Public administration writers have placed considerable faith in the power of social science to improve the practice of public administration. This article argues that such faith derives from their vision of the state as a purposive association. However, because we live in what is essentially a civil association rather than a purposive association, there are severe limits on the knowledge that social science can provide for practice. Public administration inquiry, it is concluded, needs to devote more attention to the nature of the civil association in which it operates, particularly in regard to our constitutional system of governance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bacon, F. (1942). Essays and New Atlantis. Roslyn, NY: Walter J. Black.
2.
Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
Barzelay, M. (1994). The post-bureaucratic paradigm in historical perspective. In F. S. Lane (Ed.), Current issues in public administration. New York: St. Martin's.
4.
Behn, R. D. (1991). Leadership counts: Lessons for public managers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
Behn, R. D. (1995). The big questions of public management. Public Administration Review, 55, 313-325.
6.
Buchanan, J. M. (1979). What should economists do?Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Press.
7.
Carroll, J. D., & Ingraham, P. W. (1996). The reinvention game. Public Administration Review, 56, 229-304.
8.
Cohen, S. (1988). The effective public manager: Achieving success in government. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9.
Dahl, R. A. (1947). The science of public administration: Three problems. Public Administration Review, 7, 1-11.
10.
Dennison, H. (1937). The need for development of political science engineering. In L. Gulick & L. Urwick (Eds.), Papers on the science of administration. New York: Institute of Public Administration.
11.
Dilulio, J. J. Jr. (1989). Recovering the public management variable: Lessons from schools, prisons, and armies. Public Administration Review, 49, 127-133.
12.
Gore, A. (1993). From red tape to results: Creating a government that works better and costs less. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
13.
Gulick, L. (1937). Notes on the theory of organization. In Luther Gulick & L. Urwick (Eds.), Papers on the science of administration. New York: Institute of Public Administration.
14.
Gulick, L., & Urwick, L. (Eds.). (1937). Papers on the science of administration. New York: Institute of Public Administration.
15.
Hayek, F. A. (1948). Individualism and economic order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Hayek, F. A. (1967). Studies in philosophy, politics, and economics. London: Roudledge & Kegan Paul.
17.
Hayek, F. A. (1973). Law, legislation, and liberty: Vol. 1. Rules and order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
Hayek, F. A. (1979). The counter-revolution of science: Studies on the abuse of reason. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Press.
19.
Hayek, F. A. (1988). The fatal conceit: The errors of socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Knight, F. H. (1982). Freedom and reform: Essays in economics and social philosophy. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Press.
21.
Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 29, 79-88.
22.
Lindblom, C. E. (1990). Inquiry and change: The troubled attempts to understand and shape society. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23.
Maletz, D. J. (1991). The place of constitutionalism in the education of public administrators. Administration and Society, 23, 374-394.
24.
McCloskey, D. N. (1990). If you're so smart: The narrative of economic expertise. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
25.
Mill, J. S. (1988). The logic of the moral sciences. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.
26.
Mitchell, T. R., & Scott, W. G. (1987). Leadership failures, the distrusting public, and prospects of the administrative state. Public Administration Review, 47, 445-452.
27.
Oakeshott, M. (1975). On human conduct. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
28.
Oakeshott, M. (1991). Rationalism in politics and other essays. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Press.
29.
Oakeshott, M. (1993). Morality and politics in modern Europe: The Harvard lectures. New Haven, CT: Harvard University Press.
30.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1993). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. New York: Penguin.
31.
Perry, J. L. (Ed.). (1989). Handbook of public administration. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
32.
Polanyi, M. (1941). The growth of thought in society. Economica, 8, 428-456.
33.
Reich, R. (Ed.). (1988). The power of public ideas. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
34.
Rohr, J. A. (1986). To run a constitution. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
35.
Shangraw, R. F. Jr., & Crow, M. M. (1989). Public administration as a design science. Public Administration Review, 49, 153-158.
36.
Simon, H. M. (1957). Administrative behavior (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
37.
Spicer, M. W. (1995). The founders, the constitution, and public administration: A conflict in world views. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
38.
Urwick, L. (1937). Organization as a technical problem. In L. Gulick & L. Urwick (Eds.), Papers on the science of administration. New York: Institute of Public Administration.
39.
Waldo, D. (1984). The administrative state. New York: Holmes & Meier.
40.
Wills, G. (Ed.). (1982). The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. New York: Bantam.
41.
Wilson, W. (1887). The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2, 197-222.
