLarenH. J.KennyP. L. (2015). Motivating change from lecture-tutorial modes to less traditional forms of teaching. Australian Universities’ Review, 57, 26–33.
31.
MetznerB. S.RajeckiD. W.LauerJ. B. (1994). New majors and the feminization of psychology: Testing and extending the Rajecki-Metzner model. Teaching of Psychology, 21, 5–11. doi:10.1207/s15328023top2101_1
32.
National Survey of Student Engagement. (2017). Engagement Insights: Survey Findings on the Quality of Undergraduate Education—Annual Results 2017. Bloomington: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.
33.
NestojkoJ. F.BulD. C.KornellN.BjorkE. L. (2014). Expecting to teach enhances learning and organization of knowledge in free recall of text passages. Memory & Cognition, 42, 1038–1048. doi:10.3758/s13421-014-0146-z
PashlerH.McDanielM.RohrerD.BjorkR. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9, 105–119. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x
36.
PedhazurE. J.SchmelkinS. L. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
RajeckiD. W.ApplebyD.WilliamsC. C.JohnsonK.JeschkeM. P. (2005). Statistics can wait: Career plans activity and course preferences of American psychology undergraduates. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 4, 83–89. doi:10.2304/plat.2004.4.2.83
38.
RawsonK. A.VaughnK. E.CarpenterS. K. (2015). Does the benefit of testing depend on lag, and if so, why? Evaluation the elaborative retrieval hypothesis. Memory & Cognition, 43, 619–633. doi:10.3758/s13421-014-0477-z
39.
RenzulliJ. S.SullivanE. E. (2009). Learning styles applied: Harnessing students’ instructional style preferences. In SternbergR. J.ZhangL. (Eds.), Perspectives on the nature of learning styles (pp. 209–231). New York, NY: Springer.
40.
RoedigerH. L.PyeM. A. (2012). Inexpensive techniques to improve education: Applying cognitive psychology to enhance educational practice. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1, 242–248. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.09.002
41.
SmithA.Martinez-MoyanoI. (2012). Techniques in teaching statistics: Linking research production and research use. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 18, 107–136.
42.
SteinM. K.EngleR. A.SmithM. S.HughesE. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussion: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Reasoning, 10, 313–340. doi:10.1080/10986060802229675
43.
SternbergR. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
44.
SternbergR. J. (1986). A triarchic theory of intellectual giftedness. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 223–243). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University.
45.
SternbergR. J. (2003). Our research program validating the triarchic theory of successful intelligence: Reply to Gottfredson. Intelligence, 31, 399–413. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(02)00143-5
46.
SternbergR. J.GrigorenkoE. L. (2000). Teaching for successful intelligence: To increase student learning and achievement. Arlington Heights, IL: Skylight Professional Development.
47.
SternbergR. J.TorffB.GrigorenkoE. L. (1998). Teaching for successful intelligence raises school achievement. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 667–669.
48.
StoloffM. L.GoodM. R.SmithK. L.BrewsterJ. (2015). Characteristic of programs that maximize psychology major success. Teaching of Psychology, 42, 99–108. doi:10.1177/0098628315569877
49.
StowellJ. R.AddisonW. E. (2017). Activities for teaching statistics and research methods. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
50.
Vigil-ColetA.Lorenzo-SevaU.CondonL. (2008). Development and validation of the Statistical Anxiety Scale. Psicothema, 20, 174–180.
51.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52.
WilliamsA. S. (2010). Statistics anxiety and instructor immediacy. Journal of Statistics Education, 18, 1–18.
