Psychology-specific epistemological beliefs (EBs) are believed to influence students’ approach to and performance in psychology courses. However, empirical research on this topic is limited due in part to a lack of well-validated instruments measuring this construct. The primary objective of this research was to develop and validate the Psychology-Specific Epistemological Belief Scale (Psych-SEBS), a short self-report instrument measuring psychology-specific EBs. Study 1 addresses the structural validity, internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and convergent validity of the Psych-SEBS. Study 2 addresses the criterion-related and incremental validity of the Psych-SEBS. Findings indicated acceptable psychometric properties of this 13-item instrument and its three subscales, namely, significance of psychology research, subjective nature of psychology knowledge, and predictability of human behavior. Scores on Psych-SEBS scales were significantly associated with construct-relevant outcomes, including student interest and performance in psychology courses, and explained unique variance in these outcomes beyond that explained by existing instruments.
AlexanderP. A.SchallertD. L.HareV. C. (1991). Coming to terms: How researchers in learning and literacy talk about knowledge. Review of Educational Research, 61, 315–343. doi:10.2307/1170635
2.
BuehlM. M.AlexanderP. A. (2001). Beliefs about academic knowledge. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 385–418. doi:10.1023/A:1011917914756
3.
BuehlM. M.AlexanderP. A.MurphyP. K. (2002). Beliefs about schooled knowledge: Domain specific or domain general?Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 415–449. doi:10.1006/ceps.2001.1103
ElbyA.FrederiksenJ.SchwarzC.WhiteB. (2001). The epistemological beliefs assessment for physical science. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
6.
EstesD.ChandlerM.HorvathK. J.BackusD. W. (2003). American and British college students’ epistemological beliefs about research on psychological and biological development. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 23, 625–642. doi:10.1016/S0193-3973(03)00002-9
7.
FavaJ. L.VelicerW. F. (1992). The effects of overextraction on factor and component analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27, 387–415. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2703_1
8.
FrancoG. M.MuisK. R.KendeouP.RanelluciJ.SampasivamL. (2012). Examining the influences of epistemic beliefs and knowledge representations on cognitive processing and conceptual change when learning physics. Learning and Instruction, 22, 62–77. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.06.003
9.
FriedrichJ. (1996). Assessing students’ perceptions of psychology as a science: Validation of a self-report measure. Teaching of Psychology, 23, 6–13. doi:10.1207/s15328023top2301_1
10.
GervasioA.WendorfC. A.YoderN. F. (2010). Validating a psychology as a helping profession scale. Teaching of Psychology, 37, 107–113. doi:10.1080/00986281003609199
11.
HoferB. (2006). Beliefs about knowledge and knowing: Integrating domain specificity and domain generality. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 67–76. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9000-9
12.
HolmesJ. D.BeinsB. C. (2009). Psychology is a science: At least some students think so. Teaching of Psychology, 36, 5–11. doi:10.1080/00986280802529350
13.
HunsleyJ.MeyerG. J. (2003). The incremental validity of psychological testing and assessment: Conceptual, methodological, and statistical issues. Psychological Assessment, 15, 446–455. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.15.4.446
14.
KuhnD. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
15.
KuhnD.CheneyR.WeinstockM. (2000). The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15, 309–328. doi:10.1016/S0885-2014(00)00030-7
16.
LilienfeldS. O.LynnS.RuscioJ.BeyersteinB. L. (2010). 50 great myths of popular psychology: Shattering widespread misconceptions about human behavior. West Sussex, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
17.
LiuS. Y.LinC. S.TsaiC. C. (2011). College students’ scientific epistemological views and thinking patterns in socioscientific decision making. Science Education, 95, 497–517. doi:10.1002/sce.20422
18.
LiuS. Y.TsaiC. C. (2008). Differences in the scientific epistemological views of undergraduate students. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1055–1073.
19.
LodewykK. R. (2007). Relations among epistemological beliefs, academic achievement, and task performance in secondary school students. Educational Psychology, 27, 307–327. doi:10.1080/01443410601104080
20.
LyddyF.HughesS. (2011). Attitudes towards psychology as a science and the persistence of psychological misconceptions in psychology undergraduates. In KarandashevV.McCarthyS. (Eds.), Teaching psychology around the world (Vol. 3, pp. 330–349). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
21.
MartinG. N.SadlerS. J.BaluchB. (1997). Individual group differences in the perception and knowledge of psychological research. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 771–774. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(96)00256-5
22.
ProvostS.HeritageF.PeacockA.LippO. V.BathD.HannanG. (2011). University students views on the nature of science and psychology. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 10, 128–145. doi:10.2304/plat.2011.10.2.128
23.
ReiseS. P.WallerN. G.ComreyA. L. (2000). Factor analysis and scale revision. Psychological Assessment, 12, 287–297. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.12.3.287
24.
RyanM. P. (1984). Monitoring text comprehension: Individual differences in epistemological standards. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 248–258. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.76.2.248
25.
SchommerM. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 498–504. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.498
26.
SchommerM. (1993). Epistemological development and academic performance among secondary students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 406–411. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.406
27.
SchommerM.CrouseA.RhodesN. (1992). Epistemological beliefs and mathematical text comprehension: Believing it is simple does not make it so. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 435–443. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.435
28.
SimontonD. K. (2009). Applying the psychology of science to the science of psychology: Can psychologists use psychological science to enhance psychology as a science?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 2–4. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01093.x
29.
StathopoulouC.VosniadouS. (2007). Conceptual change in physics and physics-related epistemological beliefs: A relationship under scrutiny. In VosniadouS.BaltasA.VamvakoussiX. (Eds.), Reframing the conceptual change approach in learning and instruction (pp. 145–163). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
30.
SteigerJ. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245–251. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.87.2.245
31.
TsaiC. C.LiuS. Y. (2005). Developing a multi-dimensional instrument for assessing students’ epistemological views toward science. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 1621–1638.
32.
WoodJ. M.TatarynD. J.GorsuchR. L. (1996). Effects of under- and overextraction on principle axis factor analysis with varimax rotation. Psychological Methods, 1, 354–365. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.4.354
