This project describes the results from a large enrollment introductory psychology course specially designed to improve performance of first-year students. The main objective of the project was to identify early indicators of student success to inform future teaching and promote classroom engagement. Variables representing academic preparation, academic self-concept (e.g., growth mind-set), and behavioral indicators of academic engagement were analyzed with respect to course performance measures, including scores on the first test, midterm grades, and final grades. Academic preparation variables, growth mind-set scores, and some classroom behavior variables correlated with performance measures. Additionally, ACT scores and behavioral indicators of academic engagement were significant predictors of final grades. Findings are discussed in terms of strategies that teachers can use to promote student success in large enrollment, lecture-based courses such as introductory psychology.
AdelmanC. (2004). The empirical curriculum: Changes in postsecondary course-taking, 1972–2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
2.
AronsonJ.FriedC.GoodC. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 113–125. doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1491
3.
CohnE.CohnS.BalchD. C.BradleyJ. (2004). Determinants of undergraduate GPAs: SAT scores, high-school GPA and high-school rank. Economics of Education Review, 23, 577–586. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.01.001
4.
DweckC. S. (2007). The perils and promises of praise. Educational Leadership, 65, 34–39.
5.
DweckC. S. (2010a). Even geniuses work hard. Educational Leadership, 68, 16–20.
6.
DweckC. S. (2010b). Mind-sets. Principal Leadership, 10, 26–29.
7.
DweckC. S. (2012). Mindsets and human nature: Promoting change in the Middle East, the schoolyard, the racial divide, and willpower. American Psychologist, 67, 614–622.
8.
HoffmanJ. L.LowitzkiK. E. (2005). Predicting college success with high school grades and test scores: Limitations for minority students. The Review of Higher Education, 28, 455–474.
9.
KomarrajuM.RamseyA.RinellaV. (2013). Cognitive and non-cognitive predictors of college readiness and performance: Role of academic discipline. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 103–109. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.12.007
10.
KuhG. D.KinzieJ.BuckleyJ. A.BridgesB. K.HayekJ. C. (2006). What matters to student success: A review of the literature. Washington DC: National Postsecondary Education Cooperative.
11.
MichinovN.BrunotS.Le BohecO.JuhelJ.DelavalM. (2011). Procrastination, participation, and performance in online learning environments. Computers & Education, 56, 243–252. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.025
12.
MitchellK. (1997). Making the grade: Helping and hope for the first-generation college student. The ERIC Review, 5, 13–15.
13.
PlattC. W. (1988). Effects of causal attributions for success on first-term college performance: A covariance structure model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 560–578.
14.
RiehlR. (1994). The academic preparation, aspirations, and first-year performance of first-generation students. College and University, 70, 14–19.
15.
RobbinsS. B.LauverK.LeH.LangleyR.DavisD.CarlstromA. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 261–288.
16.
RobbinsS. B.OhI. S.LeH.ButtonC. (2009). Intervention effects on college performance and retention as mediated by academic-self conceptual, emotional, and social control factors: Integrated meta-analytic path analyses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1163–1184. doi:10.1037/a0015738
17.
SawyerR. (2013). Beyond correlations: Usefulness of high school GPA and test scores in making college admissions decisions. Applied Measurement in Education, 26, 89–112.
18.
SeligmanM. E. (2011). Learned optimism: How to change your mind and your life. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
19.
TangneyJ. P.BaumeisterR. F.BooneA. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271–324.
20.
ThayerP. B. (2000). Retention of students from first generation and low income backgrounds. Opportunity Outlook Journal, 3, 2–8.
21.
TintoV. (1988). Stages of student departure: Reflections on the longitudinal character of student leaving. The Journal of Higher Education, 59, 438–455.
22.
TymC.McMillionR.BaroneS.WebsterJ. (2004). First-generation college students: A literature review(Research and Analytic Services). Round Rock: Texas Guaranteed Student Loan Corporation.
23.
WestM. R.KraftM. A.FinnA. S.MartinR. E.DuckworthA. L.GabrieliC. F.GabrieliJ. D. (2015). Promise and paradox measuring students’ non-cognitive skills and the impact of schooling. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38, 148–170. doi:10.3102/0162373715597298
24.
YorkeM. (2004). Retention, persistence and success in on-campus higher education, and their enhancement in open and distance learning. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 19, 19–32.
