Researchers have found that students from different academic disciplines tend to value different qualities in their teachers, and cultural differences play a role in which qualities students appreciate in their professors. The present/current study employed the Teacher Behavior Checklist as an operationalization of teaching qualities in a comparative investigation among psychology, chemical engineering, and education students in China. Chinese college students’ perceptions of excellent teachers’ qualities differed across the three disciplines. We offer some contextual and cultural explanations for the differences and conclude that student evaluations of instruction should always be interpreted within the context of the evaluation.
AleamoniL. M. (1981). Students’ ratings of instruction. In MillmanJ. (Ed.), Handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. 110–145). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
2.
BachenC. M.McLoughlinM. M.GarciaS. S. (1999). Assessing the role of gender in college students’ evaluations of faculty. Communication Education, 448, 193–210.
3.
BarnesD.EngellandB.MatherineC.MartinW.OrgeronC.RingJ.…WilliamsZ. (2008). Developing a psychometrically sound measure of collegiate teaching proficiency. College Student Journal, 42, 199–213.
4.
BasowS.DistenfeldM. S. (1985). Teacher expressiveness: More important for male teachers than female teachers?Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 45–52.
5.
BenassiV. A.OversonC. E.HakalaC. M. (2014). Applying science of learning in education: Infusing psychological science into the curriculum. Retrieved from the Society for the Teaching of Psychology web site: http://teachpsych.org/ebooks/asle2014/index.php
6.
BraskampL. A.BrandenbergD. C.OryJ. C. (1984). Evaluating teaching effectiveness: A practical guide. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
7.
BuskistW.SikorskiJ.BuckleyT.SavilleB. K. (2002). Elements of master teaching. In DavisS. F.BuskistW. (Eds.), The teaching of psychology: Essays in honor of Wilbert J. McKeachie and Charles L. Brewer (pp. 27–39). Mahwah, NJ: Lawerence Erlbaum.
8.
CarpenterB.TaitG. (2001). The rhetoric and reality of good teaching: A case study across three faculties at the Queensland University of Technology. Higher Education, 42, 191–203.
9.
CashinW. E. (1990). Students do rate different academic fields differently. In TheallM.FranklinJ. (Eds.), Student ratings of instruction: Issues for improving practice. New directions for teaching and learning (Vol. 43, pp. 113–121). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
10.
ChenG.WatkinsD. (2010). Stability and correlates of student evaluations of teaching at a Chinese University. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 675–685.
FeldmanK. A. (1984). Class size and students’ evaluation of college teachers and courses: A closer look. Research in Higher Education, 21, 45–116.
13.
FeldmanK. A. (1978). Course characteristics and college students’ ratings of their teachers and courses: What we know and what we don’t. Research in Higher Education, 9, 199–242.
14.
GhedinE.AquarioD. (2008). Moving towards multidimensional evaluation of teaching in higher education: A study across four faculties. High Education, 56, 583–597.
15.
GravestockP.GreenleafE. (2008). Student course evaluations: Research, models and trends. Toronto, Canada: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario.
16.
HakalaJ.YlijokiO. H. (2001). Research for whom? Research orientations in three academic cultures. Organization, 8, 373–380.
17.
KekaleJ. (2000). Quality assessment in diverse disciplinary settings. Higher Education, 40, 465–488.
18.
KeeleyJ.ChristopherA. N.BuskistW. (2012). Emerging evidence for excellent teaching across borders. In GrocciaJ. E.AlsudairiM. A. T.BuskistW.. (Eds.), Handbook of college and university teaching: A global perspective (pp. 374–390). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
KeeleyJ.SmithD.BuskistW. (2006). The teacher behaviors checklist: Factor analysis of its utility for evaluating teaching. Teaching of Psychology, 33, 84–91.
20.
KiddR.LatifD. (2004). Student evaluations: Are they valid measures of course effectiveness?American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 68, 1–5.
21.
KwanK. (1999). How fair are student ratings in assessing the teaching performance of university teachers?Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 24, 181–194.
22.
LiawS. H.GohK. L. (2003). Evidence and control of biases in student evaluations of teaching. International Journal of Educational Management, 17, 37–43.
23.
LiuS.KeeleyJ.BuskistW. (2015). Chinese college students’ perceptions of characteristics of excellent teachers. Teaching of Psychology, 42, 83–86.
24.
LowmanJ. (1995). Mastering the techniques of teaching (2nd ed.). San Franciso, CA: Jossey-Bass.
25.
MarshH. W.OverallJ. U.KeslerS.P. (1979). Class size, students’ evaluation, and instructional effectiveness. American Educational Research Journal, 16, 57–70.
26.
MeyersL. S.GamstG.GuarinoA. J. (2006). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.WitcherA. E.CollinsK. M. T.FilerJ. D.WiedmaierC. D.MooreC. W. (2007). Students’ perceptions of characteristics of effective college teachers: A validity study of a teaching evaluation form using a mixed-methods analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 113–160.
28.
ParpalaA. S.RytkönenH. (2011). Students’ conceptions of good teaching in three different disciplines. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36, 549–563.
29.
ParpalaA., S.KomulainenE.LitmanenT.HirstoL. (2010). Students’ approaches to learning and their experiences of the teaching-learning environment in different disciplines. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 60, 269–282.
30.
RevellA.WainwrightE. (2009). What makes lectures ‘unmissable’? Insights into excellent teaching and active learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33, 209–233.
