A Multi-Modal Active Learning Experience for Teaching Social Categorization

Abstract

This article details a multi-modal active learning experience to help students understand elements of social categorization. Each student in a group dynamics course observed two groups in conflict and identified examples of in-group bias, double-standard thinking, out-group homogeneity bias, law of small numbers, group attribution error, ultimate attribution error, and moral exclusion. Students individually wrote papers detailing their observations. The author then carefully structured students' small and large group discussions so students could present and compare their findings orally. Pretest–posttest analyses revealed that students had a more complete and accurate understanding of social categorization after participating in this assignment than they did after merely reading the relevant textbook chapter.

Keywords

active learning multi-modal learning group dynamics social psychology social categorization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bonwell

C. C.

Eison

J. A.

(1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Rep. No. 1). Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.

Christopher

A. N.

Walter

J. L.

Marek

Koenig

C. S.

(2004). Using a “new classic” film to teach about stereotyping and prejudice. Teaching of Psychology, 31, 199–202.

Forrest

K. D.

(2005). Experiential learning in the introductory class: The role of minor league hockey in teaching social psychology. College Student Journal, 39, 794–797.

Forsyth

D. R.

(2006). Group dynamics (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thompson-Wadsworth.

Isbell

L. M.

Tyler

J. M.

(2003). Teaching students about in-group favoritism and the minimal groups paradigm. Teaching of Psychology, 30, 127–130.

Junn

E. N.

Grier

L. K.

Behrens

D. P.

(2001). Playing “Sherlock Holmes”: Enhancing students' understanding of prejudice and stereotyping. Teaching of Psychology, 28, 121–124.

Khan

S. R.

(1999). Teaching an undergraduate course on the psychology of racism. Teaching of Psychology, 26, 28–33.

Kress

Jewitt

Ogborn

Tsatsarelis

(2001). Multimodal teaching and learning: The rhetorics of the science classroom. London: Continuum.

Lakin

J. L.

Wichman

A. L.

(2005). Applying social psychological concepts outside the classroom. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 110–113.

10.

Mayer

R. E.

(2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59, 14–19. doi:10.1037/0003–066X.59.1.14

11.

Nilson

L. B.

(2003). Teaching at its best (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

12.

Sivan

Leung

R. W.

Woon

Kember

(2000). An implementation of active learning and its effect on the quality of student learning. Innovations in Education and Training International, 37, 381–389.

13.

Svinicki

M. D.

(2004). Learning and motivation in the postsecondary classroom. Bolton, MA: Anker Press.

14.

Yoder

J. D.

Hochevar

C. M.

(2005). Encouraging active learning can improve students' performance on examinations. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 91–95.