Behavioral and Emotional Problem Scales of the Behavioral Assessment for Children of African Heritage (BACAH)

Abstract

Using extensive African American community input, Black researchers developed the Behavioral Assessment for Children of African Heritage (BACAH). Information regarding its strength dimensions is published but not its behavioral and emotional problem scales. Rational (i.e., expert opinion and mathematical) procedures grouped BACAH problem item responses from 1,465 youth, parent, and teacher informants into eight cross-informant scales labeled Anxiety-, Attention/Hyperactive-, Conduct-, Depression-, Hypomania/Mania-, Oppositional-Defiance-, Self-Destructive-, and Reality-Contact-Problems. Data analyses showed no response bias across child gender, socioeconomic status, or age groupings, but bias emerged across informant type, referral status, and rating scale type (i.e., presence and magnitude vs. concern levels regarding problems). Item linking reduced this bias. Items on each BACAH scale discriminate well for problem levels they assess and capably measure children’s problem levels, ranging from moderately below to above the mean. This study’s foundation and findings provide professionals and their test respondents with culturally valid, user friendly, economical, and highly flexible, clinical/research tools to assess Black children’s functioning.

Keywords

Black children adolescents assessment behavioral emotional problems

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Achenbach

T. M.

Rescorla

L. A.

(2001). Manual for the ASEBA school-aged forms & profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth and Families.

Achenbach

T. M.

Rescorla

L. A.

(2004). The Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment for ages 1.5 to 18 years. In Maurish

M. E.

(Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment: Vol. 2: Instruments for children and adolescents (3rd ed.; pp. 179-213). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Chen

F. F.

(2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464-504.

de Ayala

R. J.

(2009). The theory and practice of item response theory. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Edelen

M. O.

Reeve

B. B.

(2007). Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement. Quality of Life Research, 16(5), 5-18.

Embretson

S. E.

Reise

S. P.

(2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Gibbons

R. D.

Bock

R. D.

Hedeker

Weiss

D. J.

Segawa

Bhaumik

D. K.

… Stover

(2007). Full-information item bifactor analysis of graded response data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 4-19.

Gross

Fogg

Young

Ridge

Cowell

Sivan

Richardson

(2007). Reliability and validity of the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory with African-American and Latino parents of young children. Research in Nursing & Health, 30, 213-233.

Grothe

K. B.

Dutton

G. R.

Jones

G. N.

Bodenlos

Ancona

Brantly

P. J.

(2005). Validation of the Beck Depression Inventory-II in a low-income African American sample of medical outpatients. Psychological Assessment, 17, 110-114.

10.

Hollingshead

A. B.

(1975). Four factor index of social status. New Haven, CT: Yale University Department of Sociology.

11.

Joe

(2006). Implications of national suicide trends for social work practice. Child and Adolescent Social Work, 23, 458-471.

12.

Knight

G. P.

Hill

N. E.

(1998). Measurement equivalence in research involving minority adolescents. In McLoyd

V. C.

Steinberg

(Eds.), Studying minority adolescents: Conceptual, methodological, and theoretical issues (pp. 183-210). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

13.

Koro-Ljungberg

Bussing

Williamson

Wilder

Mills

(2008). African-American teenagers’ stories of attention/deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 17, 467-485.

14.

Kuperminc

G. P.

Blatt

S. J.

Shahar

Henrich

Leadbeater

B. J.

(2004). Cultural equivalence and cultural variance in longitudinal associations of young adolescent self-definition and interpersonal relatedness to psychological and school adjustment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33, 13-30.

15.

Lambert

M. C.

Essau

C. A.

Schmitt

Samms-Vaughan

M. E.

(2007). Dimensionality and psychometric invariance of the Youth Self-Report Form of the Child Behavior Checklist in cross-national settings. Assessment, 14, 231-245.

16.

Lambert

M. C.

Markle

Bellas

V. F.

(2001). Psychopathology and assessment in African American children and families: A historical, ecological, and strength-based perspective. In Neal-Barnett

Contreras

Kerns

K. A.

(Eds.), Forging links: A clinical developmental understanding of African American children (pp. 1-26). Westport, CT: Prager.

17.

Lambert

M. C.

Rowan

G. T.

Kim

Rowan

S. A.

A. S.

Kirsh

E. A.

Williams

(2005). Assessment of behavioral and emotional strengths in Black children: Development of the Behavioral Assessment for Children of African Heritage (BACAH). Journal of Black Psychology, 31, 321-351.

18.

Lambert

M. C.

Rowan

G. T.

Lyubansky

Ross

(2002). Do problems of clinic-referred African-American children overlap with the Child Behavior Checklist? Journal of Child and Family Studies, 11, 271-285.

19.

Lengua

L. J.

Sadwoski

C. A.

Friedrich

W. N.

Fisher

(2001). Rationally and empirically developed dimensions of children’s symptomatology: Expert ratings and confirmatory factor analyses of the CBCL. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 683-698.

20.

Marshall

G. N.

Orlando

Jaycox

L. H.

Foy

D. W.

Blezberg

(2002). Development and validation of a modified version of the Peritraumatic Dissociative Questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 14, 123-134.

21.

Miller

R. W.

Nigg

J. T.

Miller

R. L.

(2009). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in African American children: What can be concluded from the past ten years. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 77-86.

22.

Orlando

Marshall

G. N.

(2002). Differential item functioning in a Spanish translation of the PTSD Checklist: Detection and evaluation of impact. Psychological Assessment, 14, 50-59.

23.

Panter

A. T.

Reeve

B. B.

(2002). Assessing tobacco beliefs among youth using item response theory models. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 68(Suppl. 1), 21-39.

24.

Reise

S. P.

Morizot

Hays

R. D.

(2007). The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures. Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care & Rehabilitation, 16(1 Suppl.), 19-31.

25.

Rousseau

Measham

Bathiche-Suidan

(2008). DSM-IV, culture and child psychiatry. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 17, 69-75.

26.

Samejima

(2010). The general graded response model. In Nering

M. L.

Ostini

(Eds.), Handbook of polytomous item response theory models (pp. 77-107). New York, NY: Routledge.

27.

Sivan

A. B.

Ridge

Gross

Richardson

Cowell

(2008). Analysis of two measures of child behavior problems by African American, Latino, and non-Hispanic Caucasian parents of young children: A focus group study. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 23, 20-27.

28.

Stark

Chernyshenko

O. S.

Drasgow

(2006). Detecting DIF with CFA and IRT: Toward a unified strategy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1292-1306.

29.

Stark

Chernyshenko

O. S.

Guenole

(2011). Can subject matter experts’ ratings of statement extremity be used to streamline the development of unidimensional pairwise preference scales? Organizational and Research Methods, 14, 256-278.

30.

Stockdale

G. D.

Gridley

B. E.

Balogh

D. W.

Holtgraves

(2002). Confirmatory factor analysis of single- and multiple-factor competing models of the Dissociative Experiences Scale in a nonclinical sample. Assessment, 9, 94-106.

31.

Stokes

G. S.

Searcy

C. A.

(1999). Specification of scales in biodata form development: Rational vs. empirical and global vs. specific. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 7, 72-85.

32.

Thissen

(2001). IRTLRDIF v.2.0b: Software for the computation of the statistics involved in item response theory likelihood-ratio tests for differential item functioning. Unpublished manuscript, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

33.

Thissen

Chen

W. H.

Bock

R. D.

(2003). MULTILOG 7 for Windows: Multiple category item analysis and test scoring using item response theory [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientic Software International.

34.

Thomas

M. L.

(2011). The value of item response theory in clinical assessment: A review. Assessment, 18, 291-307.

35.

Vigna

J. F.

Hernandez

B C.

Kelley

M. L.

Gresham

F. M.

(2010). Coping behavior in hurricane-affected African American youth: Psychometric properties of the Kidcope. Journal of Black Psychology, 36, 98-121.

36.

Woodland

M. H.

(2008). A validity study of scores on the Personal and Academic Self-Concept Inventory based on a sample of Black college males. Journal of Black Psychology, 34, 452-478.