Abstract
Existing literature on the explosion of playgrounds at the beginning of the twentieth century focuses on the theories and self descriptions of the leadership of the playground movement, particularly on their ideas about how and why children's play needed to be supervised. Actual playgrounds are represented as a product of the campaign to control children's play. However, supervision was in fact a controversial aspect of the playground movement, which occasionally even cost the movement funding and public support. This paper argues that any physical development must be understood in relation to complex urban land politics, in which the interests of a variety of stakeholders are decisive. Children from the target populations wanted playgrounds, if not the play leaders that accompanied them. Real estate professionals pushed for playgrounds, because they increased and stabilized land values. City planners also provided crucial support, because playgrounds increased land values and tax revenue.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
