Women are severely underrepresented in the Israeli senior civil service. This article explores the barriers that impede women 's advancement to top administrative positions by comparing those who achieved senior ranks to a sample of two control groups: male senior officials and middle-rank female officials. Four explanations are offered: (a) human capital, (b) attitudes and views, (c) organizational characteristics and values, and (d) functional attributes. Data show that senior women are differentfrom senior men in their higher status, in their lower sense of equity, and in their domestic chores. Senior women are distinctfrom middle-rank women in their social, women's, and occupational networking and in their internal domestic chores. A discriminate analysis has shown the importance of domestic chores in the male-female variation and the importance of status, social, occupational, and women networking within the intrafemale variation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alvarez, R. , & Lutterman, K. G. (1979). Discrimination in organizations: Using social indicators to manage social change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2.
Azmon, Y. , & Izraeli, D. N. (1993). Women in Israel. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
3.
Bayes, J. H. (1991). Women and public administration: A comparative perspective-Conclusions. Women and Politics, 11, 111-132.
4.
Bayes, J. H. , & Col, J. M. (1991). Women in public administration: A comparative perspective-Introduction. Women and Politics, 11, 1-12.
5.
Bendix, R. (1949). Higher civil servants in American society. Boulder: University of Colorado Press.
6.
Benedict, K. M. (1980). When women succeed: Organizational settings and the structure of careers. Dissertation Abstracts International, 41, 799A-799A. (University Microfilms No. 79-16471)
7.
Bielby, W. T. (1992). Commitment to family and work. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 281-302.
8.
Black, N. (1980). Feminism and integration: The European communities' surveys "European Men and Women."Journal of European Integration, 4, 83-108.
9.
Boneparth, E. (1982). Women, power and policy. New York: Pergamon.
10.
Borcher, R. B. (1982). Does tradition affect affirmative action results? How Pennsylvania achieved changes at the middle management level. Public Administration Forum, 42, 475-478.
11.
Brereton, T. F. (1977). The problems of race and sex in public agency staffs. Public Administration Review, 37,604-607.
12.
Civil Service Authority . (1989). Women's status in the civil service. Jerusalem: Author.
13.
Civil Service Commission . (1993). Annual report forty-three. Jerusalem: Ministry of Finance. (Hebrew)
14.
Crompton, R. , & Le Feuvre, N. (1992). Gender and bureaucracy: Women in finance in Britain and France. In M. Savage & A. Witz (Eds.), Gender and bureaucracy (pp. 94-123). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
15.
Dogan, M. (1975). The political power of the Western Europe Mandarins: Introduction. In M. Dogan (Ed.), The Mandarins of Western Europe: The political role of the top civil servants (pp. 3-24). New York: Halstead.
16.
Dreher, G. F. , & Ash, R. A. (1990). A comparative study of mentoring among men and women in managerial, professional and technical positions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 539-546.
17.
Efroni, L. (1990). Promotions and salaries of women in public services in Israel. Jerusalem: Advisor on the Status of Women. (Hebrew)
18.
Finnie, E. G. (1982). Women in management: The missing regiment. Work and People, 8, 32-35.
19.
Franzway, S. , Court, D., & Connell, R. W. (1989). Staking a claim: Feminism, bureaucracy and the state. Sydney, Australia: Allen and Unwin.
20.
Gutek, B. A. , & Larwood, I. (Eds.). (1987). Women's career development. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21.
Hale, M. M. (1992). Mentoring. In M. E. Guy (Ed.), Women and men of the states (pp. 89-108). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharp.
22.
Hale, M. M. , & Kelly, R. M. (Eds.). (1989). Gender, bureaucracy, and democracy: Careers and equal opportunity in the public sector. New York: Greenwood.
23.
Hazleton, L. (1977). Israeli women: The reality behind the myths. New York: Simon & Schuster.
24.
Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift. New York: Avon Books.
25.
Hopkins, A. H. (1980). Perceptions of employment discrimination in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 40, 131-137.
26.
Johnson, C. M. , & Duerst-Lahti, G. (1992). Public work, private lives. In M. E. Guy (Ed.), Women and men of the states (pp. 125-156). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
27.
Kanter, R. M. , & Stein, A. (Eds.). (1979). Life in organizations. New York: Basic Books.
28.
Katz, R. , & Peres, Y (1986). The sociology of the family in Israel: An outline of its development from the 1950s to the 1980s. European Sociological Review, 2, 148-159.
29.
Katzenstein, M. F (1987). Comparing the feminist movements of the United States and Western Europe: An overview. In M. F. Katzenstein & C. McClurg Mueller (Eds.), The women's movements of the United States and Western Europe: Consciousness, political opportunity and public policy (pp. 3-20). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
30.
Kelly, R. M. , & Boutilier, M. (1978). The making ofpolitical women: A study of socialization and role conflict. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
31.
Kelly, R. M. , Guy, M. E., Bayes, J., & Johnson, C. (1991). Public managers in the states: A comparison of career advancement by sex. Public Administration Review, 51, 402-412.
32.
Kranz, H. (1976). The participatory bureaucracy: Women and minorities in a more representative public service. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
33.
Krislov, S. (1974). Representative bureaucracy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
34.
Krislov, S. , & Rosenblum, D. (1981). Representative bureaucracy and the American political system. New York: Praeger.
35.
Levi, M. , & Edwards, M. (1990). The dilemma of femocratic reform. In M. F Katzenstein & H. Skjeie (Eds.), Going public: National histories of women's enfranchisement and women ' participation within state institutions (pp. 141-172). Oslo, Norway: Institute for Social Research.
36.
Lewis, G. B. (1987). Changing patterns of sexual discrimination in federal employment. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 7, 1-13.
37.
Leyenaar, M. (1991). Women in public administration in the Netherlands. Women and Politics, 11, 41-54.
38.
MacKinnon, C. A. (1979). Sexual harassment of working women: A case of sex discrimination. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
39.
Mannheim, B. (1993). Gender and the effects of demographics, status, and work values on work centrality. Work and Occupations, 20, 3-22.
40.
Mannheim, B. , & Schiffrin, M. (1984). Family structure, job characteristics, rewards and strains as related to work role centrality of employed and self-employed professional women with children. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 5, 83-101.
41.
Marsden, P. V. , Kalleberg, A. L., & Cook, C. R. (1993). Gender differences in organizational commitment. Work and Occupations, 20, 368-390.
42.
Mosher, F. (1968). Democracy and the public service. New York: New York University Press.
43.
Naff, K. C. (1994). Through the glass ceiling: Prospects for the advancement of women in the federal civil service. Public Administration Review, 54, 507-514.
44.
Orr, E. L. (1991). Policies for the family-friendly workplace. The Bureaucrat, 20, 5-8.
45.
Osipow, S. H. (1983). Theories of career development (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
46.
Peters, B. G. (1974). The politics of bureaucracy. New York: Longman.
47.
Pitkin, H. (1967). The concept of representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
48.
Pittman. J. F. , & Orthner, D. K. (1988). Gender differences in the prediction of job commitment. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 3, 227-248.
49.
Presley, S. , Weaver, J., & Weaver, B. (1986). Traditional and nontraditional Mormon women: Political attitudes and socialization. Women and Politics, 5, 51-77.
50.
Rehfuss, J. A. (1986). A representative bureaucracy? Women and minority executives in California career service. Public Administration, 46, 454-460.
51.
Safir, M. (1991). Religion, tradition and public policy give family first priority. In B. Swirski & M. Safir (Eds.), Calling the equality bluff: Women in Israel (pp. 57-65). New York: Pergamon.
52.
Sawer, M. (1989). Sisters in suits: Women and public policy in Australia. Sydney, Australia: Unwin Hyman.
53.
Schneider, P.A.D. (1993). Search for a glass ceiling. The Public Manager, 22, 38-38.
54.
Steinberg, R. J. , Haignere, L., & Chertos, C. (1990). Managerial promotion in the public sector: The impact of eligibility requirements on women and minorities. Work and Occupations, 17, 284-301.
55.
Stewart, D. W. (1976). Women in top jobs: An opportunity for federal leadership. Public Administration Review, 36, 357-364.
56.
Subermanian, V. (1967). Representative bureaucracy: A reassessment. American Political Science Review, 61, 1010-1019.
57.
Van Fleet, D. D. , & Saurage, J. G. (1984). Recent research on women in management. Akron Business and Economic Review, 15, 15-24.
58.
Viteritty, J. P. (1979). Bureaucracy and social justice. New York: Kennikat.
59.
Waldo, D. (1986). Bureaucracy and democracy: Reconciling the irreconcilable? In F. S. Lane (Ed.), Current issues in public administration (pp. 445-469). New York: St. Martin's.
60.
Watson, S. (Ed). (1989). Playing the state. London: Verso Books.
61.
Wilcox, C. (1991). The causes and consequences of feminist consciousness among Western European women. Comparative Political Studies, 23, 519-545.
