Edward Dimendberg, Film Noir and the Spaces of Modernity (Cambridge, MA, 2004), 172-74.
2.
David O. Stowell, Streets, Railroads, and the Great Strike of 1877 (Chicago , 1999). Norton does not cite it.
3.
A recent anthology, Gijs Mom and Laurent Tissot, eds., Road History: Planning, Building and Use (Neuchâtel, Switzerland, 2007), justifies its mainly European focus by arguing that American highway policies have been much better studied-and, in fact, most of the essays in the book are narrowly focused case studies. A good overview of British policy, past and present, is Stephen Glaister, June Burnham, Handley Stevens, and Tony Travers, Transport Policy in Britain, 2nd ed. (Houndmills, UK, 2006).
4.
Among the worthy recent studies of car culture in other lands are Graeme Davison, Car Wars: How the Car Won Our Hearts and Conquered Our Cities (Crows Nest, Australia, 2004), on Melbourne, Australia; Sean O'Connell, The Car and British Society: Class, Gender and Motoring, 1896-1939 (Manchester, UK, 1998); Kurt Möser, Geschichte des Autos (Frankfurt, Germany, 2002); Federico Paolini, Un paese a quattro ruote: Automobili e società in Italia (Venice, Italy, 2005); and Mathieu Flonneau, Paris et l'automobile, un siècle de passions (Paris, 2005). Brian Ladd, Autophobia: Love and Hate in the Automotive Age (Chicago, 2008), is international in scope but does not attempt systematic cross-national comparisons.
5.
A German study, looking at earlier years, concludes, much like Norton, that car opponents were vocal but "weak in organization": Frank Uekoetter, "Stark im Ton, schwach in der Organisation: Der Protest gegen den frühen Automobilismus,"Geschichte in Wissenschaft und Unterricht54 (2003): 658-70.
