The present study examined 12 abnormal psychology textbooks to determine whether Rosenhan’s classic study, “Being sane in insane places,” was covered, and if so, the nature of that coverage. Only 50% covered the study, with all describing the study as demonstrating the biasing power of psychiatric labels. Two key aspects of the study (the diagnoses of schizophrenia and their supposed subsequent influence on the hospital staff’s perception of the pseudopatients’ normal behavior as pathological) were commonly discussed. However, although the study has been heavily criticized, only two texts discussed any criticism of it. Teachers and text authors are urged to become more familiar with the critical literature on this study, and suggestions for class discussions of the study are provided.
BartelsJ. M.MilovichM. M.MoussierS. (2016). Coverage of the Stanford prison experiment in introductory psychology courses: A survey of introductory psychology instructors. Teaching of Psychology, 43, 136–141. doi:10.1177/0098628316636290
3.
*BeidelD. C.BulikC. M.StanleyM. A. (2014). Abnormal psychology (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
4.
*ComerR. J. (2015). Abnormal psychology (9th ed.). New York, NY: Worth.
5.
*DaveyG. (2014). Psychopathology: Research, assessment, and treatment in clinical psychology (2nd ed.). West Sussex, England: Wiley.
*DurandV. M.BarlowD. H. (2016). Essentials of abnormal psychology (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage.
8.
GorenfloD. W.McConnellJ. V. (1991). The most frequently cited journal articles and authors in introductory psychology textbooks. Teaching of Psychology, 18, 8–12.
9.
GriggsR. A.ChristopherA. N. (2016). Who’s who in introductory psychology textbooks: A citation analysis redux. Teaching of Psychology, 43, 109–119. doi:10.1177/0098628316636276
10.
GriggsR. A.JacksonS. L. (2007). Classic articles as primary source readings in introductory psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 34, 181–186. doi:10.1080/00986280701498582
11.
GriggsR. A.WhiteheadG. I.III. (2014). Coverage of the Stanford Prison Experiment in introductory social psychology textbooks. Teaching of Psychology, 41, 318–324. doi:10.1177/0098628314549703
12.
GriggsR. A.WhiteheadG. I.III. (2015a). Coverage of Milgram’s obedience experiments in social psychology textbooks: Where have all the criticisms gone?Teaching of Psychology, 42, 315–322. doi:10.1177/0098628314549703
13.
GriggsR. A.WhiteheadG. I.III. (2015b). Coverage of recent criticisms of Milgram’s obedience experiments in introductory social psychology textbooks. In BranniganA.CherryF.NicholsonI. (Eds.), Unplugging the Milgram machine [Special issue]. Theory and psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 564–580). doi:10.1177/0959354315601231
14.
*KearneyC. A.TrullT. J. (2015). Abnormal psychology and life: A dimensional approaches (2nd ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage.
LangerE. J.AbelsonR. P. (1974). A patient by any other name…: Clinician group difference in labeling bias. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 4–9.
17.
LilienfeldS. O.LynnS. J.RuscioJ.BeyersteinB. L. (2010). Great myths of popular psychology: Shattering widespread misconceptions about human behavior. West Sussex, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
18.
MillonT. (1975). Reflections on Rosenhan’s “On being sane in insane places.”Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 84, 456–461.
19.
*NevidJ. S.RathusS. A.GreeneB. (2014). Abnormal psychology in a changing world (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
20.
*Nolen-HoeksemaS. (2014). Abnormal psychology (6th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
21.
*OltmannsT. F.EmeryR. E. (2015). Abnormal psychology (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
22.
*RosenbergR. S.KosslynS. M. (2014). Abnormal psychology (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Worth.
23.
RosenhanD. L. (1973). On being sane in insane places. Science, 179, 250–258.
24.
RosenhanD. L. (1975). The contextual nature of psychiatric diagnosis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 84, 462–474.
25.
RuscioJ. (2004). Diagnosis and the behaviors they denote: A critical evaluation of the labeling theory of mental illness. The Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice, 3, 5–22.
26.
RuscioJ. (2015). Rosenhan pseudopatient study. In CautinR. L.LilienfeldS. O. (Eds.), The encyclopedia of clinical psychology (pp. 2496–2499). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
27.
SpitzerR. L. (1975). On pseudoscience in science, logic in remission, and psychiatric diagnosis: A critique of Rosenhan’s “On being sane in insane places.”Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 84, 442–452.
28.
SpitzerR. L. (1976). More on pseudoscience in science and the case for psychiatric diagnosis: A critique of D. L. Rosenhan’s “On being sane in insane places” and “The contextual nature of psychiatric diagnosis.”Archives of General Psychiatry, 33, 459–470.
29.
SpitzerR. L.LilienfeldS. O.MillerM. B. (2005). Rosenhan revisited: The scientific credibility of Lauren Slater’s pseudopatient diagnosis study. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 193, 734–739.
30.
TemerlinM. K. (1968). Suggestion effects in psychiatric diagnosis. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 147, 349–353.
31.
WeinerB. (1975). “On being sane in insane places”: A process (attributional) analysis and critique. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 84, 433–441.
32.
*WhitbourneS. K.HalginR. (2013). Abnormal psychology: Clinical perspectives on psychological disorders (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
33.
WolitzkyD. L. (1973). Insane versus feigned insane: A reply to Dr. D. L. Rosenhan. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 1, 463–473.
