The particular pattern the bureaucratic development in Turkey has evinced suggests that legal rationality is a prerequisite for the successful institutionalization of rational productivity. Whereas there is a zero-sum type of relationship between patrimonialism on one hand and legal rationality and rational productivity on the other, there is a positive-sum type of relationship between legal rationality and rational productivity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aberbach, J. D. , & Rockman, B. A. (1994). Civil servants and policy makers: Neutral or responsive competence?Governance, 7, 461-463.
2.
Ada, Z. (1991). Faiz politikasivi Türk bankacilik sistemi üzerindeki etkileri [Interest rate policy and its impact on the Turkish banking system]. Ankara, Turkey: Devlet Planlama TeÕkilati.
3.
And, M. (1956). Türkiye’de aydinlar [Intellectuals in Turkey]. Forum, 41, 25-26.
4.
Atiyas , ¤. (1996). Uneven governance and fiscal failure: The adjustment experience in Turkey. In L. Frischtak & ¤. Atiyas (Eds.), Governance, leadership and communication: Building constituencies for economic reform. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
BaÕbakan Turgut Özal’in birinci basin toplantisi (Prime Minister Turgut Özal’s first press conference). (1984). Ankara, Turkey: BaÕbakanlik Yayin Merkezi.
7.
Beetham, D. (1987). Bureaucracy. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
8.
Birnbaum, P. (1987). France: Polity with a strong state. In M. Heper (Ed.), The state and public bureaucracies: A comparative perspective. New York: Greenwood.
9.
Blanning, T.C.W. (1987). The French Revolution: Aristocrats versus bourgeois?London: Macmillan.
10.
BuŠra, A. (1994). State and business in modern Turkey: A comparative study. Albany: State University of New York Press.
11.
Bütün yönleriyle Özal ve dönemi, 1993-1993 [Özal and his period in all their aspects] (1993). Istanbul, Turkey: Hürgüç gazetecilik.
Chambers, R. L. (1964). The civil bureaucracy: Turkey. In R. E. Ward & D. A. Rustow (Eds.), Political modernization in Japan and Turkey. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
Çekirge, F. (1993, August 1). SaracoŠlu siyasete giriyor [SaracoŠlu enters politics]. Sabah [¤stanbul Daily], p. 5.
15.
Devlet Planlama TeÕkilati . (1985). Fifth five-year development plan, 1985-1989. Ankara, Turkey: Author.
16.
Devlet Planlama TeÕkilati (1990). 1980’den 1990’a makro ekonomik politikalar. Türkiye ekonomisindeki geliÕ melerin analizi ve bazi deŠerlendirmeler [Macroeconomic policies, 1980-1990: An analysis of the developments in Turkish economy and some evaluations]. Ankara, Turkey: Author.
17.
Devlet Planlama TeÕkilati . (1996). Ekonomik ve sosyal göstergeler: 1950-1995 [Economic and social indicators: 1950-1995]. Ankara, Turkey: Author.
18.
Diamant, A. (1962). The bureaucratic model: Max Weber rejected, rediscovered, reformed. In F. Heady & S. L. Stokes (Eds.), Papers in comparative public administration. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
19.
Dodd, C. H. (1965). Administrative reform in Turkey. Public Administration (London),43, 71-83.
20.
Dyson, K.H.F. (1977). Party, state and bureaucracy in Western Europe. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
21.
Ehrmann, H. W. (1968). Politics in France. Boston: Little, Brown.
22.
Evin, A. (1996). Bureaucracy in Turkish politics. Private View (Quarterly International Review of the Turkish Industrialists’ and Businessmen’s Association), 1. 49.
23.
Findley, C. V. (1980). Bureaucratic reform in the Ottoman Empire: The Sublime Porte, 1789-1922. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
Finer, S. E. (1975). State and nation-building in France: The role of the military. In C. Tilly (Ed.), The formation of national states in Western Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
Gökmen, Y. (1992). Özal sendromu [The Özal phenomenon]. Ankara, Turkey: V yay™nlar™.
26.
Göle, N. (1986). Mühendisler ve ideoloji: Öncü devrimcilerden yenilikçi seçkinlere [Engineers and ideology: From pioneering revolutionaries to innovative elites]. ¤stanbul, Turkey: ¤letiÕim.
27.
Hale, W. (1994). Turkish politics and the military. London: Routledge.
28.
Harris, G. (1988). The role of the military in Turkey: Guardians or decision makers? In M. Heper & A. Evin (Eds.), State, democracy and the military: Turkey in the 1980s. New York: de Gruyter.
29.
Heper, M. (1976a). The political modernization as reflected in bureaucratic change: The Turkish bureaucracy and a “historical bureaucratic empire” tradition. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 7, 517-521.
30.
Heper, M. (1976b). The recalcitrance of the Turkish public bureaucracy to bourgeois politics: A multi-factor political stratification analysis. Middle East Journal, 30, 485-500.
31.
Heper, M. (1977). Negative bureaucratic politics in a modernizing context: The Turkish case. Journal of South Asian and Middle Eastern Studies, 1, 65-84.
32.
Heper, M. (1979). Patrimonialism in the Ottoman-Turkish bureaucracy. Asian and African Studies, 13, 3-21.
33.
Heper, M. (1980). Center and periphery in the Ottoman Empire: With special reference to the nineteenth century. International Political Science Review, 1, 81-105.
34.
Heper, M. (1984). Atatürk and the civil bureaucracy. In J.M. Landau (Ed.), Atatürk and the modernization of Turkey. Boulder, CO: Westview.
35.
Heper, M. (1985a). The state and public bureaucracies: A comparative and historical perspective. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 27, 86-110.
36.
Heper, M. (1985b). The state tradition in Turkey. Walkington, England: Eothen Press.
37.
Heper, M. (1989). Motherland Party governments and bureaucracy in Turkey, 1983-1988. Governance, 2, 460-471.
38.
Heper, M. (1990). The state and debureaucratization: The Turkish case. International Social Science Journal, 126, 611-615.
39.
Heper, M. (Ed.) (1991). Strong state and economic interest groups: The post-1980 Turkish experience. New York: de Gruyter.
40.
Heper, M. , Kim, C. L., & Pai, S. T. (1980). The role of bureaucracy and regime types: A comparative study of Turkish and South Korean higher civil servants. Administration & Society, 12, 137-157.
41.
¤dari Reform DaniÕma Kurulu. (1972). ¤darenin yeniden düzenlenmesi: ¤lkeler ve öneriler[Bureaucratic reform: Principles and proposals]. Ankara, Turkey: Sevinç Matbaasi.
42.
Ilchman, W. I. (1969). Productivity, administrative reform and antipolitics: Dilemmas for developing states. In R. Braibanti (Ed.), Political and administrative development. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
43.
Kazamias, A. (1966). Education and the quest for modernity in Turkey. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44.
Kazdal, ¤ . (1990). Siyasi iktidar ve Özal devri [The administration in Özal period]. ¤stanbul, Turkey: Ihya.
45.
Kongar, E. (1996). Ben müsteÕarken [When I was undersecretary]. ¤stanbul, Turkey: Remzi Kitabevi.
46.
KozanoŠlu, H. (1993). Yuppiler, prensler ve bizim kuÕak [Yuppies, princes and our generation]. ¤stanbul, Turkey: ¤letisim.
47.
Krygier, M. (1979). Saint Simon, Marx and the non-governed society. In E. Kamenka & M. Krygier (Eds.), Bureaucracy: The career of a concept. London: Edward Arnold.
48.
Landau, J. (1974). Radical politics in modern Turkey. Leiden, the Netherlands: E. J. Brill.
49.
Mardin, Ô . (1973). Center periphery relations: A key to Turkish politics?Daedalus, 102, 169-190.
50.
Mardin, Ô . (1975). Atatürk, bürokrasi ve rasyonellik [Atatürk, bureaucracy and rationality]. In Atatürk devrimleri I. milletlerarasy sempozyumu bildirileri: 10-14 Aralyk 1973. ¤stanbul, Turkey: Sermet Matbaasi.
51.
Mardin, Ô . (1980). Turkey: The transformation of an economic code. In E. Özbudun & A. Ulusan (Eds.), The political economy of income distribution in Turkey. New York: Holmes and Meirs.
52.
Milliyet [¤stanbul daily] (p. 7). (1994, May 3).
53.
Myers, A. R. (1975). Parliaments and estates in Europe to 1789. London: Thames and Hudson.
54.
Okyar, O. (1968). Universities in Turkey. Minerva, 213-243.
55.
ÖmürgönülÕen, U. (1995). An analysis of the government’s strategy concerning the staff cutbacks in the Turkish civil service: Cutback or restraint?Leicester, UK: Leicester University, Public Sector Economic Research Centre/Management Centre.
56.
Presthus, R. V. (1961). Weberian v. welfare bureaucracy in traditional society. Administrative Science Quarterly, 6, 1-24.
57.
Roos, L. L. , & Roos, N. P. (1971). Managers of modernization: Organizations and elites in Turkey. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.
58.
Rosenberg, H. (1958). Bureaucracy, aristocracy and autocracy: The Prussian experience, 1660-1815. Boston: Beacon Press.
59.
Riggs, F. W. (1969). Bureaucratic politics in comparative perspective. Journal of Comparative Administration, 1, 5-38.
60.
Southern, D. (1979). Germany. In F. F. Ridley (Ed.), Government and administration in Western Europe. Oxford, UK: Martin Robertson.
61.
State Planning Organization (1992, December). The Turkish economy (Working paper). Ankara, Turkey: Author.
62.
Suleiman, E. N. (1974). Politics, power and bureaucracy in France: The administrative elite. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
63.
Szyliowicz, J. S. (1971). Elite recruitment in Turkey: The role of the Mülkiye. World Politics, 23, 371-398.
64.
Taylor, A.J.P. (1945). The course of German history. London: Methuen.
65.
Tigrel, A. (1991). Transition to a market economy: The case of Turkey. In State Planning Organization (Ed.), Report of the international symposium on Turkey’s experience in developing a market economy and its relevance for the reforming countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Ankara, Turkey: State Planning Organization.
66.
Turkish Industrialists’ and Businesspersons’ Association . (1983). Kamu bürokrasisi [The public bureaucracy]. ¤stanbul, Turkey: TÜS¤AD.
67.
Ülgener, S. (1983). Zihniyet, aydinlar ve izm’ler [Mentality, intellectuals and ism’s]Ankara, Turkey: Mayas.
68.
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (Vol. 1). Berkeley: University of California Press.
69.
Weiker, W. F. (1968). The Ottoman bureaucracy: Modernization and reform. Administrative Science Quarterly, 13, 451-470.
70.
Yüzyil Biterken Cumhuriyet Dönemi Türkiye Ansiklopedisi (Encyclopedia of Republican Turkey at the Turn of the Century). (1996). ¤stanbul, Turkey: ¤letiÕim Yay™nlar™.
