Undergraduate research participant pools play an essential role in facilitating research, and many universities rely on them for participant recruitment. There is an abundance of information about those who do elect to participate in research through these recruitment systems but very little about those who do not. The present study examines both undergraduate research pool participants and nonparticipants, and the objective is to explore how they differ in their views. A sample of 483 Canadian undergraduate students (n = 442 participants and n = 41 nonparticipants) completed measures of their impressions of participation, their perceived enjoyment, and their knowledge gained from participating in research and asked to compare this with their impressions of attending class and taking exams. Factorial analysis of variance and χ2 results found support for both similarities and differences between both groups. Overall, the results suggest that nonparticipants do not have a good understanding of what is involved in participating in research activities and view it is a potentially aversive or negative experience.
American Psychological Association. (2002). American Psychological Association ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved fromhttp://www.apa.org/ethics/code2002.html
3.
BowmanL. L.WaiteB. M. (2003). Volunteering in research: Student satisfaction and educational benefits. Teaching of Psychology, 30, 102–106. doi:10.1207/S15328023TOP3002_03
4.
BrodyJ. L.CluckJ. P.AragonA. S. (1997). Participants’ understanding of the process of psychological research: Informed consent. Ethics & Behavior, 7, 285–298. doi:10.1207/s15327019eb0704_1
5.
CromerL.ReynoldsS.JohnsonM. (2013). Who says: “No Fair!”? What about personality and an experiment in educational value tell us about perceptions of costs and benefits of research pool participants. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13, 134–155.
6.
DarlingJ.GoedertK.CeynarM.ShoreW.AndersonD. (2007). Learning about the means to the end: What US introductory psychology students report about experimental participation. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 6, 91–97. doi:10.2304/plat.2007.6.2.91
7.
DaughertyT. K.LawrenceJ. W. (1996). Short-term effects of research participation on college men. Journal of Psychology, 130, 71–77. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1996.9914989
8.
ElickerJ. D.McConnellN. L.HallR. J. (2010). Research participation for course credit in introduction to psychology: Why don’t people participate?Teaching of Psychology, 37, 183–185.
9.
ElliottL.RiceS.TrafimowD.MadsonL.HipshurM. (2010). Research participation versus classroom lecture: A comparison of student learning. Teaching of Psychology, 37, 129–131. doi:10.1080/00986281003626862
10.
Gil-Gómez de LiañoBLeónO.Pascual-EzamaD. (2012). Research participation improves student’s exam performance. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15, 544–550. doi:10.5209/rev_SJOP.2012.v15.n2.38865
11.
KremerJ. F.BringleR. G. (1990). The effects of an intensive research experience on the careers of talented undergraduates. Journal of Research & Development in Education, 24, 1–5.
12.
LandrumR.ChastainG. (1995). Experiment spot-checks: A method for assessing the educational value of undergraduate participation in research. IRB, 17, 4–6.
13.
LandrumR. E.ChastainG. (1999). Subject pool policies in undergraduate-only departments: Results from a nationwide survey. In Protecting human subjects: Departmental subject pools and institutional review boards (pp. 25–42).
14.
LopattoD. (2007). Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning. Life Sciences Education, 6, 297–306. doi:10.1187/cbe.07-06-0039
15.
MillerW. E.KreinerD. S. (2008). Student perception of coercion to participate in psychological research. North American Journal of Psychology, 10, 53–64.
16.
MorelandR. L. (1999). Evaluationg students’ research….In CastainG.LandrumR. E. (Eds.), Protecting human subjects: Departmental subject pools and institutional review boards (pp. 87–108). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association Press.
17.
MoyerA.FranklinN. (2011). Strengthening the educational value of undergraduate participation in research as part of a psychology department subject pool. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: An International Journal, 6, 75–82. doi:10.1525/jer.2011.6.1.75
18.
Padilla-WalkerL.ThompsonR.ZamboangaB.SchmersalL. (2005). Extra credit as incentive for voluntary research participation. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 150–153. doi:10.1207/s15328023top3203_2
19.
RosellM.BeckD.LutherK.GoedertK.ShoreW.AndersonD. (2005). The pedagogical value of experimental participation paired with course content. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 95–99. doi:10.1207/s15328023top3202_3
20.
RussellS. H. (2008). Undergraduate research opportunities: Facilitating and encouraging the transition from student to scientist. In TarabanR.BlantonR. L. (Eds.), Creating effective undergraduate research programs in science (pp. 53–80). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
21.
ShadishW.CookT.CampbellD. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
22.
SharpE.PelletierL. G.LévesqueC. (2006). The double-edged sword of rewards for participation in psychology experiments. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 38, 269–277.
23.
SieberJ. E. (1999). What makes a subject pool (un)ethical?. In ChastainG.LandrumE. (Eds.), Protecting human subjects (pp. 43–64). Washington, D.C.: APA.
SullivanM.LashleyS. (2009). Developing informed research participants in an introductory psychology participant pool. Teaching of Psychology, 36, 24–28.
26.
TarabanR.LogueE. (2012). Academic factors that affect undergraduate research experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 449–514. doi:10.1037/a0026851
27.
ThiemanT. J.ClaryE. G.OlsonA. M.DaunerR. C.RingE. E. (2009). Introducing students to psychological research: General psychology as a laboratory course. Teaching of Psychology, 36, 160–168. doi:10.1080/00986280902959994
28.
TrafimowD.MadsonL.GwizdowskiL. (2006). Introductory psychology students’ perceptions of alternatives to research participation. Teaching of Psychology, 33, 247–249. doi:10.1207/s15328023top3304_7
29.
VanWormerL.JordanE.BlalockL. (2014). Assessing the perceived value of research participation. Teaching of Psychology, 41, 233–237. doi:10.1177/0098628314537974
30.
VittenglJ.BosleyC.BresciaS.EckardtE.NeidigJ.ShelverK.SapenoffL. (2004). Why are some undergraduates more (and others less) interested in psychological research?Teaching of Psychology, 31, 91–97.
31.
WintreM. G.NorthC.SugarL. A. (2001). Psychologists’ response to criticisms about research based on undergraduate participants: A developmental perspective. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 42, 216–225.
