This article reports research on the administrative role concept. The authors use the inductive research technique Q-methodology to probe the belief systems of 69 public administrators about their administrative roles and responsibilities. Results show that these administrators perceive five distinct roles. The authors labeled these roles stewards of the public interest, adapted realists, businesslike utilitarians, resigned custodians, and practical idealists. There is slight evidence of a neutral competence role as suggested by the Pendleton Act of 1883, Woodrow Wilson, and others (resigned custodian) but more support of a proactive administrative role (steward of the public interest) that overlaps with the role described by recent scholars such as the Blacksburg group. Another important finding is that three of the role conceptions appear to reject being responsive to the desires of elected officials. The five roles are examined in more detail, and the implications for future research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Society for Public Administration. (ASPA) . (1985). Code of ethics and implementation guidelines. Washington, DC: Author.
2.
Ammons, D. N. , & Newell, C. (1988). City managers don’t make policy: “A lie; let’s face it.”Public Management, 70, 14-18.
3.
Appleby, P. H. (1945). Big democracy. New York: Knopf.
4.
Appleby, P.H. (1949). Policy and administration. Birmingham, AL: University of Alabama Press.
5.
Banks, J. S. , & Weingast, B. R. (1992). The political control of bureaucracies under asymmetric information. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 509-525.
6.
Bawn, K. (1995). Political control versus expertise: Congressional choices about administrative procedures. American Political Science Review, 89, 62-73.
7.
Bowman, J. S. (1982-1983). A professional perspective for PA. The Bureaucrat, 11, 49-52.
8.
Bowman, J.S. (Ed.). (1991). Ethical frontiers in public management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9.
Box, R. C. (1992). The administrator as trustee of the public interest. Administration & Society, 24, 323-345.
10.
Brewer, G. A. , & Maranto, R. A. (1998, September 3-6). Comparing the roles of political appointees and career bureaucrats in the U.S. Federal Executive Branch. Paper delivered at the 1998 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.
11.
Brewer, G. A. , Selden, S. C., & Facer, R. H. (in press). Individual conceptions of public service motivation. Public Administration Review.
12.
Brint, S. (1994). In an age of experts: The changing role of professionals in politics and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
Brown, S.R. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
14.
Brown, S. R. (1991-1992). Q Methodology and Qualitative Research. Available online: http://www.rz.unibw-muenchen.de/~p41bsmk/qmethod/srbqhc.htm
15.
Brown, S. R. , Durning, D., & Selden, S. C. (1998). Q methodology. In G. J. Miller & M. L. Whicker (Eds.), Handbook of data analysis and quantitative methods in public administration. New York: Marcel Dekker.
16.
Brown, S. R. , & Ungs, T. D. (1970). Representativeness and the study of political behavior: An application of Q technique to reactions to the Kent State incident. Social Science Quarterly, 51, 514-526.
17.
Bruce, W. (1995). Ideals and conventions: Ethics for public administration. Public Administration Review, 55, 111-116.
18.
Cooper, T. L. (1987). Hierarchy, virtue, and the practice of public administration: A perspective for normative ethics. Public Administration Review, 47, 320-328.
19.
Cooper, T. L. (Ed.). (1994). Handbook of administrative ethics. New York: Marcel Dekker.
20.
Cunningham, R. , & Olshfski, D. (1986). Interpreting state administrator-legislator relationships. Western Political Science Quarterly, 39, 104-117.
21.
Denhardt, R. B. , & deLeon, L. (1995). Great thinkers in personnel management. In J. Rabin, Thomas Vocino, W. Bartley Hildreth, & Gerald J. Miller (Eds.), Classics of public personnel policy (pp. 21-41). New York: Marcel Dekker.
22.
Denison, D. R. (1996). What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A native’s point of view on a decade of paradigm wars. Academy of Management Review, 21, 619-654.
23.
Doig, J. W. , & Hargrove, E. C. (1987). Leadership and innovation: A biographical perspective on entrepreneurs in government. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
24.
Downs, A. (1967). Inside bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown.
25.
Durant, R. F. (1991). Whither bureaucratic influence a cautionary note. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1, 461-476.
26.
Fannin, W. R. (1983). City manager policy roles as a source of city council/city manager conflict. International Journal of Public Administration, 5, 381-399.
27.
Finer, H. (1941). Administrative responsibility in democratic government. Public Administration Review, 1, 335-350.
28.
Frank, A. G. (1963-1964). Administrative role definition and social change. Human Organization, 22, 238-242.
29.
Frederickson, H. G. (1980). The new public administration. University: The University of Alabama Press.
30.
Frederickson, H.G. (Ed.).(1993). Ethics and public administration. Armonk, NY:M.E.Sharpe.
31.
Friedrich, C. J. (1940). Public policy and the nature of administrative responsibility. In C. J. Friedrich & E. S. Mason (Eds.), Public policy (pp. 3-24). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
Gaines, L. K. , Van Tubergen, N., & Paiva, M. A. (1984). Police officer perceptions of promotion as a source of motivation. Journal of Criminal Justice, 12, 265-275.
33.
Gilbert, C. E. (1959). The framework of administrative responsibility. Journal of Politics, 21, 373-407.
34.
Gore, A. (1994). The new job of the federal executive. Public Administration Review, 54, 317-321.
35.
Gruber, J. E. (1987). Controlling bureaucracies: Dilemmas in democratic governance. Berkeley: University of California Press.
36.
Herring, E. P. (1936). Public administration and the public interest. New York: McGraw-Hill.
37.
Hickson, D. J. , Pugh, Derek S., & Pheysey, Diana C. (1969). Operations technology and organization structure: An empirical reappraisal. Administration Science Quarterly, 14, 378-397.
38.
Hiruy, M. (1987). Exploring the perspectives of ethics: The case of public administrators in the United States. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio.
39.
Immerman, R. J. (1970). Administrative roles: An empirical study of bureaucratic attitudes to decision-making. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, The City University of New York.
40.
Ingraham, P. , & Ban, C. (1986). Models of public management: Are they useful to federal managers in the 1980s?Public Administration Review, 50, 152-160.
41.
Ingraham, P. , & Rosenbloom, D. (1990). Political foundations of the American federal service: Rebuilding a crumbling base. Public Administration Review, 50, 210-219.
42.
Johnson, P. E. (1973). Functional typologies of administrators: A Q-Sort analysis. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, The University of Iowa.
43.
Jos, P. H. , & Tompkins, M. E. (1995). Administrative practice and the waning promise of professionalism for public administration. American Review of Public Administration, 25, 207-229.
44.
Kammerer, G. M. (1963). Role diversity of city managers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 8, 421-442.
45.
Kaufman, H. (1956). Emerging conflicts in the doctrines of public administration. American Political Science Review, 50, 1057-1073.
46.
Kaufman, H. (1969). Administrative decentralization and political power. Public Administration Review, 29, 3-15.
47.
Kaufman, H. (1990). The end of an alliance: Public administration in the 1980’s. In N. B. Lynn & A. Wildavsky (Eds.), Public administration: The state of the discipline. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
48.
Kim, J. , & Mueller, C. W. (1978). Factor analysis: Statistical methods and practical issues. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
49.
Lind, N. S. (1991). Anthony downs life cycle theory of organizations: An empirical test. Southeastern Political Review, 19, 228-247.
50.
Long, N. E. (1949). Power and administration. Public Administration Review, 9, 257-265.
51.
Long, N. E. (1952). Bureaucracy and constitutionalism. American Political Science Review, 39, 808-818.
52.
Lowi, T. (1995). Lowi responds. Public Administration Review, 55, 490-494.
53.
Maranto, R. , & Skelley, B. D. (1992). Neutrality: An enduring principle of the federal service. American Review of Public Administration, 22, 173-187.
54.
Marshall, J. , & Stewart, R. (1981). Managers’ job perceptions: Part 1. Their overall frameworks and working strategies. Journal of Management Studies, 18, 177-190.
55.
McCubbins, M. , Noll, R. G., & Weingast, B. (1987). Administrative procedures as instruments of political control. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 3, 243-277.
56.
McKeown, B. , & Thomas, D. (1988). Q-methodology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
57.
Meier, K. J. (1993a). Politics and bureaucracy: Policymaking in the fourth branch of government (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
58.
Meier, K. J. (1993b). Representative bureaucracy: A theoretical and empirical exposition. In J. L. Perry (Ed.), Research in public administration (Vol. 2). Greenwich, CN: JAI.
59.
Meier, K. J. (1997). Bureaucracy and democracy: The case for more bureaucracy and less democracy. Public Administration Review, 57, 193-200.
60.
Meier, K. J. , & Smith, K. B. (1994). Representative democracy and representative bureaucracy: Examining the top-down and bottom-up linkages. Social Science Quarterly, 75, 790-804.
61.
Meier, K. J. , Wrinkle, R. D., & Polinard, J. L. (1995). Politics, bureaucracy, and agricultural policy: An alternative view of political control. American Politics Quarterly, 23, 427-461.
62.
Miner, J. B. (1993). Role motivation theories. New York: Routledge.
63.
Moe, T. M. (1982). Regulatory performance and presidential administration. American Journal of Political Science, 26, 197-224.
64.
Montjoy, R. S. , & Watson, D. J. (1995). A case for reinterpreted dichotomy of politics and administration as a professional standard in council-manager government?Public Administration Review, 55, 231-239.
65.
Nalbandian, J. (1981). From compliance to consultation: The changing role of the public personnel administrator. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 1, 37-51.
66.
Nalbandian, J. (1989). The contemporary role of city managers. American Review of Public Administration, 19, 261-277.
67.
Nalbandian, J. (1990). Tenets of contemporary professionalism in local government. Public Administration Review, 50, 654-661.
68.
Newell, C. , & Ammons, D. N. (1987). Role emphasis of city managers and other municipal executives. Public Administration Review, 47, 246-252.
69.
Newell, C. , Glass, J. J., & Ammons, D. N. (1989). City manager roles in a changing political environment. In H. G. Frederickson (Ed.), Ideal and practice in council manager government. Washington, DC: International City Management Association.
70.
Palumbo, D. J. (1969). Power and role specificity in organization theory. Public Administration Review, 29, 237-248.
71.
Perry, J. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6, 5-22.
72.
Perry, J. L. , & Wise, L. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50, 367-373.
73.
Pugh, D. L. (1991). The origins of ethical frameworks in public administration. In J. S. Bowman (Ed.), Ethical frontiers in public management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
74.
Rainey, H. G. (1982). Reward preferences among public and private managers: In search of the service ethic. American Review of Public Administration, 16, 288-302.
75.
Redford, E. S. (1969). Democracy in the administrative state. New York: Oxford University Press.
76.
Romzek, B. S. , & Dubnick, M. J. (1987). Accountability and the public service: Lessons from the Challenger tragedy. Public Administration Review, 47, 227-238.
77.
Rourke, F. E. (1991). American bureaucracy in a changing political setting. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1, 111-129.
78.
Sabatier, P. A. , Loomis, J., & McCarthy, C. (1995). Hierarchical controls, professional norms, local constituencies, and budget maximization: An analysis of U.S. Forest Service planning decisions. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 204-243.
79.
Schmidt, D. R. (1995). The presidential appointment process, task environment pressures, and regional office case processing. Political Research Quarterly, 48, 381-402.
80.
Schneider, B. R. (1993). A comparative analysis of bureaucratic preferences and insulation. Comparative Politics, 25, 331-351.
81.
Schubert, G. A. (1957). ‘The public interest’ in administrative decision-making: Theorem, theosophy, or theory?American Political Science Review, 51, 346-368.
82.
Selden, S. C. (1997). The promise of representative bureaucracy: Diversity and responsiveness in a government agency. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
83.
Shumavon, D. H. , & Hibbeln, H. K. (1986). Administrative discretion: Problems and prospects. In D. H. Shumavon & H. K. Hibbeln (Eds.), Administrative discretion and public policy implementation. New York: Praeger.
84.
Stephenson, W. (1953). The study of behavior: Q-technique and its methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
85.
Stever, J. A. (1988). The end of public administration. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Transnational.
86.
Stivers, C. (1993). Reflections on the role of personal narrative in social science. Signs, 18, 408-426.
87.
Svara, J. H. (1988). The complementary roles of officials in council manager government. In Municipal Year Book 1988. Washington, DC: International City Management Association.
88.
Svara, J. H. (1991). Council and administrator perspectives on the city manager’s role: Conflict, divergence, or congruence?Administration & Society, 23, 227-246.
89.
Vroman, H. W. (1972). Types of administrators and some of their beliefs—A Q factor analysis. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, the University of Iowa, Iowa City.
90.
Wamsley, G. L. , Bacher, R. N., Kronengberg, P. S., Rohr, J. A., Stivers, C. M., White, O. F., & Wolf, J. F. (1990). Refounding public administration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
91.
Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy. New York: Basic Books.
92.
(Reprinted from Political Science Quarterly, 2, 1887)
93.
Wood, B. D. , & Waterman, R. W. (1991). The dynamics of political control of the bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, 85, 801-850.
94.
Wood, B. D. , & Waterman, R. W. (1993). The dynamics of political-bureaucratic adaptation. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 497-529.
95.
Wood, B. D. , & Waterman, R. W. (1994). Bureaucratic discretion: The role of bureaucracy in a democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview.
96.
Zisk, B. H. , Eulau, H., & Prewitt, K. (1965). City councilmen and the group struggle: A typology of role orientations. Journal of Politics, 27, 618-646.
