Barber, B. (1984). Strong democracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
2.
Burke, J. P. (1996). Responsibility, politics, and community. Public Administration Review, 56(6), 596-599.
3.
Caudill, D. S. (1997). Identifying law’s unconscious: Disciplinary and rhetorical contexts. Washington and Lee Law Review, 54(3), 1075-1990.
4.
Cooper, T. L. (1996). The paradox of responsibility: An enigma. Public Administration Review, 56(6), 599-604.
5.
Farmer, D. (1995). The language of public administration. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
6.
Fox, C. J. , & Miller, H. T. (1995). Postmodern public administration. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Hansen, K. N. (1998). Identifying facets of democratic administration: The empirical referents of discourse. Administration & Society, 30, 443-461.
8.
Harmon, M. M. (1995) Responsibility as paradox: A critique of rational discourse on government. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Marshall, G. (1996). Deconstructing administrative behavior: The “real” as representation. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 18, 117-127.
10.
McSwite, O. C. (1997a). Legitimacy in public administration: A discourse analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
McSwite, O. C. (1997b). Skepticism, doubt, and the real: A gesture toward intellectual community and a new identity for public administration. In H. T. Miller & C. J. Fox (Eds.), Postmodernism, reality, and public administration: A discourse. Burke, VA: Chatelaine Press.
12.
Sandel, M. J. (1996). Democracy’s discontent: American in search of a public philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
Wamsley, G. L. (1996). A public philosophy and ontological discourse as the basis for normatively grounded theorizing in public administration. In G. L. Wamsley & J. F. Wolf (Eds.), Refounding democratic public administration: Modern paradoxes, postmodern challenges. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.