Abstract
Heavily influenced by Western scientism, the economics profession strives to emulate classical physics in its search for universal laws that govern the complex world. However, the indeterminacy of the economic world means that economics cannot replicate classical physics, leaving mainstream economics perpetually entangled in a paradoxical relationship between theoretical assumptions and empirical realities, as it continually seeks universalization. In contrast, the social science of practice approach does not use assumption-driven frameworks to construct universal laws. Instead, it abstracts the real logic of actors’ behavior from practice, understood as the dualistic interaction between subjective and objective elements. This approach not only constitutes a powerful critique of formalist epistemology but also offers important insights into how to build a social science grounded in Chinese subjectivity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
