Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

We investigated Montepare’s (2005, 2007) self-correcting procedure for multiple-choice exams. Findings related to memory suggest this procedure should lead to improved retention by encouraging students to distribute the time spent reviewing the material. Results from a general psychology class (n = 98) indicate that the benefits are not as definitive as expected. Students’ initial performance moderated the benefits of the procedure such that comprehensive final exam scores were significantly higher for the self-correcting condition when controlling for initial quiz performance, with a marginally significant interaction (p = .06) between initial quiz scores and condition. The findings underscore the importance of using the scientist-educator model to evaluate pedagogical decisions while considering practical implications and return on investment.

Keywords

formative assessment memory scientist-educator model

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aiken

L. S.

West

S. G.

(1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Dempster

F. N.

(1988). The spacing effect: A case study in the failure to apply the results of psychological research. American Psychologist, 43, 627–634.

DiBattista

Mitterer

J. O.

Gosse

(2004). Acceptance by undergraduates of the Immediate Feedback Assessment Technique for multiple-choice testing. Teaching in Higher Education, 9, 17–28.

Epstein

M. L.

Lazarus

A. D.

Calvano

T. B.

Matthews

K. A.

Hendel

R. A.

Epstein

B. B.

Brosvic

G. M.

(2002). Immediate Feedback Assessment Technique promotes learning and corrects inaccurate first responses. Psychological Record, 52, 187–201.

Huxtable-Jester

. (2007, November 5). Strategies for self-correcting exams? [Electronic mailing list message]. Retrieved February 23, 2008, https://listkennesaw.edu/listserv/wa?A2=PSYCHTEACHER;b2a866f5.0711

Karpicke

J. D.

Roediger

H. L.

III (2007). Repeated retrieval during learning is the key to long-term retention. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 151–162.

Montepare

J. M

. (2005, October). A self-correcting approach to multiple-choice tests. APS Observer, 18 (10), 35–36, 43–44. Retrieved October 22, 2007, from http://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/getArticle.cfm?id=1867

Montepare

J. M.

(2007). A self-correcting approach to multiple-choice tests. In Perlman

McCann

L. I.

McFadden

S. H.

(Eds.), Lessons learned (Vol. 3, pp. 143–154). Washington, DC: Association for Psychological Science.

Smith

T. A.

Kimball

D. R.

(2010). Learning from feedback: Spacing and the delay-retention effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Language, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 80–95.

10.

Son

L. K.

(2010). Metacognitive control and the spacing effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 255–262.

11.

Stupans

(2006). Multiple choice questions: Can they examine application of knowledge? Pharmacy Education, 6, 59–63.

The Effect and Implications of a “Self-Correcting” Assessment Procedure

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References