This article explores the rhetorical nature and context of public administration. Rhetorical theory, although largely neglected by the field offers much in sight for public administration. A basic understanding of rhetoric and its application reveals some distinctive, legitimating aspects of the profession in practice and theory. It enables one to apprehend important differences among types of knowledge, decision making, and responsibility, and can aid the public administration in its efforts to relate theory to practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aristotle , (1960). The rhetoric of Aristotle (L. Cooper, Trans.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
2.
Banas, D. W. , & Trojanowicz, R. C. (1985a). Uniform crime reporting and community policing: An historical perspective. Community Policing Series, No. 5. East Lansing: Michigan State University, National Neighborhood Foot Patrol Center.
3.
Banas, D. W. , & Trojanowicz, R. C. (1985b). Job satisfaction: A comparison of foot patrol versus motor patron officers. Community Policing Series No. 2. East Lansing: Michigan State University, National Neighborhood Foot Patrol Center.
4.
Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
6.
Bernstein, R. J. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics, and praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
7.
Bitzer, L. (1968). The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1, 1-12.
8.
Bitzer, L. (1981). Functional communication: A situational perspective. In E. E. White (Ed.), Rhetoric in transition. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
9.
Black, M. (1962). Models and metaphors. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
10.
Black, M. (1977). More about metaphor. Dialectica, 31, 431-457.
11.
Bryner, G. C. (1987). Bureaucratic discretion: Law and policy in federal regulatory agencies. New York: Pergamon Press.
12.
Burke, K. (1967). Dramatism. In L. Thayer (Ed.), Communication: Concepts and perspectives. Washington, DC: Spartan Books.
13.
Cherwitz, R. A. , & Hikins, J. W. (1986). Communication and knowledge: An investigation in rhetorical epistemology. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
14.
Connors, R. J. , Ede, L. S., & Lunsford, A. A. (Eds.). (1984). Introduction. In Essays on classical rhetoric and modern discourse. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
15.
Crandall, R. W. , & Lave, L. B. (1981). The scientific basis of health and safety regulation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
16.
Dunn, W. N. (1981). An introduction to public policy analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
17.
Fogarty, D. J. (1959). Roots for a new rhetoric. New York: Russell & Russell.
18.
Fox, C. J. (1990, April). Warrants for public policy discourse: Public administration and democracy. Paper presented at the 3rd annual Public Administration Workshop, Los Angeles, CA.
19.
Green, R. T. (1992). Constitutional jurisprudence: Reviving praxis in public administration. Administration & Society, 24, 3-21.
20.
Gregg, R. B. (1984). Symbolic inducement and knowing: A study in the foundations of rhetoric. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
21.
Grimaldi, W.M.A. (1972). Studies in the philosophy of Aristotle's rhetoric. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag GmbH.
22.
Hairston, M. C. (1986). Bringing Aristotle's enthymeme into the composition classroom. In J. D. Moss (Ed.), Rhetoric and praxis: The contribution of classical rhetoric to practical reasoning (pp. 59-78). Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.
23.
Halloran, S. M. (1982). Rhetoric in the American college curriculum: The decline of public discourse. Preff Text, 3, 254-269.
24.
Hauser, G. (1986). Introduction to rhetorical theory. New York: Harper & Row.
25.
Hood, C. , & Jackson, M. (1991). Administrative argument. Brookfield, VT: Gower.
26.
Hummel, R. (1991). Stories managers tell: Why they are as valid as science. Public Administration Review, 51, 31-41.
27.
Jonsen, A. R. , & Toulmin, S. (1988). The abuse of casuistry: A history of moral reasoning. Berkeley: University of California Press.
28.
Kahn, V. (1985). Rhetoric, prudence, and skepticism in the Renaissance. Ithaca, NY: Comell University Press.
29.
Kass, H. , & Catron, B. L. (1990). Images and identities in public administration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30.
Kennedy, G. A. (1980). Classical rhetoric and its Christian and secular tradition from ancient to modern times. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
31.
Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
Leys, W.A.R. (1952). Ethics for policy decisions: The art of asking deliberative questions. New York: Prentice-Hall.
33.
Majone, G. (1989). Evidence, argument, and persuasion in the policy process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
34.
Malinowski, B. (1923). The problem of meaning in primitive language. In. C. K. Ogden & I. A. Richards (Eds.), The meaning of meaning (pp. 296-336). Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
35.
Maslow, A. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370-396.
36.
McCloskey, D. N. (1985). The rhetoric of economics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
37.
McCollough, T. E. (1991). The moral imagination and public life. Chatharn, NJ: Chatham House.
38.
Morgan, D. F. , & Kass, H. D. (1989). Constitutional stewardship, phronesis and the American administrative ethos. Dialogue, 12, 17-60.
39.
Moss, J. D. (1986). The contribution of classical rhetoric to practical reasoning. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.
40.
Murphy, J. J. (1974). Rhetoric in the Middle Ages: A history of rhetorical theory from Saint Augustine to the Renaissance. Berkeley: University of California Press.
41.
Ong, J. (1958). Ramus: Method, and the decay of dialogue. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
Perelman, C. (1980). Justice, law, and argument: Essays on moral and legal reasoning. Boston: D. Reidel.
43.
Prelli, L. J. (1989). A rhetoric of science: Inventing scientific discourse. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
44.
Rohr, J. A. (1986). To run a constitution: The legitimacy of the administrative state. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
45.
Rohr, J. A. (1989). Ethics for bureaucrats: An essay on law and values (2nd ed.). New York: Marcel Dekker.
46.
Schuster, J. A. , & Yeo, R. R. (Eds.). (1986). The politics and rhetoric of scientific method. Boston: D. Reidel.
47.
Simon, H. A. (1945). Administrative behavior. New York: Free Press.
48.
Skolnick, J. H. , & Bayley, A. (1988). Community policing: Issues & practices around the world. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
49.
Sparrow, M. K. (1988, November). Iplementing community policing. Perspectives on policing (No. 9). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
50.
Stivers, C. (1990, April). The shape of the stone: A feminist reflection on practical wisdom in public administration. Paper prepared for the 3rd annual Public Administration Theory Network Workshop, Los Angeles, CA.
51.
Stone, D. A. (1988). Policy paradox and political reason. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
52.
Thompson, K. W. (Ed.). (1988). Discourse and the two cultures: Science, religion and the humanities (Vol. 19). Exxon Education Foundation Series on Rhetoric and Politcal Discourse. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
53.
Wamsley, G. L. , Bacher, R. N., Goodsell, C. T., Kronenberg, P. S., Rohr, J. A., Stivers, C. M., White, O. F., & Wolf, J. F. (1990). Refounding public administration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
54.
Weaver, R. (1963). Language is sermonic. In R. E. Nebergall (Ed.), Dimensions of rhetorical scholarship. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
55.
White, J. B. (1984). When words lose their meaning: Constitutions and reconstitutions of language, character, and community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56.
White, J. B. (1985). Heracle `s bow: Essays on the rhetoric and poetics of the law. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
57.
Williams, J. , & Sloan, R. (1990). Turning concept into practice: The Aurora, Colorado story. Community Policing Series, No. 19. East Lansing: Michigan State University, National Center for Commnity Policing.
58.
Zinke, R. C. (1989). Rhetoric, moality, and practical wisdom in public administration. Dialogue, 12, 61-86.
59.
Zinke, R. C. (1990, April). American constitutionalism in the interconnected world: Administrative responsibilities in a rhetorical republic. Paper presented at the 3rd annual Public Admninistration Workshop, Los Angeles, CA.
