The transformation of countries in Eastern Europe involves sweeping changes in the scope and roles of national and local governments. The reallocation of economic activities between the public and private sectors and decentralization from national to local governments are complex and difficult processes. This article explores the role of local governments in privatizing the social infrastructure assets of state-owned enterprises, especially housing complexes. Two case studies are used to compare approaches used by local governments to assume responsibility for these facilities. The Polish experience suggests that nations undertaking privatization of social assets should give greater consideration to the role of local governments in the process. The local governments are more flexible in their approach than the central government and can tailor the transformation to local conditions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aziewicz, T. (Ed.). (1993). A report on the transformation of the public utility sector, May-August, 1992. Warsaw: Gdansk Institute for Market Economics, Cooperation Fund, Restructuring and Privatization of Municipal Enterprises Programme.
2.
Bell, M. E. (1991, August). Centralization versus decentralization: The case of financing autonomous local governments in Poland. Paper presented at the 47th congress of the International Institute of Public Finance, Leningrad.
3.
Butler, E. (1990). The promise of privatization. In Privitisation: Aims and means (pp. 75-83). Krakow: Miroslaw Dzielski Institute of Industry and Commerce.
4.
City Council of Lublin . (1993, February 11). On the procedure for establishing the budgeting of the City of Lublin and amending it (Resolution No. XL/381/93).
5.
Dabrowski, M. (1994, January 12). 1994 budget: Stalling the reforms. Rzeczpospolita, p. 9-9.
6.
Deloitte & Touche. (1992a). A guidebook to privatizing social assets (Draft prepared for the United States Agency for International Development). Warsaw: Author.
7.
Deloitte & Touche. (1992b). Privatizing social assets (Prepared for the United States Agency for International Development). Warsaw: Author.
8.
Delouvrier, M. (1990). Privitisation in East European countries: Some practical aspects. In Privitisation: Aims and means (pp. 105-113). Krakow: Miroslaw Dzielski Institute of industry and Commerce.
9.
Dobek, M. M. (1993). The political logic of privatization. Westport, CT: Praeger.
10.
Gilowska, Z. (1992). The basic financial problems of Polish communes. Poznan: National Institute of Self-Government Researches.
Greytak, D. , & Pijey, J. (1994, May). Development of a municipal credit program to finance infrastructure investments in Poland (Report prepared for the Office of Housing and Urban Programs, U.S. Agency for International Development). Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
14.
Grzegorzewski, Z. (1992, December 6). Bilans prywatyzacji [The balance of privatization]. Zycie Gospodarcze, p. 17-17.
15.
Kanet, R. E. , & Souders, B. V. (1993). Democratization and local government in Poland. In-Depth, 3, 91-113.
16.
Kosek-Wojnar, M. (1992). Local self-government and the financial crisis of the state. Krakow: Krakow Academy of Economics.
17.
Kubik, J. (1991, May 31). Local government: The basic laws and most common problems. Radio Free Europe (RFERL-L) [on-line newsletter].
18.
Pacek, A. C. (1994). Macroeconomic conditions and electoral politics in East Central Europe. American Journal of Political Science, 38(3), 723-744.
19.
PADCO, Inc. (1991, October). Poland: Overview of local government's role in facilitating private development of housing. Washington, DC: Office of Housing and Urban Programs, U.S. Agency for International Development.
20.
21.
Regulska, J. (1992, March). Local government reform in Central and Eastern Europe: Challenges and barriers. Conference paper presented at "From Centralism to Local Democracy: An International Workshop on Local Government Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe,"Krakow.
22.
Regulski, J. , & Kocan, W. (1994). From communism towards democracy: Local government reform in Poland. In R. J. Bennett (Ed.), Local government and market decentralization: Experiences in industrialized, developing, and former Eastern Bloc countries. New York: United Nations University Press.
23.
Rudzka-Lorenz, C. (1993). Majatkowe Ifinansowe podstawy [Foundations of ownership and finance]. Warsaw: Foundation in Support of Local Democracy.
24.
Spencer, K. M. (1989). Local government and the housing reform. In J. Stewart & G. Stoker (Eds.), The future of local government (pp. 78-100). London: Macmillan.
25.
Styczek, D. (1994, August 21). Strengthening market economy top priority: Interview with Elzbieta Chojna-Duch, undersecretary of state at the Ministry of Finance. Warsaw Voice, p. B3-B3.
26.
Swianiewicz, P. (1992). The Polish experience of local democracy: Is progress being made?Policy and Politics, 20(2), 87-98.
27.
Taebel, D. , & Kisiel, W. (1994). Local government in an emerging democracy: Problems of Polish mayors. State and Local Government Review, 26(1), 54-62.
28.
Thurmaier, K. , & Kroh, R. (1993, November). Improving the capacity to budget in Lublin, Poland. Washington, DC: Office of Housing and Urban Programs, U.S. Agency for International Development.
29.
Wieczorkowska, A. (1993a, March 7). Miedzy centrum a gmina [Relations between the center and the county]. Zycie Gospodarcze, p. 6-6.
30.
Wieczorkowska, A. (1993b, May 16). Reforma kuleszy [Kulesza's reform] (Interview with Michal Kulesza, minister for public administration reform). Zycie Gospodarcze, p. 3-3.
