Heilmann and Melton break important new ground in describing the revival of development planning in China and showing how planning is now interwoven with other aspects of the political system, particularly policy formulation and cadre evaluation. Clarification of the instruments planners use and their link to developmental outcomes would improve the argument. Although planners believe their plans are consistent with a market economy, it may turn out that the revival of planning after 2003 was purchased at the cost of significant distortions in the market economy and reduced efficiency.
HuangYasheng (2008) Capitalism with Chinese Characteristics: Entrepreneurship and the State. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
3.
LardyNicholas (2012) Sustaining China’s Economic Growth after the Global Financial Crisis. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute.
4.
NaughtonBarry (2011) “China’s economic policy today: the new state activism.” Eurasian Geography and Economics52, 3 (May–June): 313–29.
5.
State Council (2013) 国务院批转发展改革委等部门关于深化收入分配制度改革若干意见的通知 (Transmitting various views of the NDRC and other departments on deepening the systemic reform of the income distribution system). Guofa [2013] no. 6, Feb. 3. www.shaanxi.gov.cn/0/1/9/39/138946.htm.
6.
WadeRobert (1992) Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press. 2nd ed., with new introduction, 2003.
7.
WuJinglian ([1991] 2013) “A discussion of plan and market as resource allocation mechanisms.” Pp. 213-30 in NaughtonBarry (ed.), Wu Jinglian: Voice of Reform in China. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
