Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

As public administrators attempt to decide where to site public facilities, they often conduct activities designed to encourage citizen participation. It frequently is not clear that public involvement is enhanced through those activities. Perhaps one of the reasons those activities are less successful than they might be is that administrators and citizens enter into them without a very thorough understanding of their own motivations, much less the motivations of others. More important for the connection that citizens and administrators make during these activities, they may not understand the dynamics that are set in motion when their own motivations interact with those of others involved in the activity. After discussing the importance of this topic for public administration theory, this article speculates about the dynamics that are likely to be set in motion when a variety of citizens' motivations connect with a variety of administrators' motivations. It concludes that progress in the important project of improving the citizen-administrator connection is likely to be rather slow.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Appleby, P. H. (1952). Morality and administration in democratic government. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.

Berelson, B. R. (1956). Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Burke, J. P. (1986). Bureaucratic responsibility. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Cooper, T. L. (1991). An ethic of citizenship for public administration. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Finer, H. (1941). Administrative responsibility in democratic government. Public Administration Review, l(Summer), 335-350.

Follett, M. P. (1965). The new state. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.

Frederickson, H. G. (1982). The recovery of civism in public administration. Public Administration Review, 42(November/December), 501-508.

Frederickson, H. G. (1991). Toward a theory of the public for public administration. Administration and Society, 22(2), 395-417.

Frederickson, H. G. , & Hart, D. K. (1985). The public service and the patriotism of benevolence. Public Administration Review, 45, 547-553.

10.

Goodsell, C. (1985). The case for bureaucracy: A public administration polemic (2nd ed.). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.

11.

Lipset, S. M. (1960). Political man. New York: Doubleday.

12.

Lowi, T. J. (1979). The end of liberalism. New York: Norton.

13.

Rohr, J. (1986). To run a constitution: The legitimacy of the administrative state. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

14.

Schumpeter, J. E. (1950). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy (3rd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.

15.

Stivers, C. (1988). Active citizenship in the administrative state. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia.

16.

Stivers, C. (1990). The public agency as polis: Active citizenship in the administrative state. Administration & Society, 22(2), 86-105.

17.

Stivers, C. (1991). Some tensions in the notion of `the public as citizen.' Administration & Society, 22(2), 418-423.

18.

Wilson, W. (1887). The study of administration. In J. Shafritz &A. Hyde, Classics of public administration (pp. 10-25). Chicago: Dorsey Press.

19.

Yates, D. (1982). Bureaucratic democracy: The search for democracy and efficiency in American government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Citizen-Administrator Connections

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References