This article seeks to better identify Edmund Burke's views on human reason and human nature, tradition, representation, and law, and the implications of these views for public administration. Parallels between Burke's thought and that of the Founders (Founding Fathers) are examined. Also, the reasons for neglect of Burke's thought by public administration writers are discussed. Drawing on Burke's thought, the article presents an argument for the exercise of significant discretion by public administrators but argues that this discretion should be limited by administrative rules and procedures and by a set of ethics that emphasizes prudence and tradition.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, G. B. , Bowerman, P. V., Dolbeare, K. M., & Stivers, C. (1990). Joining purpose to practice: A democratic identity for the public service. In H. D. Kass & B. L. Catron (Eds.), Images and identities in public administration (pp. 219-241). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Burke, E. (1901). The writings and speeches of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke (12 Vols., Beaconsfield Ed.). Boston: Little, Brown. (Earliest volume published 1756)
3.
Burke, E. (1967). The correspondence of Edmund Burke (Vol. VI, T. W. Copeland, Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1789)
4.
Burke, E. (1957). A notebook of Edmund Burke (H.V.F. Somerset, Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1756)
5.
Cook, B. J. (1992). The representative function of bureaucracy: Public administration in constitutive perspective. Administration & Society, 23, 403-429.
6.
Davis, K. C. (1969). Discretionary justice. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
7.
Denhardt, R. B. (1981). In the shadow of organization. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
8.
Finer, H. (1941). Administrative responsibility in democratic government. Public Administration Review, 1, 335-350.
9.
Frederickson, G. H. (1971). Toward a new public administration. In F. Marini (Ed.), Toward a new public administration: The Minnowbrook perspective (pp. 309-331). Scranton, NY: Chandler.
10.
Friedrich, C. J. (1940). Public policy and the nature of administrative responsibility. In C. J. Friedrich (Ed.), Public policy (pp. 3-24). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
11.
Friedrich, C. J. (1972). Tradition and authority. New York: Praeger.
12.
From red tape to results: creating a government that works better and costs less. (1993). National Performance Review. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
13.
Gaus, J. M. (1947). Reflections on public administration. University: University of Alabama Press.
14.
Haque, A. (1994). Edmund Burke: The limits of reason in public administration theory. Unpublished dissertation, Cleveland State University.
15.
Jefferson, T. (1984). Writings. New York: Library of America.
16.
Ketcham, R. (Ed.). (1986). The Anti-Federalist papers and the constitutional convention debates. New York: Mentor.
17.
Kirk, R. (1990). The conservative constitution. Washington, DC: Regnery Gateway.
18.
Lindblom, C. E. (1959). Science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 29, 79-88.
19.
Osborne, D. , & Gaebler, T. (1993). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. New York: Penguin.
20.
Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The concept of representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
21.
Rohr, J. A. (1986). To run a constitution: The legitimacy of the administrative state. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
22.
Rohr, J. A. (1993). Toward amore perfect union. PublicAdministration Review, 53, 246-249.
23.
Selznick, P. (1993). The moral commonwealth: Social theory and the promise of community. Berkeley: University of California Press.
24.
Spicer, M. W. (1995). The Founders, the constitution, and public administration: A conflict in wordviews. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
25.
Stillman, R. J. (1989). Ostrom on the Federalist reconsidered. PublicAdministration Review, 49, 82-84.
26.
Stillman, R. J. (1991). Preface to public administration. New York: St. Martin's.
27.
Terry, L. D. (1990). Leadership in the administrative state: The concept of administrative conservatorship. Administration & Society, 21, 395-412.
28.
Thompson, V. (1975). Without sympathy or enthusiasm: The problem of administrative compassion. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
29.
Waldo, D. (1984). The administrative state (2nd ed.). New York: Holmes & Meier.
30.
Wildavsky, A. (1964). The politics of the budgetary process. Boston: Little, Brown.
31.
Wildavsky, A. (1987). Speaking truth to power: The art and craft of policy analysis. New Brunswick: Transaction.
32.
Wills, G. (Ed.). (1982). The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay. New York: Bantam.
33.
Wilson, W. (1889). The state: Elements of historical and practical problems. Boston: D. C. Heath.
34.
Wilson, W. (1896). Mere literature and other essays. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
35.
Wilson, W. (1956). Congressional government. Cleveland: Meridian.
