Counterbureaucracies differfrom other bureaucracies in their goals, resources, discretion, and culture. This article develops several theoretical propositions concerning counterbureaucracies and then considers how they actually behave. Despite negative goals and a self-reliant culture, counterbureaucracies have generally flourished in recent years. Public relations, a service orientation, and professionalism have helped them to generate vital political support.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aberbach, J. (1990). Keeping a watchful eye: The politics of congressional oversight. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
2.
Administration on Aging, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services . (1983). National summary of state ombudsman reports for U.S. FY 1982. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
3.
Anderson, S. (1973). Comparing classical and executive ombudsmen. In A. Wyner (Ed.), Executive ombudsmen in the U.S. (pp. 305-315). Berkeley: Institute of Governmental Studies.
4.
Barker, A. (1993). Patterns of decision advice processes. In B. G. Peters & A. Barker (Eds.), Advising European governments (pp. 20-36). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
5.
Boyer, J. , & Langbein, L. (1991). Factors influencing the use of health evaluation research in Congress. Evaluation Review, 15, 507-532.
6.
Cooper, J. , & West, W. (1988). Presidential power and Republican government: The theory and practice of OMB review of agency rules. Journal of Politics, 50, 864-895.
7.
Durant, R. (1985). When government regulates itself. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
8.
Easton, D. (1965). A frameworkfor political analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9.
Gellhorn, W. (1966). Ombudsmen and others: Citizens'protectors in nine countries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
Gormley, W., Jr. (1983). The politics of public utility regulation. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
11.
Gormley, W., Jr. (1986). The representation revolution: Reforming state regulation through representation. Administration and Society, 18, 179-196.
12.
Gormley, W., Jr. (1989). Taming the bureaucracy: Muscles, prayers, and other strategies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
Hill, L. (1976). The model ombudsman: Institutionalizing New Zealand's democratic experiment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
Kaiser, F. (1993, September 2). Full law enforcementpowersfor inspectors general: Causes and conflicts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
15.
Kettl, D. (1993). Sharing power: Public governance and private markets. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
16.
Kleinmnn, S. (1993). The reciprocal relationship of workplace culture and review. In R. Spilka (Ed.), Writing in the workplace. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
17.
Konigsberg, E. (1993, April 5). Waste watchers. New Republic, pp. 12-14.
18.
Lancaster, J. (1992, October 5). Pentagon's acting IG stands by his convictions. Washington Post, p. 17-17.
19.
Light, P. (1993). Monitoring government: Inspectors general and the search for accountability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
20.
Long, N. (1949). Power and administration. Public Administration Review, 9, 257-264.
21.
Mangano, M. (1990). Evaluation within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 48, 25-36.
22.
Moe, T. (1989). The politics of bureaucratic structure. In J. Chubb & P. Peterson (Eds.), Can the government govern? (pp. 267-329). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
23.
Mohr, L. (1973). The concept of organizational goal. American Political Science Review, 67,470-481.
24.
Monk, A. , Kaye, L., & Litwin, H. (1982). National comparative analysis of long-term care programs for the aged. New York: Brookdale Institute on Aging and Adult Human Developmentand Columbia University School of Social Work.
25.
Moore, J. (1973). Honolulu's Office of Information and Complaint. In A. Wyner (Ed.), Executive ombudsmen in the U.S. (pp. 45-69). Berkeley, CA: Institute of Governmental Studies.
26.
Mosher, F (1979). The GAO: The questforaccountability inAmerican government. Boulder, CO: Westview.
27.
National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates . (1993). 1993 directory. Washington, DC: Author.
28.
Neustadt, R. (1960). Presidential power: The politics of leadership. New York: John Wiley.
29.
Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
Pierce, R. , Shapiro, S., & Verkuil, P. (1985). Administrative law and process. Mineola, NY: Foundation Press.
31.
Piven, F. F. , & Cloward, R. (1977). Poor people's movements: Why they succeed, how they fail. New York: Pantheon.
32.
Portney, P. (1984). Will EO 12291 improve environmental policy making? In V. Kerry Smith (Ed.), Environmental policy under Reagan 's Executive Order. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
33.
Robinson, W. (1989). Policy analysis for Congress: Lengthening the time horizon. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 8(1), 1-9.
34.
Rosenthal, A. (1990). Governors and legislatures: Contending powers. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
35.
Rourke, F (1978). Variations in agency power. In F Rourke (Ed.), Bureaucratic power in national politics (3rd ed., pp. 224-250). Boston: Little, Brown.
36.
Seidman, H. (1970). Politics, position, and power: The dynamics offederal organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
Simon, H. (1976). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
38.
Trask, R. (1991). GAO history, 1921-1991. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.
39.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector General . (1993). Review of health and safety standards at child care facilities in Wisconsin. Washington, DC: Author.
40.
U.S. General Accounting Office . (1992). The OlderAmericans Act: Access to and utilization of the ombudsman program. Washington, DC: Author.
41.
U.S. Office of Management and Budget . (1982). Budget of the U.S. government, fiscal year 1983. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
42.
U.S. Office of Management and Budget . (1993). Budget of the U.S. government, fiscal year 1994. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
43.
Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books.
44.
Wilson, J. Q. , & Rachal, P. (1977). Can the government regulate itself?Public Interest, 46, 3-14.
45.
Wyner, A. (1973). Executive ombudsmen and criticisms of contemporary American public bureaucracy. In A. Wyner (Ed.), Executive ombudsmen in the U.S. (pp. 1-15). Berkeley, CA: Institute of Governmental Studies.
