The surge in cesarean section (CS) deliveries in China over the past several decades has led to significant international discussion, yet critical social science inquiry remains limited. Drawing on insights from sociological and anthropological studies of childbirth, this article moves away from the premise that having a CS is a matter of individual choice. Instead, we treat childbirth as ground zero of a set of complex negotiations between multiple actors, and we show how the biopolitical and politico-economic reconfiguration of the process of childbirth governance from the 1990s onwards has contributed to a dramatic increase in cesarean deliveries. Combining ethnographic materials from China’s rural and urban areas with an analysis of documents and quantitative data, we argue that the surge in CS rates in post-1990s China is part of a larger globalized process of the technocratic medicalization of birth, which has had a profound impact on the normative procedures and conditions shaping the process of childbirth, including the methods and forms of knowledge guiding childbirth management. This has contributed to the increasing normalization of a highly medicalized and interventionist model of childbirth, which has in turn facilitated the routinization of cesarean procedures.
BaerHans (2001) Biomedicine and Alternative Healing Systems in America: Issues of Class, Race, Ethnicity, and Gender. Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press.
2.
AndrewBarryOsborneThomasRoseNikolas [eds.] (1996) Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-liberalism, and Rationalities of Government. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press.
3.
BetranAna P.TorloniM. R.ZhangJ. J.GülmezogluA. M., and WHO Working Group on Caesarean Section (2016b) “WHO statement on caesarean section rates.” BJOG: An International J. of Obstetrics & Gynaecology123, 5: 667–70.
4.
BetranAna P.YeJianfengMollerAnne-BethZhangJun (2016a) “The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990–2014.” PLoS One11, 2: e0148343.
5.
BetranAna P.YeJianfengMollerAnne-BethSouzaJoão PauloZhangJun (2021) “Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates.” BMJ Global Health6, 6: e005671.
6.
WiebeBijkerHughesThomas P.PinchTrevor [eds.] (1987) The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
BoggLennartHuangKunLongQianShenYuanHemminkiElina (2010) “Dramatic increase of cesarean deliveries in the midst of health reforms in rural China.” Social Science & Medicine70, 10: 1544–49.
8.
BorstCharlotte (1995) Catching Babies: The Professionalization of Childbirth, 1870–1920. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
9.
CaiW.MarksJ. S.ChenC. H.ZhuangY. X.MorrisL.HarrisJ. (1998) “Increased cesarean section rates and emerging patterns of health insurance in Shanghai, China.” American J. of Public Health88, 5: 777–80.
10.
CaiYongWangFeng (2014) “(Re)emergence of late marriage in Shanghai: from collective synchronization to individual choice.” Pp. 97–117 in DavisDeborahFriedmanSara (eds.), Wives, Husbands, and Lovers: Marriage and Sexuality in Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Urban China. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.
11.
CampbellRonaPorterSam (1997) “Feminist theory and the sociology of childbirth: a response to Ellen Annandale and Judith Clark.” Sociology of Health & Illness19, 3: 348–58.
12.
ChanCheris S.YaoZelin (2018) “A market of distrust: toward a cultural sociology of unofficial exchanges between patients and doctors in China.” Theory and Society47, 6: 737–72.
13.
CheungNgai Fen (2009) “Chinese midwifery: the history and modernity.” Midwifery25, 3: 228–41.
14.
China Population and Development Research Center 中国人口与发展研究中心 (2016) 中国卫生和计划生育年鉴 (2016) (China health and family planning yearbook 2016). Beijing: Zhongguo weisheng jiankang nianjianshe.
15.
ClarkeAdeleShimJanet K.MamoLauraFosketJenniferFishmanJennifer (2003) “Biomedicalization: technoscientific transformations of health, illness, and U.S. biomedicine.” American Sociological Rev. 68, 2: 161–94.
16.
CongYali (2004) “Doctor–family–patient relationship: the Chinese paradigm of informed consent.” J. of Medicine & Philosophy29, 2: 149–78.
17.
CosminskySheila (2016) Midwives and Mothers: The Medicalization of Childbirth on a Guatemalan Plantation. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press.
18.
CrollElisabeth (1978) Feminism and Socialism in China. London: Routledge & Keegan Paul.
19.
Davis-FloydRobbie (1992) Birth as an American Rite of Passage. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
20.
Davis-FloydRobbie (1994) “The technocratic body: American childbirth as cultural expression.” Social Science & Medicine38, 8: 1125–40.
21.
Davis-FloydRobbie (2017) Ways of Knowing about Birth: Mothers, Midwives, Medicine, and Birth Activism. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
22.
RobbieDavis-FloydCheneyMelissa [eds.] (2019) Birth in Eight Cultures: Brazil, Greece, Japan, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Tanzania, and the United States. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
23.
RobbieDavis-FloydSargentCarolyn F. [eds.] (1997) Childbirth and Authoritative Knowledge: Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
24.
ElmanBenjamin A. (2006) A Cultural History of Modern Science in China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
25.
FangXiaoping (2017) “Bamboo steamers and red flags: building discipline and collegiality among China’s traditional rural midwives in the 1950s.” China Q. 230: 420–43.
26.
FengXing LinXuLingGuoYanRonsmansCarine (2011) “Socioeconomic inequalities in hospital births in China between 1988 and 2008.” Bulletin of the World Health Organization89, 6: 432–41.
27.
FordAndrea (2020) “Birthing from within: nature, technology, and self-making in Silicon Valley childbearing.” Cultural Anthropology35, 4: 602–30.
28.
FoucaultMichel (2007) Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–78. Translated by Graham Burchell. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
29.
FuDawei 傅大为 (2008) “为什么台湾的剖腹产率居高不下?” (Why is the cesarean rate so high in Taiwan?). Pp. 324–32 in 成令方Cheng Lingfang傅大为Fu Dawei林宜平Lin Yiping (eds.), 医疗与社会共舞 (When medicine dances with society). Taipei: Qunxue.
30.
FurthCharlotte (1987) “Concepts of pregnancy, childbirth, and infancy in Ch’ing dynasty China.” J. of Asian Studies46, 1: 7–35.
31.
FurthCharlotte (1994) “Rethinking Van Gulik: sexuality and reproduction in traditional Chinese medicine.” Pp. 125–46 in GilmartinChristina K.HershatterGailRofelLisaWhiteTyrene (eds.), Engendering China: Women, Culture, and the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
32.
GinsburgFayeRappRayna (1991) “The politics of reproduction.” Annual Rev. of Anthropology20: 311–43.
33.
GoldsteinJoshua (1998) “Scissors, surveys, and psycho-prophylactics: prenatal health care campaigns and state building in China, 1949–1954.” J. of Historical Sociology11, 2: 153–84.
34.
GottschangSuzanne (2018) Formulas for Motherhood in a Chinese Hospital. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.
35.
GottschangSuzanne (2020) “Reproductive modernities in policy: maternal mortality, midwives, and cesarean sections in China, 1900s–2000s.” Technology and Culture61, 2: 617–44.
GreenhalghSusan (1994) “Controlling births and bodies in village China.” American Ethnologist 21, 1: 3–30.
38.
GreenhalghSusan (2005) “Missile science, population science: the origins of China’s one-child policy.” China Q. 182: 253–76.
39.
GreenhalghSusan (2008) Just One Child: Science and Policy in Deng’s China. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California Press.
40.
GreenhalghSusanWincklerEdwin A. (2005) Governing China’s Population: From Leninist to Neoliberal Biopolitics. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.
41.
SusanGreenhalghZhangLi [eds.] (2019) Can Science and Technology Save China?Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.
42.
GuoSufangPadmadasSabu S.ZhaoFengminBrownJames J.StonesR. William (2007) “Delivery settings and caesarean section rates in China.” Bulletin of the World Health Organization85, 10: 755–62.
43.
HeJingwei AlexQianJiwei (2013) “Hospitals’ responses to administrative cost-containment policy in urban China: the case of Fujian province.” China Q. 216: 946–69.
44.
HeZhifeiChengZhaohuiWuTailaiZhouYanChenJunguoFuQianFengZhanchun (2016) “The costs and their determinant of cesarean section and vaginal delivery: an exploratory study in Chongqing municipality, China.” BioMed Research International. doi:10.1155/2016/5685261.
45.
HellersteinSusanFeldmanSarahDuanTao (2016) “Survey of obstetric care and cesarean delivery rates in Shanghai, China.” Birth43, 3: 193–99.
46.
HellersteinSusanHouCelia LeiZhangCelia Weiyuan (2015) “Cesarean delivery in China: analysis of cesarean deliveries without indication.” Obstetrics & Gynecology125, S1: S20.
47.
HershatterGail (2011) The Gender of Memory: Rural Women and China’s Collective Past. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
JohnsonTinaWuYi-Li (2014) “Maternal and child health in nineteenth- to twenty-first-century China.” Pp. 51–68 in AndrewsBridieBullockMary Brown (eds.), Medical Transitions in Twentieth-Century China. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.
50.
JordanBrigitte (1978) Birth in Four Cultures: A Crosscultural Investigation of Childbirth in Yucatan, Holland, Sweden, and the United States. Montreal: Eden Press Women’s Publications.
51.
KingdonC.NeilsonJ.SingletonV.GyteG.HartA.GabbayM.LavenderT. (2009) “Choice and birth method: mixed-method study of caesarean delivery for maternal request.” BJOG: An International J. of Obstetrics & Gynaecology116, 7: 886–95.
52.
KipnisAndrew (2006) “Suzhi: a keyword approach.” China Q. 186: 295–313.
53.
KuanChen-I (2016) “Technocratic culture and the moral regime of childbirth in Taiwan.” Annual Meeting of the Society for the History of Technology, Singapore, June22–26.
54.
LeavittJudith W. (2016 [1986]) Brought to Bed: Childbearing in America, 1750 to 1950. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
55.
LeeJen-Der (2005) “Childbirth in early imperial China.” Nan Nü7, 2: 216–86.
56.
LiHongtianLuoShushengTrasandeLeonardoHellersteinSusanKangChuyunLiJia-XinZhangYali, et al. (2017) Geographic variations and temporal trends in cesarean delivery rates in China, 2008-–2014.” J. of the American Medical Association317, 1: 69–76.
57.
LiYanfang [李艳芳] (2008) “Non-medical factors of cesarean section in a Guangzhou hospital: a case-control study.” Master’s thesis, Hong Kong College of Medicine, Univ. of Hong Kong.
58.
LiuX.LynchC. D.ChengW. W.LandonM. B. (2016) “Lowering the high rate of caesarean delivery in China: an experience from Shanghai.” BJOG: An International J. of Obstetrics & Gynaecology123, 10: 1620–28.
59.
LiuYajunLiGuanghuiChenYiWangXinRuanYanZouLiyingZhangWeiyuan (2014) “A descriptive analysis of the indications for caesarean section in mainland China.” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 14, 1: 410.
60.
LockMargaret (2004) “Medicalization and the naturalization of social control.” Pp. 116–25 in EmberCarol R.EmberMelvin (eds.), Encyclopedia of Medical Anthropology: Health and Illness in the World’s Cultures. Boston, MA: Springer US.
61.
LongQ.KingdonC.YangF.RenecleF., M. D.JahanfarS.BohrenM. A.BetranA. P. (2018) “Prevalence of and reasons for women’s, family members’, and health professionals’ preferences for cesarean section in China: a mixed-methods systematic review.” PLoS Medicine15, 10: e1002672.
62.
LucasAnelissa (1982) Chinese Medical Modernization: Comparative Policy Continuities, 1930–1980s. New York: Praeger.
63.
LumbiganonPisakeLaopaiboonMalineeGülmezogluA. MetinSouzaJoão PauloTaneepanichskulSurasakPangRuyanAttygalleDeepika, et al. (2010) Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007–08. Lancet375, 9713: 490–99.
64.
MartinEmily (1987) The Woman in The Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
65.
MccourtChristine (2009) Childbirth, Midwifery and Concepts of Time. New York: Berghahn Books.
66.
MengQunXuLingZhangYaoguangQianJunchengCaiMinXinYingGaoJun, et al. (2012) “Trends in access to health services and financial protection in China between 2003 and 2011: a cross-sectional study.” Lancet379, 9818: 805–14.
67.
MiJieLiuFangchao (2014) “Rate of caesarean section is alarming in China.” Lancet383, 9927: 1463–64.
68.
MillerSuellenAbalosEdgardoChamillardMonicaCiapponiAgustinColaciDanielaComandéDanielDiazVirginia, et al. (2016) “Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide.” Lancet388, 10056: 2176–92. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31472-6.
Ministry of Health 卫生部 and Ministry of Finance 财政部 (2009) “关于印发《关于进一步加强农村孕产妇住院分娩工作的指导意见》的通知” (Notice on the issuance of the “Guidelines for Work on Promoting Hospital Birth among Rural Pregnant Women”). Jan. 20. https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2009/content_1365916.htm.
72.
OakleyAnn (1980) Women Confined: Towards a Sociology of Childbirth. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
73.
OakleyAnn (1986) The Captured Womb: A History of the Medical Care of Pregnant Women. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
74.
OakleyAnn (2016) “The sociology of childbirth: an autobiographical journey through four decades of research.” Sociology of Health & Illness38, 5: 689–705.
75.
RothmanBarbara Katz (1982) In Labor: Women and Power in the Birthplace. New York: W. W. Norton.
76.
RothmanBarbara Katz (2016) A Bun in the Oven: How the Food and Birth Movements Resist Industrialization. New York: New York Univ. Press.
77.
RothmanBarbara Katz (2021) The Biomedical Empire: Lessons We Learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
78.
RouseDwight J.OwenJohnGoldenbergRobert L.CliverSuzanne P. (1996) “The effectiveness and costs of elective cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by ultrasound.” J. of the American Medical Association276, 18: 1480–86.
79.
SantosGonçalo (2020) “Birthing stories and techno-moral change across generations: coping with hospital births and high-tech medicalization in rural South China, 1960s–2010s.” Technology and Culture61, 2: 581–616.
80.
SantosGonçalo (2021) Chinese Village Life Today: Building Families in an Age of Transition. Seattle: Univ. of Washington Press.
81.
SantosGonçalo (Forthcoming) “Good care in childbirth: C-sections as individual or collective decisions.” In HsuBecky (ed.), Weathering the Storm: Family and Community Formation in China. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
82.
SantosGonçaloGottschangSuzanne (2020) “Rethinking reproductive technologies and modernities in time and space.” Technology and Culture61, 2: 549–58.
83.
GonçaloSantosHarrellStevan [eds.] (2017) Transforming Patriarchy: Building Families in an Age of Transition. Seattle: Univ. of Washington Press.
84.
SantosGonçaloSharifNaubaharXingJack L. (2023) “Translating STS in China: disciplinary struggles and future prospects.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society9, 1: 23–49.
85.
ShapinStevenSchafferSimonHobbesThomas (1985) Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
86.
ShiraiChiaki (2020) “Historical dynamism of childbirth in Japan: medicalization and its normative politics, 1868–2017.” Technology and Culture61, 2: 559–80.
87.
SimondsWendyRothmanBarbara K.NormanBari M. (2007) Laboring On: Birth in Transition in the United States. New York: Routledge.
88.
SouzaJ. P.GulmezogluA. M.LumbiganonP.LaopaiboonM.CarroliG.FawoleB.RuyanP., et al. (2010) “Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: the 2004–2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health.” BMC Medicine8: 71. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-71.
TullyKristin P.BallHelen L. (2013) “Misrecognition of need: women’s experiences of and explanations for undergoing cesarean delivery.” Social Science & Medicine85, SC: 103–11.
WangEileen (2017) “Requests for cesarean deliveries: the politics of labor pain and pain relief in Shanghai, China.” Social Science & Medicine173, SC: 1–8.
93.
World Health Organization (1985) “Appropriate technology for birth.” Lancet326, 8452: 436–37.
World Health Organization, Regional Office for the Western Pacific (2015) “People’s Republic of China health system review.” Health Systems in Transition5, 7. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/208229.
96.
WolfJacqueline (2018) Cesarean Section: An American History of Risk, Technology, and Consequence. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins Univ. Press.
97.
WuChia-Ling 吴嘉苓 (2000) “医疗专业, 性别与国家: 台湾助产士兴衰的社会学分析” (Medical professionals, gender, and the state: a sociological analysis of the rise and decline of midwives in Taiwan). 台湾社会学研究4: 191–268.
YanJieWangLongYangYingZhangYaZhangHongguangHeYuanPengZuoqi, et al. (2020) “The trend of caesarean birth rate changes in China after the ‘universal two-child policy’ era: a population-based study in 2013–2018.” BMC Medicine18, 1: 249. doi:10.1186/s12916-020-01714-7.
100.
ZhangJun (2022) “Hardening national boundaries in a globally-connected world: technology, development and nationalism in China.” J. of Contemporary Asia52, 5: 783–804.
101.
ZhangJunSunPeidong (2014) “When are you going to get married?” Parental matchmaking and middle-class women in contemporary urban China.” Pp. 118–44 in DavisDeborahFriedmanSara (eds.), Wives, Husbands, and Lovers: Marriage and Sexuality in Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Urban China. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.
102.
ZhangJunLiuYinghuiMeikleSusanZhengJunchiSunWenyuLiZhu (2008) “Cesarean delivery on maternal request in Southeast China.” Obstetrics & Gynecology111, 5: 1077–82.
103.
ZhangLu 张璐 (2013) “近世稳婆群体的形象建构与社会文化变迁” (Traditional midwife group image depiction and social culture transition). PhD dissertation, Nankai Univ.
104.
ZhangY.BetranA. P.LiX.LiuD.YuanN.ShangL.LinW., et al. (2021) “What is an appropriate caesarean delivery rate for China: a multicentre survey.” BJOG: An International J. of Obstetrics and Gynaecology129, 1: 138–47.
105.
ZhangYihuiGuNingWangZhiqunZhengMingmingHuYaliDaiYimin (2017) “Use of the 10-group classification system to analyze how the population control policy change in China has affected cesarean delivery.” BJOG: International J. of Gynecology & Obstetrics138, 2: 158–63.
106.
ZhuJianfeng (2010) “Mothering expectant mothers: consumption, production, and two motherhoods in contemporary China.” Ethos38, 4: 406–21.
107.
ZhuJianfeng (2013) “Projecting potentiality: understanding maternal serum screening in contemporary China.” Current Anthropology54, S7: S36–S44.
