Public administration has, during recent decades, been widely held to be a study in disarray, without an integrating theory, neither a discipline nor a component of a discipline. The orthodox solution is to affirm that it is an interdisciplinary study, requiring no central theory. 7The study should not and cannot be founded in a single discipline. This essay examines and challenges the case for public administration as an interdisciplinary study. It suggests politics as the discourse in which public administration most appropriately finds its place.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allison, G. T., Jr. (1990). Public and private management: Are they fundamentally alike in all unimportant respects? In F. S. Lane (Ed.), Current issues in public administration (4th ed., pp. 16-33). New York: St. Martin.
2.
Appleby, P. H. (1945). Big democracy. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
3.
Appleby, P. H. (1949). Policy and administration. University: University of Alabama Press.
4.
Bacharach, S. B. , & Lawler, E. J. (1980). Power and politics in organizations: The social psychology of conflict, coalitions, and bargaining. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
Baldwin, J. N. (1988). Comparisons of perceived effectiveness of MPA program administered under different institutional arrangements. Public Administration Review, 48, 876-884.
6.
Barzelay, M. (1992). Breaking through bureaucracy: A new vision for managing in government. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7.
Behn, R. D. (1980). Policy analysis and public management: What should Jones do? In G. S. Birkhead & J. D. Carroll (Eds.), Education for public service 1980 (pp. 17-25). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, Maxwell School.
8.
Birkhead, G. S. , & Carroll, J. D. (1980). Foreword. In G. S. Birkhead & J. D. Carroll (Eds.), Education for public service 1980 (pp. 5-11). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, Maxwell School.
9.
Brown, B. , & Stilman, R. J., II. (1986). A search for public administration: The ideas and career of Dwight Waldo. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
10.
Budziszewski, J. (1992). True tolerance: Liberalism and the necessity of judgment. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
11.
Catron, B. L. , & Hammond, B. R. (1990). Epilogue: Reflections on practical wisdom-enacting images and developing identity. In H. D. Kass & B. L. Catron (Eds.), Images and identities in public administration (pp. 241-251). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12.
Chandler, A. D., Jr. (1977). The visible hand: The managerial revolution in American business. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
13.
Cleary, R. E. (1990). What do public administration masters programs look like? Do they do what is needed?Public Administration Review, 50, 663-673.
14.
Cleveland, H. (1979). The get-it-all-together profession. Public Administration Review, 39, 306-309.
15.
Cleveland, H. (1988). Theses of a new reformation: The social fallout of science 300 years after Newton. Public Administration Review, 48, 681-686.
16.
Conant, J. K. (1992). Enrollment trends in schools of public affairs and administration: A search for winners and losers. Public Administration Review, 52, 288-297.
17.
Cooper, T. L. (1990). The responsible administrator: An approach to ethics for the administrative role (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18.
Cooper, W. W. , Leavitt, H. J., & Shelly, M. W., II. (1964). Changing patterns of organization research. In W. W. Cooper, H. J. Leavitt, & M. W. Shelly, II (Eds.), New perspectives in organization research (pp. 1-23). New York: Wiley.
19.
Crenson, M. A. (1975). The federal machine: Beginnings of bureaucracy in Jacksonian America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
20.
Crick, B. (1959). The American science of politics: Its origins and conditions. Berkeley: University of California Press.
21.
Denhardt, R. B. (1984). Theories of public organization. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Ellwood, J. W. (1981, September). Graduate education for non-academic careers in the public policy schools: A look at the competition. Paper prepared for delivery at the 1981 annual meetings of the American Political Science Association, New York.
24.
Featherman, D. L. (1991). Presidential items. Items, 45(1), 4-5.
25.
Fesler, J. W. (1975). Public administration and the social sciences: 1946 to 1960. In F. C. Mosher (Ed.), American public administration: Past, present, future (pp. 97-141). University: University of Alabama Press.
26.
Flathman, R. E. (1966). The public interest: An essay concerning the normative discourse of politics. New York: Wiley.
27.
Frederickson, H. G. (1980). New public administration. University: University of Alabama Press.
28.
Frederickson, H. G. (1989). Minnowbrook II: Changing epochs of public administration. Public Administration Review, 49, 95-100.
29.
Fry, B. R. (1989). Mastering public administration: From Max Weber to Dwight Waldo. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
30.
Gillespie, R. (1991). Manufacturing knowledge: A history of the Hawthorne experiments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Golembiewski, R. T. (1989). Anomie, resurgence, and opportunity: Reflections on the current state of the public service. Public Administration Review, 49, 287-290.
32.
Goodsell, C. T. (1990). Public administration and the public interest. In G. L. Wamsleyet al. (Eds.), Refounding public administration (pp. 96-113). Newbury Parks CA: Sage.
33.
Gortner, H. F. , Mahler, J., & Nicholson, J. B. (1987). Organization theory: A public perspective. Chicago: Dorsey.
34.
Haber, S. (1964). Efficiency and uplift: Scientific management in the progressive era, 1890-1920. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
Hart, D. K. , & Wasden, C. D. (1990). "Two roads diverged in a yellow wood": Public administration, the management orthodoxy, and civic humanism. International Journal of Public Administration, 13, 747-775.
36.
Henry, N. (1975). Paradigms of public administration. Public Administration Review, 35, 378-386.
37.
Herring, E. P. (1936). Public administration and the public interest. New York: McGraw-Hill.
38.
Herson, L.J.R. (1957). The lost world of municipal government. American Political Science Review, 51, 330-345.
39.
Kass, H. D. , & Catron, B. L. (Eds.). (1990). Images and identities in public administration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
40.
Kirwan, K. A. (1977). The crisis of identity in the study of public administration: Woodrow Wilson. Polity, 9, 321-343.
41.
Knight, M. (1975, October 1). Yale sets up school of administration with dual purpose. New York Times, pp. 1, 53.
42.
Kraemer, K. L. , & Perry, J. L. (1980). Camelot revisited: Public administration in a generic school. In G. S. Birkhead & J. D. Carroll (Eds.), Education for public service 1980 (pp. 87-102). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, Maxwell School.
43.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed., enlarged, International Encyclopaedia of Unified Science). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44.
LaPorte, T. R. (1971). The recovery of relevance in the study of public organization. In F. Marini (Ed.), Toward a new public administration: The Minnowbrook perspective (pp. 17-48). Scranton, PA: Chandler.
45.
Laverty, E. B. , & Sorg, J. D. (1980). Integrating training about EDP into MPA curricula. In G. S. Birkhead & J. D. Carroll (Eds.), Education for public service 1980 (pp. 67-78). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, Maxwell School.
46.
Levine, C. H. (1986). The federal government in the year 2000: Administrative legacies of the Reagan years. Public Administration Review, 46, 195-206.
47.
Long, N. E. (1962). The polity. Chicago: Rand McNally.
48.
Long, N. E. (1965). Politicians for hireāThe dilemma of education and the task of research. Public Administration Review, 25, 115-120.
49.
Lueck, T. J. (1986, July 7). A different emphasis at Yale. New York Times, pp. D1, D6.
50.
McCurdy, H. E. (1978). Selecting and training public managers: Business skills versus public administration. Public Administration Review, 38, 571-578.
51.
Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organization. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
52.
Mosher, F. C. (1980). The changing responsibilities and tactics of the federal government. Public Administration Review, 40, 541-548.
53.
Mosher, F. C. (1982). Democracy and the public service (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
54.
Murray, M. A. (1975). Comparing public and private management: An exploratory essay. Public Administration Review, 35, 364-371.
55.
National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration . (1974). Guidelines and standards for professional masters degree programs in public affairs/public administration. Washington, DC: Author.
56.
National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration . (1987). Task force report on the future of NASPAA. Washington, DC: Author.
57.
National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration . (1992a, October 23). Annual report to NASPAA members from the chairperson of the commission on peer review and accreditation. Washington, DC: Author.
58.
National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration . (1992b, October 23). Changes to the standards for master [sic] degree programs in public affairs, policy and administration, effective September 1993. Washington, DC: Author.
59.
Oakeshott, M. (1962). The study of "politics" in a university: An essay in appropriateness. In M. Oakeshott, Rationalism in politics and other essays (pp. 301-333). London: Methuen, University Paperbacks.
60.
Ostrom, V. (1974). The intellectual crisis in American public administration (rev. ed.). University: University of Alabama Press.
61.
Palmer, K. T. , & Taylor, G. T. (1983, April). NASPAA's peer review process: A macro and micro analysis. Paper prepared for the 1983 National Conference of the American Society for Public Administration, New York.
62.
Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63.
Peters, B. G. (1988). Comparing public bureaucracies: Problems of theory and method. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
64.
Poore, D. M. (1977, January 17). Memo from chairman, Standards Committee, National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration.
65.
Poore, D. M. (1982). The impact of NASPAA's standards on defining the field of public administration. In J. A. Uveges, Jr. (Ed.), Public administration: History and theory in contemporary perspective (pp. 85-104). New York: Marcel Dekker.
66.
Rainey, H. G. , Backoff, R. W., & Levine, C. H. (1976). Comparing public and private organizations. Public Administration Review, 36, 233-244.
67.
Ramos, A. G. (1978). Misplacement of concepts and administrative theory. Public Administration Review, 38, 550-557.
68.
Rohr, J. A. (1986). To run a constitution: The legitimacy of the administrative state. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
69.
Rohr, J. A. (1989). Ethics for bureaucrats: An essay on law and values (2nd ed.). New York: Marcel Dekker.
70.
Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
71.
Ross, D. (1991). The origins of American social science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
72.
Rothschild, J. , & Whitt, J. A. (1986). The cooperative workplace: Potential and dilemmas of organizational democracy and participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
73.
Savage, P. (1974). Dismantling the administrative state: Paradigm reformulation in public administration. Political Studies, 22, 147-157.
74.
Sayre, W. S. (1958). The unhappy bureaucrats: Views ironic, hopeful, indignantPublic Administration Review, 18, 239-245.
75.
Schachter, H. L. (1990). Political science and management education Is there a relationship for public managers, business managers, or both? (Working Paper No. 3, November). New Jersey Institute of Technology, School of Industrial Management.
76.
Schein, E. H. (1980). Organizational psychology (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
77.
Schick, A. (1975). The trauma of politics: Public administration in the sixties. In F. C. Mosher (Ed.), American public administration: Past, present, future (pp. 142-180). University: University of Alabama Press.
78.
Schick, A. (1977). Beyond analysis. Public Administration Review, 37, 258-263.
79.
Sills, D. L. (1986). A note on the origin of "interdisciplinary."Items, 40(1), 17-18.
80.
Simon, H. A. (1958). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
81.
Skowronek, S. (1982). Building a new American state: The expansion of national administrative capacities, 1877-1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
82.
Stein, H. (Ed.). (1952). Public administration and policy development: A case book. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
83.
Stillman, R. J., II . (1991). Preface to public administration: A search for themes and direction. New York: St. Martin.
84.
Stocking, G. W., Jr. , & Leary, D. E. (1986). The history of social scientific inquiry. Items, 40(3/4), 53-57.
85.
Stone, D. C. (1990). The changing public service: Looking back... moving forward. Public Administration Review, 50, 206-208.
86.
Thomas, R. M. (1978). The British philosophy of administration: A comparison of British and American ideas, 1900-1939. London: Longman.
87.
Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
88.
Tribe, L. H. (1972). Policy science: Analysis or ideology?Philosophy and Public Affairs, 2, 66-110.
89.
Tussman, J. (1960). Obligation and the body politic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
90.
Ventriss, C. (1982). The coming crisis of public administration education. Southern Review of Public Administration, 6, 137-150.
91.
Wald, E. (1973). Toward a paradigm of future public administration. Public Administration Review, 33, 366-372.
92.
Waldo, D. (1975). Education for public administration in the seventies. In F. C. Mosher (Ed.), American public administration: Past, present, future (pp. 181-232). University: University of Alabama Press.
93.
Waldo, D. (1978). Organization theory: Revisiting the elephantPublic Administration Review, 38, 589-597.
94.
Waldo, D. (1980). The enterprise of public administration: A summary view. Novato, CA: Chandler & Sharp.
95.
Walzer, M. (1988). The company of critics: Social criticism and political commitment in the twentieth century. New York: Basic Books.
96.
Wamsley, G. L. (1990). Introduction. In G. L. Wamsleyet al. (Eds.), Refounding public administration (pp. 19-29). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
97.
Wamsley, G. L. , Bacher, R. N., Goodsell, C. T., Rohr, J. A., Stivers, C. M., & Wolf, J. F. (1990). Public administration and the governance process: Shifting the political dialogue. In G. L. Wamsley et al., Refounding public administration (pp. 31-51). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
98.
Warwick, D. P. (1975). A theory of public bureaucracy: Politics, personality, and organization in the State Department. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
99.
White, J. D. (1990). Images of administrative reason and rationality: The recovery of practical discourse. In H. D. Kass & B. L. Catron (Eds.), Images and identities in public administration (pp. 132-150). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
100.
Wilson, J. Q. (1993). The moral sense. American Political Science Review, 87, 1-11.
101.
Wolin, S. S. (1960). Politics and vision: Continuity and innovation in Western political thought. Boston: Little, Brown.
