The cities of Guiyang and Kunming are known among legal scholars, practitioners, and policy makers for hosting two of China’s earliest specialized environmental tribunals, following serious water contamination in the two cities. However, the judicialization of environmental protection appears to be relatively nominal in Kunming and substantial in Guiyang. Why? We contend that, at a critical juncture, different political resources available to local leaders—including their past networks and experiences—led them to implement different strategies to deal with these crises. Under similar conditions, different political resources thus led to divergent outcomes of judicial empowerment. We use process tracing to describe the causal sequence in the adoption and application of policies of judicialization. Whether courts are empowered to operate proactively or conservatively is the result of the strategies of local actors in response to the policy agenda set forth by political leaders and constrained by political leaders’ available political resources. This study contributes to existing theories of court empowerment in authoritarian regimes that have largely relied on national-level or socioeconomic factors. Through a controlled subnational comparison in China, this article provides an alternative theory of divergent practices of court empowerment.
ClarkeDonald (2014) “Judicial innovation in Chinese corporate law.” Pp. 259–72 in HaleyJohnTakenakaToshiko (eds.), Legal Innovations in Asia: Judicial Lawmaking and the Influence of Comparative Law. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
12.
CuiLi 崔丽 and ZhangWenling 张文凌 (2008) “昆明: ‘新政风波’催生法治城市” (Kunming: “New Deal storm” facilitates a city ruled by law). 中国青年报, Dec. 3.
13.
DingYanlin 丁岩林 (2012) “超前抑或滞后——环保法庭的现实困境及应对” (Innovation or delayed practice: the dilemma of environmental courts and responses). 南京大学法律评论 (Fall): 235–45.
14.
DuTuo 杜托 (2009) “省高院院长许前飞网上答疑: 网民最关注环保法庭” (Provincial high court president Xu Qianfei responds online, citizens online inquire about the environmental court). 昆明日报, Feb. 11.
15.
EPB, Guiyang 贵阳市环保局 (2008) 贵阳市环保状况报告 (Report on the environment in Guiyang). Guiyang: Environmental Protection Bureau.
16.
EPB, Guizhou 贵州省环保厅 (2010) 国家重点流域水污染防治规划2009年度实施情况考核组赴安顺检查工作 (2009 National inspection team of plans on prevention and control of water pollution for major river basins visits Anshun). Guizhou Environmental Protection Bureau.
17.
EPB, Kunming 昆明市环保局 (2011) 昆明市受理环境公益诉讼案一审判决 (Kunming’s first environmental public interest lawsuit adjudicated). Kunming Environmental Protection Bureau.
GallagherMaryWangYuhua (2011) “Users and non-users: legal experience and its effect on legal consciousness.” Pp. 204-33 in WooMargaret Y. K.GallagherMary E. (eds.), Chinese Justice: Civil Dispute Resolution in Contemporary China. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
20.
GanNa 甘娜 (2008) “昆明欲将‘一湖两江’治理到底” (Kunming plans to clean up “one lake and two rivers”). 中新社昆明, July28.
21.
GaoJie 高洁 (2010) “环境公益诉讼与环保法庭的生命力” (Environmental public interest litigation and the longevity of special environmental courts). 人民法院报, Jan. 29.
22.
GinsburgThomasMoustafaTamir [eds.] (2008) Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
23.
GongTing (2004) “Dependent judiciary and unaccountable judges: judicial corruption in contemporary China.” China Rev. 4, 2: 33–54.
24.
Guiyang Court 贵阳市中级人民法院 (2007) “贵阳市中级人民法院关于设立环境保护法庭的实施方案” (Implementation plan on the establishment of the environmental court of the Guiyang Intermediate People’s Court). 筑中法发32.
25.
Guiyang Government 贵阳市人民政府 (2008) 贵阳市人民政府工作报告 (Guiyang city government work report).
26.
Guiyang Government (2009) 贵阳市人民政府工作报告 (Guiyang city government work report).
27.
Guizhou Government (2008) 贵州省人民政府工作报告 (Guizhou province government work report).
28.
HaydenRobert M. (1985) “Who wants informal courts? Paradoxical evidence from a Yugoslav attempt to create workers’ courts for labor cases.” American Bar Foundation Research J. 10, 2: 293–326.
29.
HeXin (2009) “Court finance and court responses to judicial reforms: a tale of two Chinese courts.” Law and Policy31, 4: 463–86.
30.
HeXin (2012) “A tale of two Chinese courts: economic development and contract enforcement.” J. of Law and Society39, 3: 384–409.
31.
HirschlRan (2004) Towards Juristocracy: The Origin and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
32.
HuangShenglin 黄生林, WangWuliang 王武良, ZhuZailiang 朱再良, SunYuan 孙远, and ChenLei 陈雷 (2013) “检察机关提起民事公益诉讼问题研究” (On civil public interest litigation filed by prosecutors). 中南大学学报19, 6: 109–13.
33.
IpErik C. (2011) “The Supreme People’s Court and the political economy of judicial empowerment in contemporary China.” Columbia J. of Asian Law24, 2: 367–434.
34.
JahielAbigail R. (1998) “The organization of environmental protection in China.” China Q. 156: 757–87.
35.
JiaHua 贾华 (2013) “两湖一库环保基金每年10万元支持公益诉讼原告” (Environmental protection foundation for the two lakes and one reservoir provides 100,000 yuan every year to support the plaintiff of environmental public interest lawsuits). 贵州日报, Mar. 29.
36.
JiangZhaohui 蒋朝晖 (2010) “如何推开公益诉讼‘拦路虎’?” (How to remove obstacles to public interest lawsuits?). 中国环境报, Nov. 30.
37.
KelloggThomas (2007) “‘Courageous explorers’? Education litigation and judicial innovation in China.” Harvard Human Rights J. 20: 141–88.
Kunming Daily 昆明日报 (2009) “59项新制度获’创新成果奖’” (Fifty-nine new policies awarded “Innovation Prize”). July 16.
41.
Kunming Daily (2010) “热烈祝贺昆明市环境保护联合会成立” (Congratulations to the Kunming Environmental Protection Association). April23.
42.
Kunming Government 昆明市人民政府 (2008) 关于加强‘一湖两江’流域水环境保护工作的若干规定 (Regulations on strengthening water quality and the protection of “one lake and two rivers”).
43.
Kunming Government (2009) 昆明市人民政府工作报告 (Kunming city government work report).
44.
Kunming Government (2010) 昆明市环境公益诉讼救济专项资金管理暂行办法 (Provisional rules on managing earmarked aid funds for environmental public interest lawsuits).
45.
Kunming Procuratorate, Court, Public Security Bureau, and Environmental Protection Bureau 昆明市中级人民检察院、中级人民法院、公安局和环境保护局 (2008) 关于建立环境保护执法协调机制的实施意见 (Implementation of opinions regarding establishing a coordinated environmental protection enforcement system). https://wenku.baidu.com/view/1da74b7b27284b73f2425091.html.
46.
LanRongjie 兰荣杰 (2008) “诉讼规则‘地方化’实证研究——以裁判权配置为视角” (An empirical study of indigenized procedural rules—from the point of decision-making power distribution). 法治与社会发展2: 13–22.
47.
LeiHui 雷辉 (2009) “广东检察院‘插手’环保, 环境公益诉讼现高潮” (Guangdong procuratorate “interferes” in environmental protection, environmental protection public interest litigation peaks). 南方日报, Aug. 26.
48.
LiChunming 李春明 (2014) “打造贵阳绿色司法模式” (Constructing a “green legal administration” model in Guiyang). 贵阳日报, Dec. 17.
49.
LiJie 李桀 (2008) “仇和: 昆明不仅要有金山银山还要有绿水青山” (Qiu He: Kunming shall have both mountains of gold and silver and clean water and green mountains). 生活新报, July29.
50.
LiJun 李军 (2007) “依法治理两湖一库, 确保市民饮水安全” (Administering the two lakes and one reservoir according to law, ensuring the safety of drinking water). “治理两湖一库确保饮水安全”动员大会, Guiyang, Sept. 21.
LiLing (2010) “Corruption in China’s courts.” Pp. 196–220 in PeerenboomRandall (ed.), Judicial Independence in China: Lessons for Global Rule of Law Promotion. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
53.
LiWanxiang 李万祥 (2015) “最高检: 从生态环境领域入手探索检察机关提起行政公益诉” (The Supreme People’s Procuratorate: exploring the standing of the procuratorate in administrative public interest lawsuits by starting from the field of environmental protection). 中国经济网, Jan. 23. http://politics.people.com.cn/n/2015/0123/c70731-26438830.html.
54.
LiZhiping 李挚萍 (2010) “中国环境公益诉讼原告主体的优劣分析和顺序选择” (Different standing in environmental public interest litigation and selection choice). 河北法学科学28, 1: 21–25.
LieberthalKennethLamptonDavid M. (1992) Bureaucracy, Politics, and Decision Making in Post-Mao China. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
58.
LiuAiliang 刘爱良 (2009) “浏阳河水污染事件应催生环保法庭” (Lake Liuyang water pollution will facilitate the emergence of an environmental protection court). 生态经济3: 20–23.
59.
LiuBaijun 刘百军 (2015) “7年6件公益诉讼案仍需制度支持” (Six public interest litigation cases within seven years, institutional support is needed). 法律日报, Feb. 18.
60.
LiuChao 刘超 (2012) “反思环保法庭的制度逻辑” (Reflections on the institutional logic of environmental courts). 法学评论159: 121–28.
61.
LiuYouqing 刘佑清 (2010) “中国民间环保组织起诉政府第一案, 这是谁的功劳?” (The first lawsuit filed by a Chinese NGO: Whose contribution?). 贵州民族报, May14.
62.
LiuZhong 刘忠 (2012) “条条与快快关系下的法院院长产生” (Generating presidents of local courts under the tiao-kuai system). 环球法律评论1: 107–25.
LuoHuashan 罗华山 and WangTaishi 王太师 (2007) “贵阳成立环境保护审判庭和环境保护法庭” (Guiyang establishes an environmental protection trial division and environmental protection court). 贵州日报, Nov. 21.
68.
MaXiaoyingOrtolanoLeonard (2000) Environmental Regulation in China: Institutions, Enforcement, and Compliance. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
69.
MaXueling 马学玲 (2014) “最高法成立环境资源审判庭” (The Supreme People’s Court establishes an environmental protection trial division). 中国青年报, July4.
70.
MahoneyJames (2010) “After KKV: the new methodology of qualitative research.” World Politics62, 1: 120–147.
71.
MengDengke 孟登科 (2010) “抡起大梆打蚊子——云南环境公益诉讼第一案出台内情” (Killing mosquitoes with a big stick: the inside story of the origin of the first environmental protection public interest litigation in Yunnan). 南方周末, Oct. 4.
72.
MichelsonEthan (2011) “Public attitudes toward official justice in Beijing and rural China.” Pp. 169–203 in WooMargaret Y. K.GallagherMary E. (eds.), Chinese Justice: Civil Dispute Resolution in Contemporary China. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
73.
NPC 全国人民代表大会 (1983) Organic Law of the People’s Procuratorates.
PereiraAnthony (2005) Political (In)Justice: Authoritarianism and the Rule of Law in Brazil, Chile, and Argentina. Pittsburgh: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press.
76.
PopovaMaria (2012) “Why doesn’t the Bulgarian judiciary prosecute corruption?” Problems of Post-Communism59, 5: 35–49.
77.
QiJian 齐健 (2010) “我国首例环保基金资助环境公益诉讼案在贵阳宣判” (The first environmental public interest lawsuit funded by environmental protection foundation adjudicated in Guiyang). 新华网, Dec. 30. http://www.xinhuanet.com//legal/2010-12/30/c_12934710.htm.
Qingzhen Court 清镇市人民法院 (2010 [2008]) “Guizhou Province Qingzhen Municipal People’s Court statement on civil mediation.” Chinese Law and Government43, 6 (Nov.–Dec.): 84–86.
SolomonPeter H.Jr (2004) “Judicial power in Russia: through the prism of administrative justice.” Law and Society Rev. 38, 3: 549–81.
86.
SolomonPeter H.Jr.2007. “Courts and judges in authoritarian regimes.” World Politics60, 1: 122–45.
87.
SolomonPeter H.Jr (2015) “Law and courts in authoritarian states.” Pp. 427–34 in WrightJames D. (editor-in-chief), International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed., Vol. 13. Oxford: Elsevier.
88.
SternRachel (2013) Environmental Litigation in China: A Study in Political Ambivalence. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
89.
SternRachel (2014) “The political logic of China’s new environmental courts.” China J. 72: 53–74.
90.
SuMengdi 苏孟迪, YangXue 杨雪, and ZhuangQinghong 庄庆鸿 (2013) “环保法庭的公益诉讼困境” (Obstacles faced by environmental courts to accepting public interest lawsuits). 中国青年报, Nov. 9.
91.
TateNeal C.VallinderTobjorn [eds.] (1995) The Global Expansion of Judicial Power. New York: New York Univ. Press.
92.
TohariaJosÉ J. (1975) “Judicial independence in an authoritarian regime: the case of contemporary Spain.” Law and Society Rev. 9, 3: 475–96.
93.
VanbergGeorg (2011) “Substance vs. procedure: constitutional enforcement and constitutional choice.” J. of Economic Behavior & Organization80: 309–18.
94.
VernerJoel G. (1984) “The independence of supreme courts in Latin America: a review of the literature.” J. of Latin American Studies16: 463–506.
WangAlex (2006) “Role of law in environmental protection in China: recent developments.” Vermont J. of Environmental Law8: 195–224.
97.
WangAlex L.GaoJie (2010) “Environmental courts and the development of environmental public interest litigation in China.” J. of Court Innovation3, 1: 37–50.
98.
WangChenguang (2006) “Law-making functions of the Chinese courts: judicial activism in a country of rapid social changes.” Frontiers of Law in China 4, 4: 524–29.
99.
WangQi 王齐 (2013) “贵州省政府司法通知” (Notice from the Guizhou provincial government). 今黔在线, Dec. 2.
XiChao (2012) “Local courts as legislators? Judicial lawmaking by subnational courts in China.” Statute Law Rev. 34, 1: 39–57.
108.
Xinhua News Agency 新华社 (2015) “云南省委副书记仇和涉嫌严重违纪违法被免职” (Yunnan deputy provincial party secretary Qiu He dismissed due to serious violations of party discipline and laws). 人民日报, Mar. 18.
109.
YanZhijiang 阎志江 (2011) “中华环保联合会状告贵阳一造纸厂污染后胜诉” (All-China Environmental Federation wins suit against a paper mill in Guiyang for pollution). 法制日报, Jan. 12.
Yunnan Court 云南省高级人民法院 (2009) 云南省法院环境保护审判庭建设及审理环境保护案件座谈会纪要 (Minutes of a meeting on the construction of the Yunnan Provincial Court of Environmental Protection and adjudication of environmental protection cases), May13.
