The American Psychological Association Board of Educational Affairs Working Group (APA) recommends providing some research experience to undergraduate students in the introductory psychology course. This nationwide survey of introductory psychology instructors explored the frequency of integrated research opportunities in introductory courses, types of research activities included in courses, instructors’ perceptions of the importance of providing research experience, and perceived barriers to integrating research. We found that although few of the introductory courses have a separate laboratory (5%), over 75% of the respondents indicated some manner of research activity in their courses. Most introductory courses included opportunities to read and critique original research, but few psychology programs at institutions of higher learning provided students with hands-on research, APA writing, or data presentation opportunities. Respondents also rated activities such as designing, conducting, and interpreting research as not especially important for introductory courses. Primary barriers to integrating research are logistical in nature.
American Psychological Association, APA Board of Educational Affairs Working Group on Strengthening the Common Core of the Introductory Psychology Course. (2013). Strengthening the common core of the introductory psychology course. Retrieved fromhttp://apa.org/ed/governance/bea/intro-psych-report.pdf
BertholdH. C.HakalaC. M.GoffD. (2003). An argument for a laboratory in introductory psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 30, 55–58.
5.
BrewerC. L.HopkinsJ. R.KimbleG. A.MatlinM. W.McCannL. L.McNeilO. V.,…Saundra. (1993). Curriculum. In McGovernT. V. (Ed.), Handbook for enhancing undergraduate education in psychology (pp. 161–182). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10126-006
6.
BrothenT. (1984). Three computer-assisted laboratory exercises for introductory psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 11, 105–107. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top1102_14
7.
BrownellJ. E.SwanerL. E. (2009). High-impact practices: Applying the learning outcomes literature to the development of successful campus programs. Peer Review, 11(2), 26–30.
8.
CacioppoJ. (2007). Psychology is a hub science. APS Observer, 20, 1–3.
Committee on Undergraduate Science Education, National Research Council. (1997). Science teaching reconsidered: A handbook. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
12.
CummingG.FinchS. (2005). Inference by eye: Confidence intervals, and how to read pictures of data. American Psychologist, 60, 170–180. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.2.170
13.
Dietz-UhlerB. (2009). Effectiveness of a web-based critical thinking module. In DunnD. S.HalonenJ. S.SmithR. A. (Eds.), Teaching critical thinking in psychology: A handbook of best practices (pp. 273–276). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
14.
DowneyC. A. (2013). Student research in an introductory psychology course: Outcomes of two experiential learning projects and implications for instruction of human subjects research. Journal of Effective Teaching, 13, 21–37.
15.
DrewJ. C.TriplettE. W. (2008). Whole genome sequencing in the undergraduate classroom: Outcomes and lessons from a pilot course. American Society for Microbiology, 9, 3–11.
HaakD. C.HilleRisLambersJ.PitreE.FreemanS. (2011). Increased structure and active learning reduce the achievement gap in introductory biology. Science, 332, 1213–1216. doi:10.1126/science.1204820
20.
HalpernD. F.ButlerH. A. (2011). Critical thinking and the education of psychologically literate citizens. In CranneyJ.DunnD. S. (Eds.), The psychologically literate citizen (pp. 27–40). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199794942.003.0020
21.
HolmesJ. D.BeinsB. C. (2009). Psychology is a science: At least some students think so. Teaching of Psychology, 36, 5–11. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00986280802529350
22.
HomaN.HackathornJ.BrownC.GarczynskiA.SolomonE.TennialR.GurungR. A. R. (2013). How consistent are introductory psychology course syllabi? Examining objectives and content. Teaching of Psychology, 40, 169–174. doi:10.1177/0098628313487456
23.
KazmerskiV. A.BlaskoD. G. (1999). Teaching observational research in introductory psychology: Computerized and lecture-based methods. Teaching of Psychology, 26, 295–298. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15328023TOP260409
24.
KenaG.AudS.JohnsonF.WangX.ZhangJ.RathbunA.Wilkinson-FlickerS.KristapovichP. (2014). The Condition of Education 2014 (NCES 2014-083). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved August, 2015 fromhttp://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch.
25.
KohnA.BrillM. (1981). An introductory demonstration laboratory produced entirely by undergraduates. Teaching of Psychology, 8, 133–138. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top0803_1
26.
KoschmannN.WespR. (2001). Using a dining facility as an introductory psychology research laboratory. Teaching of Psychology, 28, 105–108. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15328023TOP2802_07
LamsonN.KippK. (2009). A module-based research project: Modeling critical thinking in psychology. In DunnD. S.HalonenJ. S.SmithR. A. (Eds.), Teaching critical thinking in psychology: A handbook of best practices (pp. 247–250). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
29.
LilienfeldS. O. (2012). Public skepticism of psychology: Why many people perceive the study of human behavior as unscientific. American Psychologist, 67, 111–129. doi:10.1037/a0023963
30.
McBrideD. M.CuttingJ. C. (2015). Lab manual for psychological research. (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
MorlingB. (2014). Research methods in psychology: Evaluating a world of information (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Norton.
33.
NewcombA. F.BagwellC. L. (1997). Collaborative learning in an introduction to psychological science laboratory: Undergraduate teaching fellows teach to learn. Teaching of Psychology, 24, 88–95. doi:10.1207/2Fs15328023top2402_2
34.
NorcrossJ. C.HailstorksR.AikenL. S.PfundR. A.StammK. E.ChristidisP. (2016). Undergraduate study in psychology: Curriculum and assessment. American Psychologist, 71, 89. doi:10.1037/a0040095
35.
PennSchoen & Berland Associates. (2008). American Psychological Association benchmark study. New York, NY: Author.
36.
PetersonJ. J.AltmanW.Bouas HenryK.LeightonD. (2014, 8). Laboratory experiences for Introductory Psychology students: What works? In PetersonJ. J. (Chair). Symposium at American Psychological Association Annual Convention. Washington, DC.
ThiemanT. J.ClaryE. G.OlsonA. M.DaunerR. C.RingE. E. (2009). Introducing students to psychological research: General psychology as a laboratory course. Teaching of Psychology, 36, 160–168. doi:10.1080/00986280902959994
