The ethical orientations of senior civil servants in Hong Kong are examined using survey datafrom a sample of279 officials involved in advanced training and university professional training programs. These public officials were found to identify strongly with the classical ideal constituted by administrative neutrality, loyalty to hierarchy, and respect for organizational rules. However, indications of more assertive personal values independent of the organization were discovered. This erosion of neutrality is characterized by espousal of liberal values such as fairness, equality, justice, honesty, integrity, human dignity, and individual freedom. The extent to which these values reflect a latent professional ethic as an autonomous basis for moral judgment and conduct remains unclear Although at present these administrators experience little incongruence between the rules and norms of the organization and their liberal values, whenever presented with a hypothetical conflict they tend to optfor loyalty to the bureaucratic hierarchy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bailey, S. K. (1965). Ethics and the public service. In R. C. Martin (Ed.), Public administration and democracy (pp. 283-298). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
2.
Baumhart, H. (1961). How ethical are businessmen?Harvard Business Review, 39, 6-9.
3.
Bowman, J. S. (Ed.). (1991). Ethicalfrontiers in public management: Seeking new strategies for resolving ethical dilemmas. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4.
Brenner, S. , & Mollander, E. (1977). Is the ethics of business changing?Harvard Business Review, 55, 57-63.
5.
Chapman, R. A. (1988). Ethics in the British civil service. London: Routledge.
6.
Cheek-Milby, K. (1989). The civil servant as politician: The role of the official member of the Legislative Council. In K. Cheek-Milby & M. Mushkat (Eds.), Hong Kong: The challenge of transformation (pp. 256-291). Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong, Centre of Asian Studies.
7.
Clark, J. (1965). A preliminary investigation of religion and the moral standards ofAmerican businessmen. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
8.
Cooper, T. L. (1990). The responsible administrator: An approach to ethics for the administrative role (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9.
Cooper, T. L. (1991). An ethic of citizenship for public administration. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10.
Cooper, T. L. , & Lui, T. T. (1990). Democracy and the administrative state: The case of Hong Kong. Public Administration Review, 50, 332-344.
11.
Cooper, T. L. , & Wright, N. D. (Eds.). (1992). Exemplary public administrators: Character and leadership in government. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12.
deLeon, L. (1993). As plain as 1, 2, 3.. and 4: Ethics and organization structure. Administration & Society, 25, 293-316.
13.
Denhardt, K. G. (1988). The ethics of public service: Resolving moral dilemmas in public organizations. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
14.
Finer, H. (1936). Better government personnel. Political Science Quarterly, 51, 569-599.
15.
Frederickson, H. G. , & Hart, D. K. (1985). The public service and the patriotism of benevolence. Public Administration Review, 45, 547-553.
16.
Friedrich, C. J. (1935). Responsible government service under the American constitution. Monograph No. 7 in C. J. Friedrich, W. C. Beyer, S. D. Spero, J. F. Miller, & G. A. Graham (Eds.), Problems of the American public service. New York: McGraw-Hill.
17.
Goodnow, F. J. (1900). Politics and administration: A study in government. New York: Russell & Russell.
18.
Gortner, H. (1991). Ethics for public managers. New York: Praeger.
19.
Hejka-Ekins, A. (1988). Teaching ethics in public administration. Public Administration Review, 48, 885-891.
20.
Kernaghan, K. , & Dwivedi, O. P. (Eds.). (1983). Ethics in the public service: Comparative perspectives. Brussels, Belgium: International Institute of Administrative Sciences.
21.
Lau, S.-K. (1984). Society and politics in Hong Kong. Hong Kong, China: Chinese University Press.
22.
Lewis, C. W. (1991). The ethics challenge in public service. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23.
Leys, W. A. (1943). Ethics and administrative discretion. Public Administration Review, 3, 10-23.
24.
Lui, T. T. (1988). Changing civil servants' values. In I. Scott & J. P. Bums (Eds.), The Hong Kong civil service and its future (pp. 131-166). Hong Kong, China: Oxford University Press.
25.
Miners, N. (1991). The government and politics of Hong Kong (5th ed.). Hong Kong, China: Oxford University Press.
26.
Rohr, J. A. (1976). The study of ethics in the p.a. curriculum. Public Administration Review, 36,398-406.
27.
Rohr, J. A. (1989). Ethics for bureaucrats: An essay on law and values (2nd ed.). New York: Dekker.
28.
Rohr, J. A. (1990). Ethics in public administration: A state-of-the-discipline report. In N. B. Lynn & A. Wildavsky (Eds.), Public administration: The state of the discipline (pp. 97-123). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
29.
Schein, E. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30.
Schmidt, W. , & Posner, B. (1983). Managerial values in perspective. New York: American Management Association.
31.
Schmidt, W. , & Posner, B. (1986). Values and expectations of federal service executives. Public Administration Review, 46, 447-454.
32.
Scott, I. , & Bums, J. P. (Eds.). (1984). The Hong Kong civil service: Personnel policies and practices. Hong Kong, China: Oxford University Press.
33.
Taylor, F. W. (1987). The principles of scientific management (Bulletin of the Taylor Society). In J. M. Shafritz & J. S. Ott (Eds.), Classics of organization theory (2nd ed., pp. 66-81). Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press. (Original work published 1916)
34.
Thompson, D. F. (1985). The possibility of administrative ethics. Public Administration Review, 45, 555-561.
35.
Ventriss, C. (1991). Reconstructing government ethics: A public philosophy of civic virtue. In J. S. Bowman (Ed.), Ethical frontiers in public management (pp. 114-134). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
36.
Wakefield, S. (1976). Ethics and the public service: A case for individual responsibility. Public Administration Review, 36, 661-666.
37.
Warwick, D. P. (1981). The ethics of administrative discretion. In J. L. Fleishman, L. Liebman, & M. H. Moore (Eds.), Public duties: The moral obligations of government officials (pp. 93-127). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
Weber, M. (1991). Politics as a vocation. In H. H. Gerth & C. W. Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in sociology (pp. 77-128). London: Routledge.
39.
Wilson, W. (1887). The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2, 197-220.
