Jigsaw classroom research has primarily explored racial relationships at the primary and secondary educational levels. The present study explored whether the jigsaw classroom would have an effect on students’ attitudes about their own academic abilities and practices at the university level. The present study also sought to illuminate the necessary time course for the technique. Three sections of students in a cognitive psychology course participated. One section received a full jigsaw exposure, one received a reduced jigsaw exposure, and one received no jigsaw exposure. Posttests reveal that students given the full jigsaw exposure report an increased ability to teach psychological concepts to other students compared to the control condition. Moreover, there is evidence that the jigsaw technique increases the students’ ability to communicate orally and their belief in themselves as scholars.
AntilL. R.JenkinsJ. R.WayneS. K.VadasyP. F. (1998). Cooperative learning: Prevalence, conceptualizations, and the relation between research and practice. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 419–454. doi:10.2307/1163443
2.
AronsonE. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA. Sage.
3.
AronsonE.PatnoeS. (2011). Cooperation in the classroom: The jigsaw method. London, England: Pinter & Martin Ltd.
4.
BergerR.HänzeM. (2009). Comparison of two small-group learning methods in 12th-grade physics classes focusing on intrinsic motivation and academic performance. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 1511–1527. doi:10.1080/09500690802116289
5.
BlaneyN.StephanC.RosenfieldD.AronsonE.SikesJ. (1977). Interdependence in the classroom: A field study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 121–128.
6.
BongM.ChoC.AhnH. S.KimH. J. (2012). Comparison of self-beliefs for predicting student motivation and achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 105, 336–352.
7.
BrattC. (2008). The jigsaw classroom under the test: No effect on intergroup relations evident. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 18, 403–419. doi:10.1002/casp.946
8.
BridgemanD. L. (1981). Enhanced role taking through cooperative interdependence: A field study. Child Development, 52, 1231–1238. doi:10.2307/1129511
9.
CarrollD. W. (1986). Use of the jigsaw technique in laboratory and discussion classes. Teaching of Psychology, 13, 208–210. doi:10.1207/s15328023top1304_9
10.
CookS. W. (1985). The case of school desegregation. American Psychologist, 40, 452–460.
11.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
12.
EilksI. (2005). Experiences and reflections about teaching atomic structure in a jigsaw classroom in lower secondary school chemistry lessons. Journal of Chemical Education, 82, 313–319.
13.
GalyonC. E.BlondinC. A.YawJ. S.NallsM. L.WilliamsR. L. (2012). The relationship of academic self-efficacy to class participation and exam performance. Social Pscyhology of Education, 15, 233–249.
14.
GhaithG.El-MalakM. A. (2004). Effect of Jigsaw II on literal and higher order EFL reading comprehension. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10, 105–115.
15.
HidiS.WeissJ.BerndorffD.NolanJ. (1998). The role of gender, instruction, and a cooperative learning technique in science education across formal and informal settings. In HoffmannL.KrappA.RenningerK. A.BaumertJ. (Eds.), Interest and learning (pp. 215–227). Kiel, Germany: IPN.
16.
MillisB. J.CottellP. G. (1998). Cooperative learning for higher education faculty. Phoenix: Oryx Press.
17.
PerkinsD. V.SarisR. N. (2001). A “jigsaw classroom” technique for undergraduate statistics course. Teaching of Psychology, 28, 111–113. doi:10.1207/S15328023TOP2802_09
18.
PerkinsD. V.TaglerM. (2011). Jigsaw classroom. In MillerR.RycekB. (Eds.), Promoting student engagement, Volume I: Programs, techniques, and Opportunities (pp. 195–197). Syracuse, NY: Society for the Teaching of Psychology. Retrieved fromhttp://teachpsych.org/resources/e-books/pse2011/vol1/39.%20Jigsaw.pdf
19.
SlavinR. E. (1980). Cooperative learning in teams: State of the art. Educational Psychologist, 15, 93–111.
20.
SlavinR. E.CooperR. (1999). Improving intergroup relations: Lessons learned from cooperative learning programs. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 647–663. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00140
21.
WalkerI.CroganM. (1998). Academic performance, prejudice, and the jigsaw classroom: New pieces to the puzzle. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 8, 381–393.
22.
WilliamsD. (2004). Improving race relations in higher education: The jigsaw classroom as a missing piece to the puzzle. Urban Education, 39, 316–344. doi:10.1177/0042085904263063
23.
ZachariaZ. C.XenofontosN. A.ManoliC. C. (2011). The effect of two different cooperative approaches on students’ learning and practices within the context of a WebQuest science investigation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59, 399–424. doi:10.1007/s11423-010-9181-2
