Abstract
This article uses Atlanta as a case study to examine how proponents of two visions of urban renewal came into conflict in the mid-1960s. Atlanta's mayor, aldermen, and city planners, in conjunction with a few white downtown business associations and some of the city's African American middle class, believed that the purpose of federal renewal funding was to ensure economic growth for the city, either by protecting central business district property values from nearby slums or by constructing new revenue-generating structures. Many of the city's poorer residents rallied alongside housing advocates, civil rights organizations, and neighborhood activists, believing that federal renewal funding should be used to replace deteriorating housing stock, whether with new public housing or low-cost housing built by private developers. This article demonstrates how and where leaders expressing these two visions of urban renewal competed for limited funds, site selection, and planning control.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
